The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
PayU Money shines .
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 69 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 69 |
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, PayU Money users most value its , while ROH users highlight automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| PayU Money |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 21 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 28 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 61 reviews |
| Europe | — | #3 1 reviews |
Choosing a payments processing platform for your hotel hinges on your operational needs, regional presence, and the importance of user experience. PayU Money and ROH both serve the hotel industry, but their core offerings and market presence differ significantly. PayU Money appears to be a minimal or placeholder solution with no recent reviews or ratings, whereas ROH boasts a robust profile with extensive features, recent positive reviews, and high user ratings. Given the data, which product truly supports your hotel’s payment needs?
PayU Money currently has no reviews, ratings, or active user feedback to validate its capabilities or user experience. Its absence of recent reviews suggests it might not be a viable option for hotels seeking reliable, well-supported payment solutions. Conversely, ROH has over 65 reviews in the past six months, with a high NPS score of 9.91 and a 4.97/5 support rating, indicating consistent positive user experiences. The recent reviews highlight ease of use, automation, and real-time reporting, all critical for streamlining hotel payments.
While PayU Money claims to offer payment processing, the lack of detailed features, recent user feedback, or market presence makes it difficult to endorse. ROH’s active, recent reviews and high customer satisfaction clearly position it as the stronger choice. Are you willing to rely on a product with no recent validation, or does the proven track record of ROH better meet your hotel’s needs?
If your hotel needs an established, feature-rich payments platform with proven user satisfaction, go with ROH. Its extensive feature set—including refunds, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, and support for multiple payment methods—makes it suitable for mid-to-large hotels, resorts, and hotel groups. Its recent reviews confirm it simplifies complex payment workflows and reduces manual errors.
If, however, your hotel is a small property or you’re exploring basic payment processing without the need for advanced features, PayU Money might seem appealing. But given its lack of recent reviews, minimal feature details, and no validation from current users, it’s not a reliable choice. For most hotels prioritizing operational efficiency and customer satisfaction, ROH is the clear winner.
ROH’s user interface scores near perfect at 4.95/5, with reviews praising its intuitive design and straightforward workflows. Hotel staff find it simple to process payments, generate invoices, and manage schedules, leading to less training and fewer errors. The onboarding process also receives high marks, with a score of 4.92/5, indicating a smooth implementation experience.
PayU Money’s ratings are at zero, with no recent feedback or support data to assess ease of use, leaving uncertainty about its UI or onboarding. The absence of reviews suggests it may lack the user-centric design and support infrastructure that ROH provides. Based on available data, edge: ROH.
ROH offers 19 distinct features, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, pay-by-link options, installment plans, and support for Apple Pay, Google Pay, Visa, and American Express. These functionalities cater to diverse hotel operational needs and payment scenarios, enhancing flexibility and control.
PayU Money provides no listed features or detailed functionality information, making it impossible to compare. Its lack of features or recent user validation diminishes its appeal. Clearly, edge: ROH.
ROH’s support ratings are outstanding at 4.97/5, with reviews emphasizing supportive onboarding and prompt assistance. Users cite “support staff is great” and appreciate ongoing help during implementation and usage, which is critical for complex payment integrations.
PayU Money, with a 0/5 rating and no recent reviews, offers no concrete support data. Its lack of recent feedback suggests limited or unverified support quality. Based on user ratings and reviews, edge: ROH.
ROH provides integrations with Yanolja Cloud Solution and Oracle Hospitality, along with a total of one verified partner. Its open architecture and extensive features make it adaptable for different hotel systems, although it could improve on integration breadth.
PayU Money also has a single verified partner, but with minimal detail and no other listed integrations, limiting its flexibility. Given the more recent activity and broader feature set of ROH, edge: ROH.
ROH’s recent reviews and high ratings (4.95/5 for ease of use, 4.97/5 support, and a 9.91/5 NPS) reflect strong satisfaction, especially among luxury and resort hotels. The feedback emphasizes its simplicity, automation, and positive user experience, reinforcing its value.
PayU Money has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. The absence of recent feedback strongly indicates that ROH is the preferred choice among hoteliers. Edge: ROH.
PayU Money’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it might operate on a custom or undisclosed model. ROH charges a base price of $100 per month, with no additional implementation or per-room fees, making it transparent and predictable.
Given the lack of pricing transparency for PayU Money, and the straightforward fee structure of ROH, the latter offers more clarity and better value for hotels investing in payment infrastructure.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ROH stands out with its comprehensive features, recent positive reviews, and high satisfaction ratings, making it a solid choice for hotels seeking a reliable payments platform. Its automation tools, support, and user-friendly design help streamline financial operations and improve guest experiences.
PayU Money, lacking recent validation, sparse features, and support data, appears unsuitable for most hotel operations. Unless your hotel operates in a region with specific needs aligning with PayU’s offerings, ROH is the safer, more proven investment.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, highly-rated payments platform that simplifies operations and supports growth, choose ROH. For minimal or basic payment needs, and if regionally appropriate, PayU Money may suffice — but caution is advised given the lack of recent support and reviews.
Payments Processing Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| PayU Money |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, PayU and ROH share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Refund Management |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. PayU and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. PayU offers 1 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
PayU: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. PayU Money has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor