The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Payone shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, Payone users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Payone |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Payone |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Payone |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Payone |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing between Payone by Payone and Zil Money by Zil Money hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to streamline payment processing, but their capabilities and user experiences differ markedly. Payone offers no recent reviews, lacks features, and has no ratings, making it unviable for most hotels. Zil Money, meanwhile, boasts a sizable review base, recent feedback, and a broad feature set. Which one truly adds value to your operations?
The core difference lies in their market presence and feature depth. Payone remains obscure with zero reviews, no features, and no integrations, suggesting it’s either not operational or not suitable for hotel use. Zil Money has over 50 recent reviews, a 4.5/5 ease of use score, and a robust set of features, making it the clear choice for hotels seeking reliable payment tools.
Payone appears to be an underdeveloped product with no reviews or ratings, signaling it likely isn’t suitable for hotel payment needs. Zil Money, by contrast, has a solid 62.9 HTR score based on 54 reviews, all within the last six months, indicating active use and recent customer feedback.
While Payone offers no features or integrations, Zil Money provides 15 features including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, and acceptance of multiple payment methods like Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Paypal. This extensive feature set addresses a wide range of hotel payment scenarios from international transactions to contactless payments.
Are you prepared to rely on a product with no user feedback or established functionality? Or does Zil Money’s recent reviews and feature depth make it the safer, more comprehensive choice?
If your hotel needs a full-featured financial management platform with solid user reviews and active support, Zil Money is the clear winner. It suits hotels that prioritize ease of online payments, multi-currency transactions, and integrations with popular payment methods. Its 4.5/5 ease of use rating, recent reviews, and a score of 62.9 confirm its reliability for hotels of various sizes.
If, on the other hand, your hotel has minimal payment processing requirements or is cautious about adopting newer platforms without reviews, Payone’s lack of data makes it an unlikely candidate. Its zero ratings and no features indicate it offers little value or assurance for your team.
In essence, Zil Money is ideal for hotels that want a trusted, comprehensive payments solution with proven customer satisfaction. Payone, with zero evidence of quality or support, shouldn’t be on your shortlist.
Payone has no reviews, no ratings, and no data on ease of use, suggesting it’s either not operational or not user-friendly at present. Zil Money, however, earns a 4.5/5 rating based on 54 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward payment processes.
Reviewers highlight Zil Money’s user-centric design, which simplifies invoice management, payment scheduling, and multi-entity handling. Its onboarding process is rated 4.16/5, indicating most users find it accessible and easy to implement. Conversely, Payone’s lack of feedback leaves its usability status uncertain.
Edge: Zil Money.
Payone offers no features or integrations, making it unsuitable for hotels needing a comprehensive payments platform. Zil Money, on the other hand, provides 15 features including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, Contactless Payments, Payment Splitting, and support for various payment methods like Paypal, Apple Pay, and American Express.
This broad feature set addresses diverse hotel payment scenarios, from international billing to contactless checkouts. The platform's additional capabilities such as Partial Capture and Authorization Adjustments offer operational flexibility, unlike Payone’s nonexistent feature list.
Edge: Zil Money.
Payone has no ratings or reviews regarding support, indicating a lack of publicly available customer feedback or possibly limited support resources. Zil Money supports this with a 4.5/5 customer support rating based on recent reviews from 54 users, many praising its responsiveness and professional assistance.
Review quotes mention quick resolution times and helpfulness, although some users suggest room for improving communication speed. Overall, Zil Money’s support is rated highly, making it more dependable for hotels that value responsive service.
Edge: Zil Money.
Payone provides zero verified integrations or partner connections, which constrains its usability within existing hotel systems. Zil Money, despite having no verified third-party integrations listed, supports API access, allowing custom integrations that can connect with hotel management software and accounting tools.
While neither platform boasts a large ecosystem of integrations, Zil Money’s API capability offers room for expansion and flexibility, unlike Payone’s complete lack of integration options.
Edge: Zil Money.
With 54 recent reviews and a 62.9 score, Zil Money is clearly favored by hotel users, who rate it highly for ease of use, customer support, and functionality. Payone, with no reviews or ratings, cannot be rated, and its viability remains unverified.
Hotels across segments like luxury, boutique, and mid-size properties have expressed satisfaction with Zil Money’s platform, citing it as reliable and straightforward. Its recent feedback and consistent ratings make it the preferred choice.
Edge: Zil Money.
Payone’s pricing details are unavailable, which is common for underdeveloped or non-operational platforms. Zil Money charges a $400 base fee, with no freemium or tiered monthly options, and offers a 15-day free trial.
Considering its feature-rich platform, Zil Money’s upfront cost may be justified for hotels seeking comprehensive payment solutions. The lack of transparent pricing for Payone makes it difficult to evaluate its value.
Given the lack of reviews and features, Payone is better suited for experimentation rather than operational use.
Zil Money’s broad feature set and recent positive feedback make it suitable for hotels of all sizes aiming for reliable, scalable payment management.
Zil Money stands out as a fully operational, highly-rated payments platform with recent reviews and an extensive feature set. Its user-friendly interface, strong customer support, and flexible payment options make it the clear choice for most hotels.
Payone, with no reviews, no features, and no support data, appears to be either non-existent or not ready for hotel use. Unless your hotel operates in a very limited, in-person capacity, Zil Money should be your go-to.
If you need a trusted, feature-rich payments solution with recent positive feedback, choose Zil Money. For experimental or minimal needs, Payone’s unproven platform is not advisable.
According to HTR's product database, Payone and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Payone |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Payone and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Payone offers 0 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Payone: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Payone has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor