The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Megasys shines .
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Megasys users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Megasys |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Megasys |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Megasys |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Megasys |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Portfolio HMS by Megasys and protel PMS by Planet aim to streamline your management tasks, but they diverge significantly in scope, user feedback, and market presence. Megasys’s Portfolio HMS has no recent reviews or ratings, indicating limited recent adoption or ongoing support. Conversely, Planet’s protel boasts over 100 reviews in the last six months, with high ratings and positive user sentiment. Which system truly aligns with your hotel’s needs?
Portfolio HMS and protel PMS are designed to solve core hotel management challenges—reserving rooms, managing guest data, and automating operations. Portfolio HMS, developed by Megasys, presents itself as a comprehensive management platform, but it lacks recent user reviews and measurable customer feedback, raising questions about ongoing support and development. protel PMS, on the other hand, delivers a broad suite of features supported by a large user base actively reviewing the product, especially in recent months. The contrast raises a fundamental question: which platform offers more confidence and proven value today?
If your hotel needs a flexible, customizable management system with a long-standing reputation, Portfolio HMS may seem appealing. However, given the absence of recent reviews and no current user feedback, it’s hard to verify its effectiveness or support quality. If you require a modern, cloud-native PMS with a proven track record, robust features, and active user engagement, protel PMS is the clear choice—especially for hotels needing reliable integrations and ongoing updates. For hoteliers looking for transparency and confidence, the choice is obvious.
Portfolio HMS has no recent reviews or ratings, so its ease of use and onboarding experience are uncertain—potentially a concern for staff adoption. In contrast, protel PMS scores highly for usability, with a user rating of 4.12/5 and recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and efficient onboarding process. Hoteliers report that protel’s platform is straightforward and quick to learn, which minimizes training time and accelerates staff adaptation. Edge: protel PMS.
Portfolio HMS offers no detailed feature list or recent updates, making it impossible to compare its capabilities definitively. On the other hand, protel PMS features over 46 functionalities, including revenue management, multi-currency, booking engine, guest CRM, integrated payments, and digital registration, among others. Its modular, scalable system supports complex operations and integrations. The lack of recent Portfolio HMS features data means protel’s comprehensive feature set provides an undeniable edge.
Portfolio HMS has no recent reviews or support ratings, suggesting limited available feedback on its support quality. Conversely, protel PMS’s support scores a 3.95/5, with recent reviews describing it as responsive and helpful, though some mention occasional delays. Customers appreciate 24/7 support and multilingual assistance, which streamline problem resolution. Given the recent review activity and support ratings, protel offers a support experience you can rely on. Edge: protel PMS.
Portfolio HMS appears to have no verified integrations or partner network, severely limiting its connectivity options. In contrast, protel PMS boasts over 1,200 integrations, including popular systems like RMS, CRM, booking engines, and channel managers—many of which are trusted industry standards. This extensive ecosystem enhances your ability to connect disparate tools, automate workflows, and scale your hotel’s tech stack. Edge: protel PMS.
Portfolio HMS’s lack of recent reviews means there is no current rating or hotel feedback to evaluate. Conversely, protel PMS’s recent reviews, with an 80% likelihood to recommend and a 4.11/5 overall rating, indicate strong customer satisfaction. Hotels of various sizes, especially independent and boutique hotels, praise protel’s reliability and feature set, with many noting improvements in operational efficiency. Clearly, protel’s recent user ratings provide more confidence in its performance. Edge: protel PMS.
Portfolio HMS offers no publicly available pricing details, leaving potential buyers in the dark about costs and value. In contrast, protel PMS charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no trial or freemium options, reflecting a transparent pricing model aligned with its feature-rich platform. This predictable pricing facilitates budgeting and planning for your hotel. Without concrete figures for Portfolio HMS, protel’s transparent costs present a more straightforward decision.
Portfolio HMS by Megasys offers a traditional management solution but lacks recent reviews, making its current performance and support uncertain. If you’re committed to a system with a long history and highly customizable features, it might still hold some appeal—but the absence of recent data is a significant risk.
Protel PMS, supported by over 100 recent reviews and a high user rating, demonstrates proven reliability, extensive integrations, and continuous development. It clearly suits hotels seeking a flexible, scalable, and well-supported platform that adapts as your hotel grows. For most hoteliers, especially those valuing recent user feedback and a broad feature ecosystem, protel is the safer and smarter choice.
In conclusion, your decision should prioritize current user feedback, integration ecosystem, and ongoing support. Given the recent reviews and high satisfaction scores, protel PMS is the recommended platform for modern hotels aiming for operational excellence and guest satisfaction.
According to HTR's product database, Portfolio HMS and protel PMS (by Planet) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Megasys |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Portfolio HMS and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Portfolio HMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Portfolio HMS: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Megasys has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor