The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Onyx CenterSource shines .
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 69 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 69 |
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, Onyx CenterSource users most value its , while ROH users highlight automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 21 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 28 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 61 reviews |
| Europe | — | #3 1 reviews |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel can significantly impact your operational efficiency, cash flow, and guest experience. Onyx CenterSource and ROH both aim to automate and streamline transactions, but their offerings differ dramatically. While Onyx CenterSource has limited recent reviews and a low overall rating, ROH stands out with a high review count and recent positive feedback. This stark contrast begs the question: which product truly suits your hotel’s needs?
The core difference lies in their approach—Onyx CenterSource provides a broad B2B payments platform with a focus on global hotel relationships, whereas ROH specializes in automating guest payments and invoicing with a user-friendly interface. Their capabilities reflect these focuses, making their suitability vary based on your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic goals.
Are you prioritizing a well-supported, highly-rated platform with recent reviews? Or are you looking for a more feature-rich, flexible solution that’s proven to deliver results? Let’s explore how these two options stack up across key areas to help you make an informed decision.
Onyx CenterSource and ROH serve different hotel segments and operational needs, though both aim to streamline payments. Onyx CenterSource, founded in 2013, boasts a global reach with over 150,000 properties and facilitates more than $2 billion in payments annually, but it has zero recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating—indicating a lack of recent user feedback and likely minimal current user satisfaction.
ROH, by contrast, has 65 reviews with a 100/100 HTR score and recent feedback from 10 reviews within the last six months. Hotels report that ROH’s ease of use and support are excellent, with a 4.97/5 customer support rating and a 4.84/5 value score, making it the more trusted and proven choice among current users.
Given these differences, your decision hinges on whether you need a broad, global payments platform (Onyx) or a highly-rated, guest payment automation system (ROH). Do your hotel’s priorities align more with sophisticated business intelligence and global relationships or with simplified, efficient payment management? The choice depends on your specific operational needs.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-use platform that minimizes staff training and maximizes guest satisfaction, ROH is the clear choice. Its user-friendly interface, highly recent positive reviews, and features like payment splitting, pay-by-link, and recurring payments make it ideal for hotels focused on operational simplicity and guest experience.
Onyx CenterSource is better suited for large, complex hotel networks or global operations that require extensive B2B payment relationships. Its focus on commission payments and business intelligence fits hotels with extensive partner networks or those seeking detailed financial reporting, but its lack of recent reviews makes its current usability and support less certain.
For most hotels seeking a reliable, modern payments solution, ROH’s current review strength and feature set make it the more practical choice. If your hotel’s needs are primarily operational and guest-centric, ROH should be your go-to.
ROH shines with a 4.95/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews from 10 users, who describe it as "amazing" and "extremely user friendly." Multiple reviewers highlight how it simplifies finding payments and scheduling, with no questions from clients about platform use, making onboarding straightforward.
Onyx CenterSource, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use with no recent reviews, suggesting that current hotel users may find it difficult or outdated. Its limited user feedback and the absence of recent testimonials imply that staff adoption and onboarding could be a challenge.
Edge: ROH.
ROH offers 19 unique features, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, acceptances of Apple Pay, Google Pay, Visa, American Express, and Diner’s Club, as well as chargeback management and PCI compliance. These features enable flexible, modern payment options and detailed transaction management.
Onyx CenterSource provides no notable features beyond its core payment processing capabilities, which are not explicitly detailed. Given the feature-rich nature of ROH, especially in payment options and management, it clearly surpasses Onyx CenterSource in functional depth.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s recent reviews rate its customer support at 4.97/5, with comments like "support staff is great" and "training is easy," reflecting high satisfaction and ease of onboarding. Its recent reviews also mention prompt support and smooth implementation.
Onyx CenterSource has a 0/5 support rating with no recent reviews, making it difficult to assess current support quality. The absence of recent feedback suggests limited or outdated support experiences, which is critical for a payments platform.
Edge: ROH.
ROH offers one verified integration with Oracle Hospitality but has a total of 1 verified partner. Onyx CenterSource has two verified partners, Shiji Group and Stayntouch, but with limited details on their integration depth.
Despite Onyx’s slightly higher partner count, ROH’s integrations are more proven and recent, especially with Oracle Hospitality, a key industry player. However, neither platform has an extensive or varied integration ecosystem.
Edge: Onyx CenterSource (by a small margin).
ROH’s 65 reviews, predominantly recent, give it a near-perfect score of 100/100 and a likelihood to recommend of 99%. Hotels of various sizes, especially those seeking ease of use and strong support, rate it highly.
Onyx CenterSource has no recent reviews or ratings, reflecting a lack of current user satisfaction data. Without recent feedback, its rating is effectively unavailable, making ROH the clearly higher-rated choice.
Edge: ROH.
Onyx CenterSource does not disclose pricing details, and it does not offer a freemium or trial, suggesting a potentially high or customized price point. Its model likely involves bespoke quotes based on hotel size or network.
ROH charges a straightforward $100 monthly base fee, with no mention of additional costs or per-room fees. This transparent pricing makes ROH accessible for hotels of varying sizes and budgets.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Onyx, ROH’s clear and predictable model is more appealing.
Edge: ROH.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
In essence, Onyx CenterSource and ROH serve very different hotel operations. Onyx’s strengths lie in global B2B relationships, commission management, and business intelligence, making it suitable for large, complex hotel networks. Its lack of recent reviews raises concerns about current usability and support, however, which diminishes its appeal.
ROH, with its recent 65 reviews and high scores, offers a straightforward, user-friendly platform ideal for hotels prioritizing guest payment automation, quick onboarding, and reliable support. Its 19 features and transparent pricing make it an accessible choice for most hotels seeking a modern payments solution.
For hotels that need a proven, highly-rated payment platform with a focus on ease and support, ROH is the definitive choice. Larger, global operations with complex partner relationships should consider Onyx, but only if they can verify ongoing support and usability.
In conclusion, if recent reviews and user satisfaction are your priorities, ROH is the clear winner. Its high ratings, feature set, and support quality make it the safer, more effective choice for most hotels today.
Payments Processing Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Onyx CenterSource and ROH share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Refund Management |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Onyx CenterSource and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Onyx CenterSource offers 2 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Onyx CenterSource: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Onyx CenterSource has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor