The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
OpenHotel shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
CEI Europe shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 58 | 0 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, OpenHotel users most value its customer support, user-friendly pms, continuous updates and improvements, while CEI Europe users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
OpenHotel
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly PMS
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Updates and Improvements
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct OTA Connections
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Financial Processing
▾
|
|
|
−
Group Booking Tools
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
OpenHotel
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #25 36 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #39 11 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #50 0 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #21 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
OpenHotel
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #37 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #45 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #28 9 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #43 2 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
OpenHotel
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #14 54 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Both OpenHotel PMS and Quohotel PMS aim to streamline hotel management tasks, but they diverge significantly in market presence, features, and user feedback. OpenHotel boasts a strong track record with more recent reviews and a broader feature set, making it a clear leader in this comparison.
OpenHotel PMS is designed with small to medium-sized hotels in mind, offering a robust, integrated platform that combines PMS, channel management, booking engine, revenue management, and more. Quohotel, meanwhile, provides a more basic, centralized system without the extensive feature set or recent user feedback to match OpenHotel’s proven track record.
Would your hotel benefit more from a mature, feature-rich platform with ongoing support, or do you need a simpler, less integrated solution? The answer hinges on your operational complexity and growth ambitions.
OpenHotel and Quohotel both serve the hotel industry, but their maturity levels and market presence differ markedly. OpenHotel’s platform addresses a broad spectrum of operational needs with 23 unique features, including channel management, revenue optimization, and digital registration, all integrated into a cloud-based system. Its recent reviews, totaling 57 in the past six months, highlight a consistent 4.81/5 overall rating, a 9.53/5 NPS score, and a 95% likelihood to recommend.
In contrast, Quohotel has no recent reviews, no ratings, and only one verified integration, which suggests a less established footprint. OpenHotel’s recent user feedback emphasizes its ease of use, excellent support, and comprehensive capabilities, whereas Quohotel lacks that recent, detailed user insight. The clearer, more recent data regarding OpenHotel’s performance makes it the more reliable choice today.
Are you willing to risk less proven software for a potentially cheaper, less supported alternative? Given the current data, OpenHotel clearly outperforms Quohotel in user trust and product maturity.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, multi-functional PMS with a proven track record, go with OpenHotel. Its extensive feature set—channel management, revenue management, booking engine, payments, and more—is designed to meet the demands of diverse hotel types, especially small to medium properties seeking a reliable, all-in-one solution.
If your hotel requires a basic, straightforward management platform without deep integration needs or advanced features, Quohotel might be a consideration, but the lack of recent reviews and feature depth suggests it’s less suited for operational growth. The decision ultimately depends on whether your hotel values a mature, well-supported system over a simpler, less proven one.
For hoteliers looking to increase operational efficiency and guest satisfaction, OpenHotel’s mature platform offers a clear advantage. Conversely, if your hotel operates at a very small scale with minimal management needs, Quohotel’s simplicity could suffice, though it’s a less secure bet.
OpenHotel’s user interface reports a high ease-of-use rating of 4.71/5, with many users citing its intuitive layout and straightforward navigation. Onboarding is rated at 4.61/5, and customer support is highly praised, with a support rating of 4.82/5. Users mention that the platform’s continuous improvements and friendly support staff make adoption smoother, which is especially important for hotels with limited IT resources.
Quohotel’s usability data is unavailable, and the lack of recent reviews makes it difficult to assess its user-friendliness. Without a proven reputation or detailed user feedback, we cannot confidently say it’s easier to adopt than OpenHotel.
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel boasts 23 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management module, automated night audit, online support, guest communication tools, native email marketing, and digital registration. These features cover nearly every operational need a hotel might have, making it a full-service platform. Its integrated system reduces manual work and improves accuracy.
Quohotel, on the other hand, offers a more limited feature set with only basic reservation, billing, and housekeeping functions. Its lack of advanced features or third-party integrations limits its ability to support complex hotel operations.
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel’s support ratings are among the highest in this comparison, at 4.82/5, with reviews highlighting excellent, personalized service. Users mention that their support team is responsive and invested in helping solve issues quickly, which is vital during busy periods or system transitions.
Quohotel offers no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its customer service reputation ambiguous. Given OpenHotel’s consistent high marks and verified positive reviews, it clearly provides better support.
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel offers 12 verified partners, including major channel managers, OTAs, and payment processors like SiteMinder, RateGain, and Canary Technologies. These integrations facilitate seamless operations across booking channels, revenue management, and guest communication.
Quohotel has only one verified integration (Duetto), which limits its ability to connect with third-party tools. For hotels relying on multiple integrations for operational efficiency, OpenHotel’s broader ecosystem provides a distinct advantage.
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel’s recent reviews show a high satisfaction level, with a 4.81/5 overall rating, 95% likelihood to recommend, and a 9.53/5 NPS score. Its most valued features include ease of use, customer support, and extensive functionality, especially among small and boutique hotels.
Quohotel’s user feedback is unavailable, and no ratings or recent reviews exist. With a proven track record and high praise, OpenHotel enjoys the trust of its users, making it the better-rated PMS.
Edge: OpenHotel.
Both products do not publicly disclose specific pricing models. OpenHotel’s pricing is typically based on a flat monthly fee, with no implementation or per-booking charges, making costs predictable. Quohotel’s pricing details are not available, limiting direct comparison.
If budget is a concern, note that OpenHotel’s proven value with extensive features and support offers a high return on investment, despite the lack of specific pricing data.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with minimal management needs or prefers very basic software with limited integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced revenue management, channel management, or integrated marketing tools, or if you value extensive customer support.
OpenHotel and Quohotel cater to different segments of the hospitality industry. OpenHotel’s comprehensive, feature-rich platform suits hotels looking for reliability, extensive capabilities, and proven support, backed by recent reviews and high ratings. Quohotel remains less proven and lacks recent user feedback, making it a riskier choice.
Choose OpenHotel if you want a mature, highly-rated PMS that can grow with your hotel and support complex operations. If your hotel’s needs are minimal and you prioritize simplicity over features, Quohotel could be sufficient, but with the caveat of limited available data to support this choice.
In summary, for most hotels seeking a trusted, well-supported system, OpenHotel is the clear option. Its broad feature set, high customer satisfaction, and active user community make it the better investment today.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
OpenHotel
|
CEI Europe |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, OpenHotel PMS and Quohotel PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
OpenHotel
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
The open availability and responsiveness of customer support teams are highly appreciated among users. Many specifically mentioned the helpfulness of... The open availability and responsiveness of customer support teams are highly appreciated among users. Many specifically mentioned the helpfulness of the team during emergencies and the seamless transition to OpenHotel PMS. This support aids in smooth operations, especially during peak seasons or system transitions.
Many users appreciate how easy it is to navigate and use OpenHotel's PMS. The system is intuitive, even for first-time hotel clerks, and it offers sea... Many users appreciate how easy it is to navigate and use OpenHotel's PMS. The system is intuitive, even for first-time hotel clerks, and it offers seamless transitions from other systems. Users note it is particularly effective for small to medium-sized properties because of its flexible booking grid and comprehensive layout.
Users appreciate that OpenHotel is consistently improving and adding features based on user feedback. This dedication ensures the system stays up-to-d... Users appreciate that OpenHotel is consistently improving and adding features based on user feedback. This dedication ensures the system stays up-to-date with industry standards and evolving hotel needs. Notifications about these updates are shared through inbox notifications, making it convenient for users to stay informed.
Where hoteliers push back
While many appreciate the detailed and comprehensive reporting options available in OpenHotel, there is a recurring request for customizable reports a... While many appreciate the detailed and comprehensive reporting options available in OpenHotel, there is a recurring request for customizable reports and improved metrics suited to specific properties. Some users find current reports cluttered with unnecessary information and have suggested enhancements to better meet their needs.
Users noted that OpenHotel has efficient financial processing modules, including organized views of financials, customizable financial reports, and in... Users noted that OpenHotel has efficient financial processing modules, including organized views of financials, customizable financial reports, and integration with external fiscal systems. However, enhancements are suggested, particularly around real-time tax reporting and card payment interventions.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. OpenHotel PMS and Quohotel PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. OpenHotel PMS offers 12 verified integration partners, while Quohotel PMS offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. OpenHotel PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
OpenHotel PMS: No. Quohotel PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. OpenHotel has an HT Score of 16 and CEI Europe has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor