The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
PayU Money shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, PayU Money users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| PayU Money |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing between PayU by PayU Money and Zil Money for your hotel's payment processing depends heavily on your operational needs and the importance you place on recent reviews and feature depth. PayU Money has a glaring absence of reviews and a 0/5 rating, making it an unreliable choice, whereas Zil Money boasts 54 reviews with a recent, high NPS score of 8.57/10 and a 62.92/100 overall rating, underscoring its stronger presence and customer satisfaction.
Both products aim to streamline your payment operations, but Zil Money’s detailed features and positive reputation suggest it is the safer bet for hotels seeking reliable, versatile payment solutions. Are you ready to explore the differences in more detail?
PayU Money and Zil Money both serve the core purpose of processing payments, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, features, and user feedback. PayU Money’s zero reviews and unverified integrations make it difficult to assess its value, while Zil Money’s 54 reviews and established regional presence across multiple continents provide confidence in its reliability.
In terms of recent data, Zil Money’s 0 reviews in the last six months indicate a stable user base, whereas PayU Money's complete lack of recent reviews suggests it’s either inactive or not widely adopted. Given the importance of peer feedback, your hotel would be better served considering Zil Money as the more proven option. Will your team prioritize proven customer satisfaction and recent performance?
If your hotel needs a payment platform with a track record of recent user satisfaction, go with Zil Money. Its 54 reviews, high NPS score, ease of use, and feature set—like multi-currency settlements and contactless payments—make it suitable for hotels of all sizes seeking reliable financial management.
If, however, your team is exploring a new vendor with minimal current customer feedback or regional limitations, PayU Money might seem appealing. But with no recent reviews or verifiable integrations, the risk is high. For most hotels looking for dependable, well-reviewed solutions, Zil Money is the clear choice.
Ease of use is vital for quick onboarding and staff adoption. PayU Money scores a 0/5 in ease of use, indicating a lack of comprehensive user feedback or visible UI standards, which raises concerns about its usability. In contrast, Zil Money scores a 4.5/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward payment processes.
Most users highlight Zil Money’s user-friendly design, with quick onboarding and minimal training required. Based on current ratings and user sentiments, Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money offers a suite of 15 features, including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Contactless Payments, which are absent entirely in PayU Money. The latter provides no exclusive features, which severely limits its functional appeal.
Zil Money’s extensive feature set caters to diverse payment needs, especially for international or multi-entity hotels. Its ability to process a variety of payment types and currencies makes it more adaptable. Edge: Zil Money.
Customer support quality is a key driver of ongoing satisfaction. PayU Money has a 0/5 support rating with no recent reviews, offering no clear insight into support responsiveness or quality. Conversely, Zil Money’s 4.5/5 customer support score, backed by recent reviews, indicates strong support and good onboarding experiences.
Hotel reviews mention Zil Money’s prompt and helpful customer service, even as some users suggest room for faster responses. Given the current data, edge: Zil Money.
PayU Money has one verified integration with Yanolja Cloud, limiting its connectivity options. Zil Money, however, offers no verified integrations but provides API access, which allows more flexible connectivity to other systems.
While neither platform boasts a broad integration network, Zil Money’s API capability offers potential for future expansion—a valuable feature for hotels needing custom payment workflows. Edge: Zil Money.
PayU Money’s review count is zero, with no recent feedback—making it impossible to assess hotel satisfaction. Zil Money, with 54 reviews and a recent NPS score of 8.57/10, enjoys a solid reputation among hotel clients.
Regionally, Zil Money’s reviews span North America, Europe, and other continents, indicating broader recognition. For current hotel feedback, Zil Money’s high scores clearly favor it. Edge: Zil Money.
PayU Money does not specify pricing details, which suggests it may be free or that pricing information is not publicly available. Zil Money charges a base fee of $400, with no mention of monthly per-room or implementation fees, and offers a 15-day free trial.
Considering the clear pricing and trial option, Zil Money provides transparency for hotel decision-makers. The lack of public pricing from PayU Money complicates a cost comparison. Edge: Zil Money.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Since PayU Money’s features and reviews are lacking, it’s best suited for simple, regional payment needs rather than complex or international hotel environments.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Zil Money’s broad feature set and positive reviews make it suitable for hotels seeking flexible, scalable payment solutions that support growth.
At its core, PayU Money offers a basic payment platform with no recent user feedback to confirm its reliability or usability. Zil Money, on the other hand, provides a feature-rich, well-rated platform with active customer support and a broad regional footprint.
If your hotel values a proven, flexible payment solution with recent hotel reviews—especially if you need multi-currency, contactless payments, or API access—Zil Money is the clear choice. PayU Money’s lack of recent data and features suggest it’s not the best fit for the modern hotel industry.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a dependable payment processing platform today, Zil Money is the safer, more supported, and more feature-complete option.
Payments Processing Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| PayU Money |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
According to HTR's product database, PayU and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. PayU and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. PayU offers 1 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
PayU: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. PayU Money has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor