The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 83 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Nets shines .
straiv shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
Side-by-side ratings based on 83 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 83 |
After analyzing 83 verified reviews, Nets users most value its , while straiv users highlight digital check-in and check-out, guest communication and customization, ease of implementation and use. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Nets |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Digital check-in and check-out
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest communication and customization
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of implementation and use
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous improvement and updates
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Payment process issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Nets |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 27 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 41 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 8 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #5 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Nets |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 28 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #4 18 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Nets |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #16 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #2 79 reviews |
Choosing between Nets’ Payments system and straiv hinges on what your hotel needs most for contactless check-in. While Nets offers a foundational payments solution, straiv provides a comprehensive digital guest journey platform. Both aim to streamline guest arrivals, but they serve different levels of hotel digitalization. Are you looking for a simple payment system or a full-service contactless experience?
If your goal is to implement a straightforward payments process without extensive integration, Nets may seem appealing. However, straiv’s broader feature set and recent popularity make it the more compelling choice for hotels prioritizing guest engagement and operational efficiency. Which one better aligns with your hotel’s digital strategy?
Nets, as a payments system, aims to facilitate contactless transactions but offers no additional guest engagement features. Its review count remains zero, and recent feedback is unavailable, making its reliability uncertain. Conversely, straiv has accumulated over 80 reviews, with recent feedback in the last six months, making its user experience more validated.
Straiv’s high overall score of 74/100, ease of use rating of 4.69/5, and NPS of 9.51/10 reflect widespread satisfaction. Its feature list surpasses Nets by offering mobile check-in, messaging, upselling, PMS integration, and more—making it a more versatile solution. Are you ready to prioritize features that improve both guest satisfaction and operational management?
If your hotel needs a robust contactless check-in platform with extensive functionalities, go with straiv. Its ability to handle online check-in/out, guest messaging, room service ordering, and integrations with PMS systems like Oracle makes it suitable for mid-sized and larger hotels seeking a digital transformation.
Nets might be suitable if your focus is solely on implementing a payments solution without additional guest engagement features. However, with a $500 monthly fee and no verified integrations or recent reviews, its value remains uncertain. For hotels aiming for a seamless digital guest journey, straiv’s comprehensive approach makes it the clearer choice.
Nets currently has no ratings or reviews for ease of use, so its user-friendliness remains unverified. Straiv, with a rating of 4.69/5 from 81 reviews, is praised for its intuitive design and straightforward onboarding process. Users note that staff and guests find the system easy to navigate, citing its minimal learning curve.
Recent reviews mention that straiv’s support team helps with onboarding and troubleshooting, ensuring quick adoption. Given the lack of data on Nets’ usability, edge: straiv.
Nets offers no verified features beyond payment processing, leaving its capabilities largely undefined. In contrast, straiv boasts 19 unique features, including mobile check-in/out, digital concierge, guest messaging, PMS integration, room service ordering, and ID verification—covering the entire guest digital journey.
These features are designed to minimize manual work, increase guest satisfaction, and streamline operations. Straiv’s broader feature set offers more flexibility and control, making it the superior choice for hotels seeking an all-in-one contactless solution. Edge: straiv.
Nets provides no available data on customer support or onboarding, making it impossible to evaluate their service quality. Straiv, on the other hand, scores 4.72/5 in support ratings, with recent reviews praising its quick response and proactive assistance.
Users frequently mention that the support team is helpful during implementation and ongoing use, which enhances confidence in the product. Given the lack of support data for Nets, edge: straiv.
Nets has no verified integrations, potentially limiting its ability to connect with existing hotel systems. Straiv integrates with 36 verified partners, including key systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Protel, and hotelkit, offering extensive compatibility.
This broad integration ecosystem allows hotels to automate processes, synchronize data, and improve operational flow. For hotels seeking a connected, efficient system, straiv’s integrations provide a significant advantage. Edge: straiv.
With zero reviews, Nets remains unverified in guest or hoteliers’ ratings. Straiv, based on over 80 recent reviews, earns a high overall score of 74/100 and a NPS of 9.51/10, with most users rating it 4.8/5.
Hotels across various segments—independent, boutique, city center, and serviced apartments—rate straiv highly, praising its ease of use and support. The data clearly favors straiv in user satisfaction. Edge: straiv.
Nets does not disclose pricing, leaving potential buyers in the dark. Straiv charges $500 per month, with no free tier or trial available, making it a predictable investment for hotels ready to digitize.
While the cost may seem significant for small properties, the extensive feature set and support justify the price for hotels seeking a full guest journey platform. Given the value and transparency, straiv offers clearer cost expectations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in scope: Nets offers a basic payments mechanism, while straiv provides a comprehensive contactless guest platform. Straiv’s higher recent review count and ratings give it a clear edge in proven user satisfaction and feature completeness.
Choose Nets if your priority is a simple, no-frills payment solution with minimal implementation. Opt for straiv if your hotel wants a versatile platform that boosts guest satisfaction, operational efficiency, and system integrations—making it the smarter investment for modern hotels.
In conclusion, straiv’s extensive features, recent high reviews, and integration capabilities make it the better choice for hotels serious about digital guest experiences. Nets’ limited scope and lack of recent reviews make it less suitable unless you’re only after a simple contactless payment system. Your decision should align with your hotel’s digital goals and the level of guest engagement you wish to provide.
According to HTR's product database, Payments system and straiv share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Nets |
|
|---|---|---|
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Local Recommendations | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Mobile Checkout | ||
| Room Service Ordering | ||
| Web-app |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Digital check-in and check-out are praised for significantly reducing waiting times for guests and administrative burdens for staff. Reviews emphasize... Digital check-in and check-out are praised for significantly reducing waiting times for guests and administrative burdens for staff. Reviews emphasize the benefits of contactless processes, especially during the COVID-19 era, providing guests with seamless and flexible arrivals and departures, while ensuring compliance with health safety protocols.
Users appreciate the ability to communicate directly with guests through journey mailing and other customizable modules. This facilitates timely infor... Users appreciate the ability to communicate directly with guests through journey mailing and other customizable modules. This facilitates timely information exchange, promotional offers, and enhances overall guest satisfaction. Reviews laud the flexibility in designing guest interactions based on individual hotel needs.
Straiv receives high marks for the ease with which its system can be implemented, requiring no advanced IT skills. Reviews consistently mention the to... Straiv receives high marks for the ease with which its system can be implemented, requiring no advanced IT skills. Reviews consistently mention the tool's intuitive user interface, making it easy for both staff and guests to interact with the system.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users report issues with the payment processing feature, such as delays and incomplete data transfers. Improvements in integrating multiple payme... Some users report issues with the payment processing feature, such as delays and incomplete data transfers. Improvements in integrating multiple payment gateways are suggested to enhance efficiency and reliability.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Payments system and straiv share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Payments system offers 0 verified integration partners, while straiv offers 37. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. straiv leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Payments system: No. straiv: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Nets has an HT Score of 0 and straiv has 73. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor