The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Opera shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 887 | 0 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Mews users most value its ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, while Opera users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Opera |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Opera |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 329 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 397 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 45 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #3 49 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Opera |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 220 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 170 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 130 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Opera |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 106 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #10 17 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #28 8 reviews | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. With Mews PMS dominating recent reviews, and Opera offering a more traditional, less reviewed solution, your decision hinges on needs for modern features, scalability, and support. Both aim to streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in user experience, integrations, and innovation.
Your hotel’s size, technological ambitions, and guest expectations will determine which platform suits you best. Are you ready to embrace a cloud-native, highly integrated system, or do you prefer a more established, perhaps less agile, solution like Opera?
Mews PMS offers a cloud-based platform with a 4.62-star rating from over 758 reviews, including 98 recent ones, emphasizing its modernity and reliability. Opera, with a score of 0/5 and no reviews, appears static and untested in the current market. Mews’s recent feedback highlights its ease of use, extensive integrations, and automation capabilities, making it a favorite among hoteliers seeking digital transformation.
Opera’s lack of recent reviews and low overall ratings suggest it may not keep pace with evolving hotel demands. Do you want a proven, continuously improving system, or are you comfortable with a platform that lacks recent validation?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-native PMS with over 336 verified integrations, Mews is the clear choice. It suits independent, boutique, and mid-sized hotels eager for automation, real-time data, and a modern guest journey. Conversely, Opera might appeal to properties that prefer traditional, on-premise solutions, or those already deeply embedded in legacy systems, but without recent reviews, this is an uncertain fit.
For hotels prioritizing innovation, multi-property management, and a future-proof platform, Mews’s recent growth and user feedback make it the definitive option. Opera’s lack of recent validation makes it risky unless you have specific, legacy-dependent needs.
Mews boasts a 4.7/5 ease of use rating, backed by 98 recent reviews praising its user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and intuitive workflows. Hotel staff report that training is minimal, and the platform’s modern design simplifies daily tasks, even for less tech-savvy teams.
Opera’s ease of use remains unverified with no recent reviews, and its interface is often described as outdated and less intuitive. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 exclusive features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online check-in, guest CRM, integrated CRS, and automated night audits—features that are absent in Opera. Its feature set is tailored for dynamic, modern hospitality needs, supporting seamless guest experiences and operational control.
Opera’s feature list is either unreported or undocumented here, with no indication of innovative capabilities. Given Mews’s detailed features and recent positive reviews emphasizing their utility, the edge goes to Mews.
Mews maintains a 4.27/5 support rating, with reviewers citing responsive, helpful support, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Many praise the “support team sets new standards” and note rapid issue resolution.
Opera’s support ratings and recent feedback are unavailable, indicating a lack of recent engagement or validation. Based on current data, edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, covering channel managers, POS, revenue management, and more, allowing extensive customization. In contrast, Opera shows no verified integrations here, suggesting limited or outdated connectivity.
The breadth and quality of Mews’s integrations empower hotels to build a tailored tech ecosystem. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews show an average rating of 4.62/5, with high praise from boutique, independent, and city-center hotels. Hotels in segments like hostels and small boutique properties rate it highly for ease of use, automation, and support.
Opera’s ratings are unreported or nonexistent in recent data, making Mews the clear favorite. For hotels valuing peer validation, Mews’s recent review volume and scores provide confidence. Edge: Mews.
Mews charges a base price of $900/month without a freemium option or visible pricing for Opera. The lack of transparent pricing for Opera suggests it may be tailored or outdated, whereas Mews’s clear pricing allows for budget planning.
If transparency and predictable costs matter, Mews’s straightforward pricing model is advantageous. Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers legacy systems or has minimal tech needs. Small boutique hotels with limited budgets or those managing only a few rooms might find Mews’s costs less justified.
Not ideal if you’re seeking flexibility, automation, or a modern guest interface. Small or boutique hotels wanting a future-proof system should consider Mews instead.
Mews stands out as the most reviewed, most recent, and feature-rich PMS tailored for modern hospitality. Its cloud platform and extensive integrations make it suitable for hotels aiming to innovate and scale efficiently.
Choose Mews if you prioritize automation, flexibility, and peer-reviewed reliability. Opt for Opera only if you operate within a legacy system environment, with minimal need for modern features, though this approach carries significant uncertainty given the lack of recent validation.
In conclusion, Mews’s recent reviews, high ratings, and broad feature set position it as the smarter choice for forward-thinking hotels. Opera’s absence of recent validation makes it an unreliable option for any hotel seeking current operational efficiency or guest-centric innovations.
According to HTR's product database, Mews PMS and Opera share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Opera |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Mews PMS and Opera share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Mews PMS offers 336 verified integration partners, while Opera offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Mews PMS: No. Opera: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Mews has an HT Score of 100 and Opera has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor