The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Passepartout shines .
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Passepartout users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Passepartout |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is vital for your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Passepartout by Passepartout and protel PMS by Planet aim to streamline hotel management but differ significantly in features, support, and overall market presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs—so which one aligns better with your goals?
This comparison will help you evaluate their core strengths and weaknesses to make an informed choice.
Passepartout and protel PMS are both designed to handle hotel operations, but their approaches and maturity differ. Passepartout’s ratings are nonexistent and its review count is zero, reflecting a lack of recent user feedback and a limited market footprint. Meanwhile, protel PMS boasts over 105 reviews, with a recent surge in feedback, making it the more tested and reliable choice.
While Passepartout claims to be comprehensive, its lack of user reviews suggests limited adoption or unresolved issues. Protel’s higher review volume and recent reviews demonstrate ongoing customer engagement and product evolution—so is your hotel ready for a more proven solution?
If your hotel requires a feature-rich, scalable PMS with a global presence and extensive integrations, go with protel PMS. Its broad ecosystem supports sophisticated revenue management, multi-currency handling, and comprehensive guest profiles—ideal for medium to large hotels or chains.
Conversely, if your hotel operates on a single property or a minimal setup and prefers a straightforward, perhaps less feature-dense system, Passepartout might seem attractive for its simplicity. However, given its zero reviews and limited data, protel’s proven track record makes it the safer choice for most hotels aiming for growth and reliability.
Protel PMS scores a 4.12/5 for ease of use, backed by 105 recent reviews praising its user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and effective staff adoption. Reviewers mention that support is generally responsive and the platform is intuitive, making daily management smoother.
Passepartout’s ratings are unavailable, and with no reviews to assess, its ease of use remains unknown. Without recent user feedback, it’s difficult to determine if Passepartout provides a seamless experience. Edge: protel PMS.
Protel PMS offers more than 46 features, including revenue management, integrated booking engine, multi-lingual support, guest CRM, digital registration, and real-time reporting—features that are absent in Passepartout, which has no unique features listed.
Passepartout’s lack of verified features signals a limited offering, while protel’s extensive modules address every stage of guest management and revenue optimization. When it comes to feature depth, protel clearly leads. Edge: protel PMS.
Protel PMS has a support rating of 3.95/5, with recent reviews highlighting reliable, 24/7 support and efficient onboarding. Guests praise its helpful responsiveness and proactive communication, fostering trust and smooth implementation.
Passepartout’s support ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, its support quality remains uncertain. Given the active customer engagement with protel, it offers a more dependable support experience. Edge: protel PMS.
Protel PMS boasts over 195 verified integrations, including popular systems like RMS, CRM, channel managers, booking engines, and payments. This extensive ecosystem enables seamless connectivity and automation.
Passepartout has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems or customize. For hotels seeking flexibility and scalability, protel’s ecosystem is a decisive advantage. Edge: protel PMS.
Protel PMS has a 4.11/5 overall rating from 105 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability, feature set, and support. Independent hotels, boutique properties, and city center hotels particularly rate it highly, with some reviews mentioning significant operational improvements.
Passepartout’s rating remains at zero, indicating no recent user feedback or confirmed customer satisfaction. Based on available data, protel’s higher and recent ratings make it the more trusted solution. Edge: protel PMS.
Passepartout’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it might not follow a conventional SaaS model or lacks recent market presence. In contrast, protel PMS costs $500 monthly, with no free tier or trial available.
Given the premium price and transparent structure of protel PMS, your hotel can better evaluate ROI and plan budget accordingly. Passepartout’s unclear pricing makes it difficult to assess value.
Since Passepartout offers no recent reviews or verified features, it’s best suited for very basic property management needs where complex automation or multi-property management aren’t priorities.
Protel is designed for hotels that want a flexible, scalable system supported by a large ecosystem and ongoing updates.
The core difference lies in their maturity and market presence: protel PMS is well-established, with a proven track record and extensive features, while Passepartout remains virtually unreviewed and unspecified in capabilities.
If your hotel values reliability, integrations, and ongoing support, protel PMS outperforms Passepartout convincingly. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and broad ecosystem make it the safer, more flexible investment.
Choose protel PMS if your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform with active user feedback and proven performance. It suits properties of all sizes, especially those ready to grow and integrate.
Opt for Passepartout only if your needs are exceedingly simple, your property is small, and you prefer a basic system without the necessity of advanced features or extensive support.
In summary: protel PMS offers a more mature, reliable, and feature-rich solution supported by recent reviews and active customer engagement. Passepartout’s lack of recent data and features makes it a risky choice for hotels looking to modernize and scale their operations efficiently.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Passepartout |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Passepartout and protel PMS (by Planet) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Passepartout |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Passepartout and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Passepartout offers 0 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Passepartout: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Passepartout has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor