The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
OpenHotel shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Tesipro shines , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 58 | 0 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, OpenHotel users most value its customer support, user-friendly pms, continuous updates and improvements, while Tesipro users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly PMS
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Updates and Improvements
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct OTA Connections
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Financial Processing
▾
|
|
|
−
Group Booking Tools
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #25 36 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #39 11 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #50 0 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #21 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #37 16 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #45 4 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #28 9 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #43 2 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #14 54 reviews | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that simplifies operations, boosts revenue, and integrates smoothly with your existing tools. OpenHotel PMS by OpenHotel and Tesipro by Tesipro both aim to serve this purpose but differ significantly in market presence, features, and user feedback. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize proven user satisfaction or a broad feature set.
OpenHotel boasts a strong reputation backed by over 50 recent reviews, high ratings, and a dedicated user base. Tesipro, however, has no recent reviews and a smaller footprint, making its support and real-world performance less certain. Given your hotel’s need for reliable, well-supported software, which platform should you trust?
OpenHotel and Tesipro both address core hotel management challenges—reservation handling, guest management, and operational workflows. OpenHotel’s strength lies in its user-centric design, extensive support, and proven track record, while Tesipro markets itself as a comprehensive solution capable of complex setups.
OpenHotel’s reviews emphasize ease of use, excellent support, and ongoing updates, whereas Tesipro’s lack of recent feedback makes it harder to gauge current performance. Do you want a system with a well-documented track record, or are you willing to consider a less proven, broader feature set?
If your hotel primarily needs a reliable, easy-to-use PMS with strong support and positive user reviews, go with OpenHotel. It suits small to medium-sized properties, especially those seeking seamless channel management and straightforward reservation handling.
If you require a highly customizable platform with a wide array of features—such as guest CRM, mobile check-in, or integrated revenue management—and your hotel operates at a larger scale, Tesipro could be a candidate. However, its lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes this a riskier choice for most hoteliers.
OpenHotel’s user rating of 4.71/5 and its 57 reviews over recent months reflect a highly intuitive system. Users commend its straightforward interface, quick onboarding, and simple navigation, making staff adoption easier, especially for smaller hotels.
Tesipro’s interface and usability are unverified due to the absence of recent review data, leaving their ease of use uncertain. The lack of recent user feedback suggests it might not match OpenHotel’s current user-friendly reputation.
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel offers five unique features tailored for small to medium properties: revenue management modules, ancillary revenue tracking, guest profiles, native email marketing, and guest communication (SMS). Its core shared features include reservations, channel management, and reporting.
Tesipro boasts 26 features, including a spa & wellness module, integrated CRS, guest CRM, mobile app, task management, online check-in/out, and employee messaging. It caters to larger, more complex hotel setups but lacks the proven usability that OpenHotel emphasizes.
Edge: Tesipro for feature breadth; OpenHotel for targeted, hotel-friendly features.
OpenHotel’s support rating of 4.82/5 across 57 recent reviews highlights its responsiveness and personal service. Users frequently mention the effectiveness of their customer service, with many citing quick resolution times and supportive staff.
Tesipro’s support and support ratings are not available, making it difficult to evaluate the quality of their customer service. The absence of recent reviews suggests that support might not match OpenHotel’s high standards.
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel connects with 12 verified partners, including key channels like SiteMinder, RateGain, and Canary Technologies. Its integrations support essential functions like channel management, reputation, and guest communication.
Tesipro offers 25 verified integrations, including major brands like Cendyn, Nonius, and yieldPlanet S.A., and supports extensive property and resource management integrations. While broader, the actual usability and support quality of these integrations are less clear due to limited recent feedback.
Edge: Tesipro, in sheer numbers; but OpenHotel’s quality and support are more established.
OpenHotel’s recent reviews show a high rating of 4.81/5, with users praising its ease of use, customer support, and overall reliability. Smaller properties, especially in North America and Europe, favor its straightforward implementation and support.
There are no recent reviews for Tesipro, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. The lack of recent feedback suggests less confidence in its performance and support at this time.
Edge: OpenHotel.
OpenHotel does not publicly list its pricing, suggesting a tailored quote based on property size and needs. It offers a pay-per-room model with no implementation or hidden fees, emphasizing transparency.
Tesipro charges $1,300 per month without additional details on setup costs. Its pricing may be suitable for larger properties with complex needs but could be prohibitive for smaller hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on highly specialized features like extensive spa management or complex loyalty integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel needs straightforward, user-friendly software with proven support and recent reviews.
OpenHotel offers a proven, highly-rated PMS with a focus on ease, support, and core features that small and mid-sized hotels need. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores make it a dependable choice for hotels prioritizing reliability and customer service.
Tesipro provides a broader feature set designed for larger, more complex hotel operations, but the absence of recent reviews and user feedback introduces uncertainty. Its strengths lie in extensive integrations and customization, making it suitable if your hotel requires those capabilities and can manage a more complex system.
If your hotel values dependable support, user-friendly operation, and a strong reputation, OpenHotel is the recommended option. Only consider Tesipro if your hotel’s operational complexity justifies the risk and you need its advanced, diverse features.
According to HTR's product database, OpenHotel PMS and Tesipro share 18 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
OpenHotel
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 19 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
The open availability and responsiveness of customer support teams are highly appreciated among users. Many specifically mentioned the helpfulness of... The open availability and responsiveness of customer support teams are highly appreciated among users. Many specifically mentioned the helpfulness of the team during emergencies and the seamless transition to OpenHotel PMS. This support aids in smooth operations, especially during peak seasons or system transitions.
Many users appreciate how easy it is to navigate and use OpenHotel's PMS. The system is intuitive, even for first-time hotel clerks, and it offers sea... Many users appreciate how easy it is to navigate and use OpenHotel's PMS. The system is intuitive, even for first-time hotel clerks, and it offers seamless transitions from other systems. Users note it is particularly effective for small to medium-sized properties because of its flexible booking grid and comprehensive layout.
Users appreciate that OpenHotel is consistently improving and adding features based on user feedback. This dedication ensures the system stays up-to-d... Users appreciate that OpenHotel is consistently improving and adding features based on user feedback. This dedication ensures the system stays up-to-date with industry standards and evolving hotel needs. Notifications about these updates are shared through inbox notifications, making it convenient for users to stay informed.
Where hoteliers push back
While many appreciate the detailed and comprehensive reporting options available in OpenHotel, there is a recurring request for customizable reports a... While many appreciate the detailed and comprehensive reporting options available in OpenHotel, there is a recurring request for customizable reports and improved metrics suited to specific properties. Some users find current reports cluttered with unnecessary information and have suggested enhancements to better meet their needs.
Users noted that OpenHotel has efficient financial processing modules, including organized views of financials, customizable financial reports, and in... Users noted that OpenHotel has efficient financial processing modules, including organized views of financials, customizable financial reports, and integration with external fiscal systems. However, enhancements are suggested, particularly around real-time tax reporting and card payment interventions.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. OpenHotel PMS and Tesipro share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. OpenHotel PMS offers 12 verified integration partners, while Tesipro offers 25. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. OpenHotel PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
OpenHotel PMS: No. Tesipro: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. OpenHotel has an HT Score of 16 and Tesipro has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor