The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 496 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Preno shines in Ease of Use and Customer Support — especially for city-center properties (4.9/5), with exclusive features like Drag-n-Drop Tapechart.
RMS shines in support and onboarding help — especially for vacation rental properties (4.4/5), with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 496 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 170 | 326 |
After analyzing 496 verified reviews, Preno users most value its ease of use and staff adoption, housekeeping workflow management, billing and finance reporting, while RMS users highlight support and onboarding help, ease of use and operational efficiency, reporting and custom report writer. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and staff adoption
▾
|
+
Support and onboarding help
▾
|
|
+
Housekeeping workflow management
▾
|
+
Ease of use and operational efficiency
▾
|
|
+
Billing and finance reporting
▾
|
+
Reporting and custom report writer
▾
|
|
+
Integrations and API connectivity
▾
|
+
Reservation and booking management
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Payment flexibility gaps
▾
|
−
Billing, invoicing, and account handling
▾
|
|
−
Paperless check-in
▾
|
−
POS and guest activity integration
▾
|
|
−
Seasonal training and onboarding support
▾
|
−
Mobile access and remote usability
▾
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #14 87 reviews | #7 149 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #35 15 reviews | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #48 1 reviews | #10 17 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 9 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #14 68 reviews | #11 106 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #14 54 reviews | #12 60 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #24 18 reviews | #10 51 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 28 reviews | #3 68 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #28 7 reviews | #11 64 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #29 14 reviews | #22 24 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #22 3 reviews | #13 11 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #17 2 reviews | #8 7 reviews |
Preno and RMS both serve the property management system (PMS) market but target different hotel segments and operational complexities. Preno is built exclusively for independent properties such as boutique hotels, motels, and B&Bs, emphasizing simplicity, ease of use, and seamless integration with accounting tools like Xero. RMS, by contrast, targets a broader hospitality market including RV parks, serviced apartments, resorts, and multi-property groups, offering a more comprehensive and configurable platform with extensive features.
Both systems solve the core hotel operational needs: managing reservations, channels, payments, and guest communication in one platform. Preno excels in reducing admin for smaller, simpler operations with an intuitive interface and centralized dashboards. RMS focuses on supporting complex operations at scale, integrating trust accounting, housekeeping, and multi-property workflows. The choice depends largely on the size, complexity, and growth plans of the property.
If you run an independent property under 50 rooms, especially a boutique hotel, motel, or B&B, Preno’s 4.8 overall rating from 170 reviews and its strong Xero integration make it a top choice. Its user-friendly interface cuts training time and reduces administrative tasks, proven by 68 boutique hotel reviews averaging 4.8/5. However, Preno’s review activity has dropped sharply—down 87% in the last six months—meaning its all-time excellent ratings may not fully reflect the current product state.
For medium to large hotels, multi-property portfolios, resorts, or RV parks, RMS’s 4.2 rating across 326 reviews with 54% fewer recent reviews still signals broad adoption and robustness. RMS offers 45 features Preno lacks, including guest CRM, channel management, housekeeping, and multi-currency support, aiding complex operations. Its scalability is evidenced by clients like Lafayette Hotels deploying 26 properties with RMS. Yet, RMS’s steep learning curve and lower onboarding scores suggest it’s best for teams ready for more complexity.
Data for very small properties (under 10 rooms) or niche segments like serviced apartments is limited for Preno but RMS has a small presence there. For properties needing extensive reporting, automation, and channel management, RMS is better equipped. Preno suits hotels prioritizing simplicity, faster staff adoption, and direct Xero accounting integration.
Preno leads in ease of use with a rating of 4.8 across 170 reviews, compared to RMS’s 4.3 from 326 reviews. Preno users frequently mention its intuitive interface and fast staff training, highlighting drag-and-drop room assignment and clear email communication logs. Reviews emphasize how new employees can become proficient in hours, not days.
RMS, while praised for powerful functionality, has a steeper learning curve and some workflow complexity. Multiple reviewers note the need for more digital learning materials and that some features—like refund processing—are not as user-friendly for frontline staff. Despite this, RMS’s support team helps mitigate challenges, but staff adoption generally takes longer.
Edge: Preno.
RMS offers 45 hotel-relevant features Preno lacks, including guest CRM, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, integrated channel manager, housekeeping modules, point of sale, group booking engine, and guest feedback management. These features support complex daily operations, multi-property management, and diverse guest engagement workflows. For example, RMS’s guest portal and mobile housekeeping app enable operational efficiency and better guest service in larger or multi-faceted properties.
Preno’s only unique feature is a drag-and-drop tape chart, which simplifies room assignment and visual reservation management for smaller properties. While less feature-rich, Preno focuses on streamlining core tasks like booking management and accounting integration.
Given RMS’s broader functionality, especially for larger operations, it is the stronger feature set.
Edge: RMS.
Preno scores 4.8 in customer support and onboarding versus RMS’s 4.5 and 4.1 respectively. Users of Preno praise the responsiveness and personalized support, noting smooth onboarding and helpful assistance during setup. One review highlighted the support team’s willingness to incorporate feature requests promptly.
RMS’s customer support is also rated positively, with multiple mentions of knowledgeable and patient staff. However, some reviews mention delays and a need for more up-to-date help documentation. The onboarding process, while comprehensive, can be complex due to RMS’s feature depth, leading to a longer ramp-up period.
Support quality is strong for both, but Preno’s higher scores and consistent praise for onboarding speed give it the edge.
Edge: Preno.
RMS has a significant advantage in integrations with 118 verified partners compared to Preno’s 17. Both platforms share key channel management and guest engagement partners such as SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate. However, RMS supports industry staples like STR, Sage, Booking.com, and OpenKey, enabling a broader ecosystem for revenue management, accounting, and guest services.
Preno integrates closely with Xero and MYOB for accounting and includes niche integrations like Zingle and HelloShift tailored for independent hotels.
For properties requiring extensive third-party connections, especially larger hotels or multi-property groups, RMS’s integration marketplace offers greater flexibility and scalability.
Edge: RMS.
Preno holds a 4.8 overall rating from 170 reviews, while RMS scores 4.2 across 326 reviews. Preno’s higher ratings are consistent across segments including boutique hotels (4.8/5, 68 reviews), motels (4.8/5, 55 reviews), and luxury hotels (4.8/5, 54 reviews). RMS’s ratings cluster around 4.2 to 4.4 for similar segments but with greater volume—e.g., 106 boutique hotel reviews at 4.2/5, 83 motels at 4.2/5, and 60 luxury hotel reviews at 4.2/5.
Recent review volumes have dropped sharply for both: Preno’s last six months saw only 3 reviews versus a prior average of 23.3 per 6 months (87% decrease), RMS had 7 versus 15.3 (54% decrease). This decline means current ratings may not fully reflect recent product quality or support changes.
Despite RMS’s larger user base, Preno rates higher in overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend (95% vs 85%). Preno’s ratings are more favorable for small to mid-size independent hotels, while RMS’s volume reflects broader, more complex operations.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s base price is $500 with no implementation fee or monthly flat/per-room charges publicly listed. It offers a 30-day trial period. RMS’s base price starts higher at $800, also without implementation fees and no trial. Neither offers freemium or simple per-room monthly models.
For small properties, Preno’s lower entry price and trial may reduce risk. RMS’s pricing aligns with its enterprise feature set and scalability but may be less attractive for smaller independents.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Preno and RMS cater to different hotel operational scales and complexity. Preno is focused on independent, smaller properties seeking an easy-to-use, streamlined PMS with efficient accounting integration and channel management. RMS aims at larger, more complex operations, multi-property groups, and diverse accommodation types with a broad feature set that includes housekeeping, POS, guest CRM, and advanced reporting.
Choose Preno if you operate a boutique hotel or motel under 50 rooms and want a system that is intuitive, fast to train on, and seamlessly integrates with Xero to reduce administrative workload. Its 4.8 rating across 170 reviews and strong support scores back this choice, but note that recent review activity has dropped sharply, which could mean changes in the solution or support that need monitoring.
Choose RMS if you require a highly configurable system to manage multiple properties or complex operations with features like in-house channel management, guest portals, and multi-currency support. RMS’s extensive integrations, scalability, and proven use in medium to large hotel groups make it suitable for properties that can invest in longer onboarding and staff training. Despite a lower overall rating of 4.2, it serves a broader hotel segment and offers capabilities beyond Preno’s reach. Like Preno, RMS’s review volume has also declined recently, so prospective buyers should verify current performance and support responsiveness.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Accounting & Finance
|
|
|
| Direct billing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
|
▾
Marketing & Ecommerce
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration & Configuration
|
|
|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| On premise | ||
|
▾
Customer Management
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Front Office
|
|
|
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Groups Management
|
|
|
| Group functionality | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Guest Experience
|
|
|
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Housekeeping
|
|
|
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Payments
|
|
|
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Reservations Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Revenue Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes & Compliance
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Support & Training
|
|
|
| Online 24/7 support | ||
|
▾
Food & Beverage
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module |
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has changed how we think about growth. For the first time, we could see exactly which districts were most profitable and where we should be focusing our energy — and our invest..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
What hoteliers love
Reviewers consistently say Preno is easy for hotel teams to learn and operate, which reduces training time and day-to-day friction. This ease of use h... Reviewers consistently say Preno is easy for hotel teams to learn and operate, which reduces training time and day-to-day friction. This ease of use helps staff move faster across reservation, housekeeping, and billing tasks, supporting smoother operations with less manual effort.
Users highlight housekeeping as a strong operational fit, especially the ability to assign tasks and manage room-related workflows efficiently. Review... Users highlight housekeeping as a strong operational fit, especially the ability to assign tasks and manage room-related workflows efficiently. Reviewers say these functions are well designed and save time, helping hotels coordinate rooms more effectively and keep turnover moving.
Several reviews mention bills from different departments and the quality of reports for the finance team. This suggests Preno helps hotels consolidate... Several reviews mention bills from different departments and the quality of reports for the finance team. This suggests Preno helps hotels consolidate charges and improve financial visibility, reducing admin work and supporting better revenue tracking.
Where hoteliers push back
A reviewer notes that Preno could offer more payment options, such as handling early non-refundable payment differently from flexible pre-arrival paym... A reviewer notes that Preno could offer more payment options, such as handling early non-refundable payment differently from flexible pre-arrival payment. This points to a revenue and policy gap for hotels that need more nuanced payment rules to protect income and match booking conditions.
One review explicitly asks for paperless check-in support, showing this is a missing workflow for properties aiming to speed arrivals and reduce front... One review explicitly asks for paperless check-in support, showing this is a missing workflow for properties aiming to speed arrivals and reduce front-desk paperwork. Adding it could improve guest convenience and streamline check-in operations.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Reviewers consistently praise RMS support for being fast, knowledgeable, and proactive when issues arise. Many say the team helps them resolve problem... Reviewers consistently praise RMS support for being fast, knowledgeable, and proactive when issues arise. Many say the team helps them resolve problems quickly and keeps them informed, which reduces downtime and makes the platform easier to adopt and operate.
Users repeatedly say RMS is straightforward to learn and navigate, which helps staff work faster and with fewer mistakes. Hotels appreciate that the s... Users repeatedly say RMS is straightforward to learn and navigate, which helps staff work faster and with fewer mistakes. Hotels appreciate that the system centralizes daily tasks and makes property operations smoother, especially for teams that want an all-in-one platform without added complexity.
Users frequently mention RMS’s reporting depth, saying it helps them monitor revenue, operations, and property performance. At the same time, several... Users frequently mention RMS’s reporting depth, saying it helps them monitor revenue, operations, and property performance. At the same time, several reviews ask for easier customization, more filters, and less technical report creation so teams can build exactly the reports they need without recreating them from scratch.
Where hoteliers push back
Many reviewers highlight RMS for simplifying invoicing, account management, direct debit, statements, and bill-to-room workflows. It is especially val... Many reviewers highlight RMS for simplifying invoicing, account management, direct debit, statements, and bill-to-room workflows. It is especially valued in more complex billing environments, though some users want more flexibility around invoices, AR routing, receipts, and handling split charges or long-stay accounts.
A smaller set of reviews call out the need for tighter integration with POS systems and better tracking of guest activities. These users want RMS to c... A smaller set of reviews call out the need for tighter integration with POS systems and better tracking of guest activities. These users want RMS to connect more deeply with on-property spend and experience management so the PMS can support more complete guest billing and service coordination.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Preno and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Preno offers 17 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 118. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Preno: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Preno has an HT Score of 83 and RMS has 89. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property