The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 105 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Opera shines .
Sirvoy shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 105 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 105 |
After analyzing 105 verified reviews, Opera users most value its , while Sirvoy users highlight customer support, ease of use, reservation management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Opera |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface and Design
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Functionality Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Adaptability
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost and Value for Money
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #22 36 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #48 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #27 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #29 21 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #37 7 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #42 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #35 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #23 16 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 31 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #13 6 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing between Opera by Opera and Sirvoy by Sirvoy hinges on your hotel's specific needs, budget, and growth plans. Opera is a longstanding, comprehensive PMS with no recent reviews, while Sirvoy boasts recent, plentiful user feedback and a clear market presence. Both address core property management needs, but their approach and feature sets differ significantly. Which one aligns better with your operational priorities?
Opera offers a wide array of features tailored for larger hotels, but its lack of recent reviews and a low user satisfaction score raise questions. Sirvoy, with its recent surge in reviews and high ratings, appears to be the more reliable choice for small to medium properties. Are you ready to explore these differences further?
Opera aims to serve large hotel chains and resorts with extensive operational needs, providing an all-in-one enterprise-level platform. Sirvoy, on the other hand, targets small to medium-sized hotels, B&Bs, and hostels, emphasizing simplicity and ease of use. Opera's core strengths lie in its broad functionality, but it suffers from a lack of recent customer engagement or reviews, making its current efficacy uncertain.
Sirvoy's recent reviews, from over 95 users, highlight its user-friendly interface, affordability, and strong customer support, with a 9.41/10 NPS score. Its more recent user feedback—32 reviews in the last six months—confirms its current relevance and customer satisfaction. Given the absence of Opera reviews in the past year, is it prudent to rely on a platform with no recent validation?
If your hotel requires extensive enterprise features, integrations, and detailed reporting to manage multiple properties or large operations, Opera might seem appealing. However, since Opera’s review count is zero and its ratings are nonexistent, relying on it could be risky for your current needs.
For small to medium properties seeking an intuitive, cost-effective system with excellent support, Sirvoy is the clear winner. Its recent reviews—mainly 4.6/5 for ease of use and 4.85/5 for support—show it reliably meets user expectations now. If you prioritize proven user satisfaction and ongoing development, Sirvoy is the more solid choice.
Opera’s usability is not supported by any recent reviews, making it difficult to judge its current user friendliness. The absence of recent feedback suggests limited recent updates or customer experience validation.
Sirvoy, with a 4.64/5 ease of use rating and 32 recent reviews, is consistently praised for its intuitive interface and straightforward setup. Support staff are responsive, often described as helpful and timely, which is crucial for onboarding and staff adoption. Edge: Sirvoy.
Opera’s feature set is not listed or detailed in recent reviews, and no unique functionalities are highlighted, indicating a potential lack of recent updates or user-perceived innovation.
Sirvoy boasts 43 unique features, including multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, guest communication, online check-in/out, automated reminders, integrated payment processing, and a responsive mobile app. These features cater directly to small and medium properties seeking automation and ease of management. Edge: Sirvoy.
Opera’s support ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, its current support quality is uncertain.
Sirvoy’s support is highly rated at 4.85/5, with user testimonials emphasizing quick, helpful, and thorough assistance. Multiple reviews describe their customer service as "excellent" and "the best support" experienced, which adds confidence in their ongoing support quality. Edge: Sirvoy.
Opera’s total verified integrations are zero, which suggests limited or no current third-party connectivity.
Sirvoy offers integrations with 21 verified partners, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS, plus tools like TrustYou, SiteMinder, and Revinate. This broad integration landscape allows your hotel to connect with essential distribution and reputation management tools. Edge: Sirvoy.
Opera’s ratings are non-existent, so no current hotel ratings or segment-based feedback are available.
Sirvoy’s user ratings are notably high, with a 4.64/5 ease of use and a 4.85/5 support score. Recent reviews from diverse segments—such as boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts—confirm high satisfaction across property types. Its recent reviews reinforce its reliability and customer approval. Edge: Sirvoy.
Opera does not publish pricing publicly and appears to lack a freemium or trial option, suggesting it may be a high-cost, enterprise-level solution requiring custom quotes.
Sirvoy charges a flat $200/month fee with no implementation costs, no freemium model, and a 30-day trial. Its transparent pricing makes it accessible for small to medium properties and allows easier budgeting. If cost transparency is critical, Sirvoy wins.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
Opera’s core advantage is its comprehensive, enterprise-grade management capabilities, but it currently lacks recent user validation, making its effectiveness uncertain. It’s best suited for large, multi-property operations with dedicated technical resources and complex needs. Its absence of recent reviews suggests it may not be tuned for the needs of smaller hotels today.
Sirvoy stands out with a recent, growing user base and high satisfaction scores. Its intuitive design, strong customer support, and broad integrations make it ideal for small and medium properties seeking a straightforward, cost-effective management system that remains reliable and scalable. If you want proven customer approval and ongoing support, Sirvoy is the clear choice.
In summary, unless your hotel operates on a large scale with complex needs, Sirvoy’s recent reviews and high ratings make it the safer, more dependable option right now. Opera’s strengths lie in its potential and extensive features, but without recent validation, it may be less suitable for your current requirements. For most hoteliers evaluating today’s PMS options, Sirvoy offers a more concrete and confident solution.
According to HTR's product database, Opera and Sirvoy share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 31 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suite... Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suites or offering package deals are noted as areas that require enhancement.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved fin... Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved financial and invoicing features. There's also feedback on the lack of advanced CRM options and difficulties in integrating upselling features.
Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wis... Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wish for more flexibility in invoice customization and dynamic billing options.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Opera and Sirvoy share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Opera offers 0 verified integration partners, while Sirvoy offers 21. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Sirvoy leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Opera: No. Sirvoy: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Opera has an HT Score of 0 and Sirvoy has 85. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor