The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Pelecard shines .
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 69 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 69 |
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, Pelecard users most value its , while ROH users highlight automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Pelecard |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Pelecard |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 21 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Pelecard |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 28 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Pelecard |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 61 reviews |
| Europe | — | #3 1 reviews |
When selecting a payments processing software for your hotel, your goal is to find a solution that’s reliable, easy to use, and integrates smoothly into your operations. Pelecard by Pelecard and ROH serve this purpose but approach it very differently. Pelecard offers a payment platform with zero recent reviews and no evident features, while ROH provides a comprehensive, well-reviewed system with a strong market presence. The choice hinges on your priorities: do you need simplicity or a feature-rich platform?
Pelecard appears to be an outdated or less-supported option, with no recent review activity or visible features. Conversely, ROH has 65 reviews in the last six months, a near-perfect rating for ease of use and support, and a clear set of features. Would you prefer a platform with proven usability and ongoing support or one with no current market validation?
Pelecard and ROH aim to streamline hotel payments, but they do so in contrasting ways. Pelecard’s lack of recent reviews, features, or integrations suggests it may no longer be a viable or supported solution for hotels seeking reliable payment processing. ROH, on the other hand, boasts a high NPS score of 9.91/10, a 99% likelihood to recommend, and 65 recent reviews, indicating strong customer satisfaction.
If your hotel needs a user-friendly platform with recent updates and active support, ROH is clearly the stronger choice. Pelecard’s absence of recent activity makes it difficult to trust it can meet modern hotel payment demands. Are you prepared to invest in a platform with proven recent performance or settle for an unsupported solution?
For hotels prioritizing ease of use, customer support, and ongoing updates, ROH is the clear winner, evidenced by its 4.95/5 ease of use and 4.97/5 support ratings. Its 19 unique features—including refund management, pre-authorizations, and multiple payment options—offer flexibility that Pelecard cannot match, given its zero features and no recent activity.
If your hotel values automation, multiple integrations, and a proven track record, go with ROH. If you’re simply seeking a payment processor without critical features or recent validation, Pelecard might suffice—but it’s unlikely to support your growth or operational needs. Do you want a platform that evolves with your hotel’s needs or one that’s unlikely to keep pace?
ROH’s 4.95/5 ease of use rating outperforms Pelecard’s 0/5 by a wide margin, reflecting its intuitive interface and positive user feedback. ROH’s onboarding process scores 4.92/5, and users frequently highlight its simplicity and support, with many describing it as “extremely user friendly” and “easy to comprehend.”
In contrast, Pelecard offers no data on ease of use, suggesting it may be outdated or unsupported. For your team to adopt a new payment system swiftly and confidently, ROH’s proven usability is the clear advantage. Edge: ROH.
ROH offers 19 distinct features, including refund management, payment splitting, recurring payments, and acceptance of multiple major credit cards and digital wallets. Pelecard provides no features documented or available, which severely limits its functionality.
If your hotel requires advanced payment capabilities like installment plans, chargeback management, or PCI compliance, ROH’s feature set is essential. Pelecard’s lack of features makes it unsuitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive, flexible payments platform. Edge: ROH.
ROH’s customer support scores a near-perfect 4.97/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and support staff. Reviewers describe support as “great,” “helpful,” and “easy to reach,” making onboarding and troubleshooting smooth.
Pelecard has no recent reviews or support ratings, raising doubts about its current support quality or even ongoing availability. For your team’s peace of mind and quick problem resolution, ROH’s support is clearly superior. Edge: ROH.
ROH has one verified integration with Oracle Hospitality, while Pelecard has none. Although limited, ROH’s integration with a major hospitality system signals a commitment to compatibility with hotel operations.
If your hotel relies on specific PMS or sales systems, ROH’s existing integration provides a foundation for smoother workflows. Pelecard’s lack of integrations makes it an unlikely candidate for hotels seeking seamless system connectivity. Edge: ROH.
ROH’s recent reviews show a 9.91/10 NPS score and a 99% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong satisfaction across various hotel segments. The reviews highlight its ease of use, automation, and support as key strengths, especially among luxury and boutique hotels.
Pelecard’s review absence leaves it untested in current hotel contexts, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. Given the consistent positive feedback for ROH and recent activity, hoteliers clearly rate ROH higher. Edge: ROH.
Pelecard’s pricing details are unavailable, and it offers no free trial or transparent fee structure, suggesting it may be outdated or no longer marketed. ROH charges a straightforward $100 monthly fee, with no implementation or additional setup costs, providing clarity in budgeting.
For hotels planning for predictable expenses, ROH’s transparent pricing simplifies decision-making. Pelecard’s opaque pricing and lack of recent activity make it a risky investment without knowing true costs. Edge: ROH.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ROH’s core advantage lies in its extensive features, recent reviews, and strong support, making it ideal for hotels that need automation and reliability. Its proven track record and positive hotel ratings suggest it will continue to serve your needs as your property grows.
Pelecard, by contrast, seems inactive and lacks features or recent validation, making it unsuitable for modern hotels. If you want a payment platform that supports your current and future needs, ROH is the clear choice.
Choose ROH if your hotel prioritizes usability, features, and support. Consider Pelecard only if you are comfortable with an unsupported solution that may not keep pace with industry standards.
According to HTR's product database, Pelecard and ROH share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Pelecard |
|
|---|---|---|
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Refund Management |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Pelecard and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Pelecard offers 0 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Pelecard: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Pelecard has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor