The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
SS&C shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 160 | 0 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, Preno users most value its user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management, while SS&C users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #13 80 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #32 15 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #46 1 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #39 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #14 65 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 53 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #21 17 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #8 26 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #27 7 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #25 13 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #20 3 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #13 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Preno by Preno and TimeShareWare by SS&C hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but Preno is tailored for smaller to mid-sized hotels, particularly boutique and motels, while TimeShareWare targets multi-site resorts and timeshare operators. Your decision should be guided by the size of your property, the features you require, and how each system integrates into your current workflow.
Preno excels in user-friendliness and recent positive reviews, whereas SS&C’s offering is less visible in recent customer feedback. Given the review count and the recency of feedback, Preno’s user satisfaction metrics are notably stronger. Do you prioritize a system with proven, recent hotelier approval, or are you looking for a solution with deep industry specialization in larger scale property management?
Preno and TimeShareWare both serve property management needs but are optimized for different segments. Preno is a cloud-based PMS designed by hoteliers for hoteliers, focusing on simplicity, guest communication, and operational efficiency for boutique hotels, motels, and small chains. In contrast, TimeShareWare is a comprehensive resort management platform built for multi-site timeshare and vacation ownership operations, emphasizing asset management and complex owner services.
Preno’s 144 recent reviews with a high 4.73/5 rating and a NPS score of 9.53/10 position it as a trusted solution among hoteliers. TimeShareWare, with no recent reviews, appears less tested in current hotel industry contexts. Given recent feedback, Preno is more trusted for daily hotel operations, while TimeShareWare seems geared toward large-scale resort and timeshare management.
Are you seeking a straightforward property management system or a complex resort management platform? If your hotel operates primarily as a boutique or motel, Preno’s recent acceptance suggests a better fit. For multi-site resorts with fractional ownership, the lack of recent reviews for TimeShareWare makes its suitability less clear.
If your hotel is a boutique, motel, or small chain seeking an easy-to-use PMS with strong integration capabilities, Preno is your clear choice. Its extensive feature set (30 unique features), high user ratings, and recent positive reviews demonstrate its effectiveness for smaller properties. It’s especially suitable if you want built-in channel management, guest CRM, automated night audits, and mobile access.
Conversely, if your hotel operates multiple high-end resorts, vacation clubs, or fractional properties, TimeShareWare offers specialized tools for managing complex owner relationships, multi-site operations, and asset valuation. However, the lack of recent reviews or detailed user feedback limits confidence in its current effectiveness for typical hoteliers.
Choose Preno if your focus is daily operational efficiency and guest experience. Pick TimeShareWare only if your property management needs extend into multi-site, fractional ownership, or timeshare-specific processes, and you're prepared for less recent validation.
Preno is highly rated for ease of use, earning a 4.78/5 based on recent reviews from 144 hotelier users, and a customer support score of 4.8/5. Many hoteliers describe its interface as intuitive, with straightforward onboarding and quick staff adoption. Users appreciate how its clean layout simplifies daily tasks like check-ins, billing, and reporting.
TimeShareWare, lacking recent reviews and detailed feedback, leaves its ease of use unverified in current hotel contexts. Its complexity likely targets larger, multi-site operations with specialized needs, which may entail a steeper learning curve.
Edge: Preno.
Preno boasts an extensive feature package tailored for hotel operations, including payment processing, calendar views, custom rates, direct billing, online support, guest profiles, CRM, revenue and ADR reports, housekeeping modules, automated night audits, and a booking engine. It also offers native email marketing, EPoS, channel management, and real-time reporting.
TimeShareWare provides core property management and accounting for timeshare and resort businesses, with features like lease management, owner services, sales automation, and multi-site oversight. However, it appears to lack the breadth of standalone features seen in Preno, especially those tailored for guest experience and revenue optimization.
Edge: Preno.
Preno is consistently praised for its support, receiving a 4.8/5 rating, with reviews highlighting fast, friendly, and helpful service. Users value the direct communication, ease of onboarding, and ongoing assistance, often noting Preno’s responsiveness during critical setup phases.
With no recent feedback or reviews available for TimeShareWare, its support quality remains unverified for the current hotel industry. Given the importance of support during daily operations, Preno's recent high scores make it the safer choice.
Edge: Preno.
Preno offers integrations with 17 verified partners, including Xero, SiteMinder, RevControl, TrustYou, and HelloShift. These integrations facilitate seamless accounting, channel management, guest feedback, and operational automation. Its integration ecosystem is robust and actively maintained.
TimeShareWare has only one verified integration, with limited detail available, suggesting less flexibility and connectivity for hotel-specific tools. For hotels relying on diverse software integrations, Preno’s stronger partner network is advantageous.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s recent reviews and high ratings (4.73/5 overall, 4.78/5 ease of use, 4.8/5 support) reflect strong hotelier satisfaction, especially among boutique and motel properties. The 144 reviews, with recent activity, reinforce its trusted status.
TimeShareWare, lacking recent review data, provides no current rating insights. Its absence from recent hotel feedback suggests it is less favored or less actively used in the hotel industry today.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s pricing is transparent at $800 per month, with no free tier, implementation fees, or flexible subscription options. Costs are straightforward, targeting small to mid-sized hotels with clear budgeting expectations.
TimeShareWare’s pricing details are not publicly available, making direct comparison difficult. Given the lack of transparent pricing and recent reviews, Preno’s predictable cost structure offers a clearer value proposition.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Preno and TimeShareWare serve very different hotel management niches. Preno is a straightforward, highly-rated solution for smaller hotels, motels, and boutique properties seeking efficiency and strong support. TimeShareWare specializes in multi-site, timeshare, and resort operations, offering tailored features for complex asset and owner management, but it lacks recent validation from hotel users.
If your hotel seeks a system proven by recent reviews, with high satisfaction scores and extensive integrations, Preno is the clear choice. For large resorts, vacation clubs, or fractional ownership businesses, TimeShareWare may be appropriate, but caution is warranted due to the absence of recent customer feedback.
Choose Preno for simplicity, reliability, and proven hotel industry acceptance. Opt for TimeShareWare only if your operations are highly specialized and you’ve verified that its features meet your complex needs.
According to HTR's product database, Preno and TimeShareWare share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Preno and TimeShareWare share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Preno offers 17 verified integration partners, while TimeShareWare offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Preno: No. TimeShareWare: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Preno has an HT Score of 80 and SS&C has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor