The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Pelecard shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, Pelecard users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Pelecard |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Pelecard |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Pelecard |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Pelecard |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel can significantly affect your operational efficiency, guest experience, and bottom line. Pelecard and Zil Money aim to streamline your payment processes, but they diverge sharply in terms of maturity, capabilities, and user feedback. Based on current data, which platform truly aligns with your hotel’s needs?
Zil Money is the clear choice here, boasting a robust review base—54 recent reviews—and a high user satisfaction score of 87%. Pelecard, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or ratings, making its claims difficult to verify. If recent user feedback and proven support matter, Zil Money is the safer bet.
Both Pelecard and Zil Money aim to facilitate secure, efficient payment processing for hotels, but they differ substantially in market presence and feature sets. Pelecard appears to be an obscure platform with no recent reviews, no verified integrations, and an absence of publicly available features or regional presence. This makes it hard to assess its real-world performance or suitability for hotel operations.
In contrast, Zil Money has a well-established presence across multiple continents—North America, South America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East, and Africa—and over 50 reviews in the past six months. Hotel clients praise its ease of use, reliability, and comprehensive financial features, making it a more transparent choice.
Do you prioritize a platform with proven, recent support and broad regional coverage? If so, Zil Money stands out. If you’re considering Pelecard, you should question its support, feature set, and whether it can meet your hotel’s needs at scale.
If your hotel needs a payment processing platform that supports multiple currencies, offers diverse payment options like Apple Pay, Google Pay, and PayPal, and has extensive recent reviews, go with Zil Money. Its features—including recurring payments, partial captures, and contactless payments—are all designed to handle complex hotel transactions efficiently.
If, however, your hotel primarily seeks a straightforward, perhaps niche, payment solution with minimal or no need for multi-currency support, Pelecard could theoretically suffice. Yet, its lack of recent reviews, absence of verified features, and zero reported integrations make it a risky choice for a hospitality business aiming for reliable, scalable payment processing.
The decision is clear: Zil Money’s established presence and active user base give it the edge. Pelecard’s current lack of verifiable data renders it unsuitable for most hotel operations.
Zil Money’s user-friendly interface scores high, with a 4.5/5 ease of use rating and detailed positive reviews emphasizing its simplicity and quick onboarding. Guests and hotel staff find it straightforward to process payments, set up recurring transactions, and manage multiple accounts.
Pelecard’s usability is unverified, with a zero-star rating and no recent reviews to draw from. The absence of user feedback or UI data leaves its ease of use in question.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money offers 15 distinct features, including pay-by-link, recurring payments, multi-currency settlements, Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal acceptance, contactless payments, and payment splitting—features heavily relevant for hotel environments. In comparison, Pelecard provides no verified features or integrations.
Pelecard’s lack of documented capabilities makes it impossible to compare meaningfully. Zil Money’s rich feature set and flexibility clearly give it the advantage for hotels seeking comprehensive payment options.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s customer support scores 4.5/5, with recent reviews citing reliable assistance and straightforward onboarding. Users report quick responses and helpful guidance, which are critical for hotel operations that require swift issue resolution.
Pelecard’s support rating remains at zero, with no recent reviews or feedback available. Without recent user experiences, assessing Pelecard’s support quality is impossible.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money has zero verified integrations but offers API access, allowing for potential customization and third-party connections. Pelecard similarly shows no verified partners or integrations, with no available data on connectivity options.
In the absence of verified partnerships, both platforms fall short of expectations for hotels that rely on seamless integrations with PMS, accounting, or revenue management systems. However, Zil Money’s API support provides a foundation for future expansion, giving it a slight edge.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s recent reviews depict a generally positive sentiment, with an 87% likelihood to recommend and a high satisfaction score. Hotels across multiple segments, including luxury and budget categories, find its features and support satisfactory.
Pelecard has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its reputation unverified. Without feedback, hotels should favor a platform with proven performance.
Edge: Zil Money.
Pelecard’s pricing details are unavailable; it appears to lack a clear or publicly advertised pricing model. Zil Money charges a $400 base fee, with no mention of monthly per-room costs or implementation fees, and offers a 15-day free trial.
Given the transparency and straightforward pricing, Zil Money provides better clarity for hotels budgeting for payment processing.
Not ideal if you need reliable support, multiple currency processing, or advanced features.
Not ideal if you prefer a platform without API support or are operating in regions outside Zil Money’s current presence.
Zil Money is the more mature, reviewed, and trusted platform, especially given its 54 recent reviews and high satisfaction rates. Its broad feature set, ease of use, and active support make it suitable for most hotel environments.
Pelecard, lacking recent data, reviews, and verified features, cannot confidently meet the demands of modern hotel operations. Unless your hotel operates in a very niche market with minimal payment needs, Pelecard does not present a compelling choice.
In conclusion, for hotels prioritizing proven support, extensive features, and reliable performance, Zil Money is the clear winner. Pelecard’s absence of verifiable recent data makes it an unreliable option at this stage.
According to HTR's product database, Pelecard and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Pelecard |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Pelecard and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Pelecard offers 0 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Pelecard: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Pelecard has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor