The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
CMSol shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 160 | 0 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, Preno users most value its user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management, while CMSol users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #13 80 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #32 15 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #46 1 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #39 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #14 65 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 53 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #21 17 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #8 26 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #27 7 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #25 13 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #20 3 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #13 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Preno by Preno and Visual Hotel by CMSol hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but Preno's extensive feature set and proven track record make it a more comprehensive solution for most hoteliers. Visual Hotel emphasizes AI-driven insights and guest feedback management, but its limited review data and regional presence weaken its overall case. Which platform will better serve your property’s unique demands?
Preno and Visual Hotel both target hotel management, but they diverge significantly in scope and maturity. Preno, established in 2015, offers a feature-rich PMS with integrations, automation, and a global presence, backed by over 140 reviews and recent positive feedback. Visual Hotel, founded in 2022, is newer, with no reviews or ratings available, and a focus on AI-driven insights rather than full PMS functionality. Are you prioritizing tried-and-true features or experimental AI tools?
If your hotel needs a full-featured property management system that handles bookings, billing, channel management, and reporting—especially across multiple properties—Preno should be your pick. Its proven reliability and extensive integrations suit hotels ranging from boutique to motels and large resorts. Conversely, if your team is seeking advanced guest feedback analysis and sentiment insights, and regional presence isn’t a concern, Visual Hotel’s AI capabilities could appeal. However, given its lack of reviews and global reach, Preno remains the safer, more tested choice.
Preno is highly rated for usability, with a 4.78/5 ease of use score and positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users describe it as “a motelier's dream” and emphasize its simple layout and helpful support team. Visual Hotel, with no available user ratings, remains untested in terms of usability by the broader hotel community. Edge: Preno.
Preno boasts 30 unique features, including payment processing, a calendar view, online support, guest CRM, revenue management, mobile app, booking engine, channel manager, and automated night audit—covering all core PMS needs. Visual Hotel’s features focus on AI insights and guest sentiment analysis, with no detailed feature count provided. It does not currently offer the comprehensive operational tools Preno does. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s 4.8/5 support rating is backed by reviewer comments praising its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially during onboarding. Users note, “The Preno support team took me through whatever I couldn’t work out,” and appreciate quick responses. Visual Hotel, lacking review data or support ratings, cannot be confidently compared. Based on available evidence, Preno leads here. Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including major tools like Xero, SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate, enabling smooth automation across operations. Visual Hotel has no listed integrations, limiting its connectivity. If integrations with industry-standard tools are vital, Preno clearly offers more. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s overall rating of 4.73/5, based on 144 reviews—most recent within 6 months—signifies strong user satisfaction. Hoteliers praise its simplicity, support, and integration capabilities, with a 95% likelihood to recommend. Visual Hotel has no reviews or ratings available, so its reputation remains unverified. For proven satisfaction, Preno outperforms. Edge: Preno.
Preno lists a base price of $800 per month, with no free tier or trial info available. Pricing details for Visual Hotel are not provided, making direct comparison difficult. Given Preno’s transparent pricing, you can budget accordingly. The lack of pricing info for Visual Hotel complicates its evaluation.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Preno is an established, comprehensive PMS solution relied upon by a diverse range of properties. Its robust feature set, frequent updates, and extensive integrations make it suitable for hoteliers who want a reliable system that covers all operational bases. Visual Hotel, while promising AI insights, is new, with no reviews to validate its effectiveness or support structure.
If you need a dependable, full-featured PMS with proven support, Preno is the best choice. Its recent reviews and high ratings confirm its suitability for hotels seeking operational efficiency. Visual Hotel may appeal if your focus is on guest feedback insights and AI-driven recommendations, but its limited user data makes it a riskier option at this stage.
In summary, for most hotels, Preno offers a more mature and comprehensive platform, ensuring your team can manage your property confidently and efficiently.
According to HTR's product database, Preno and Visual Hotel share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Preno and Visual Hotel share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Preno offers 17 verified integration partners, while Visual Hotel offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Preno: No. Visual Hotel: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Preno has an HT Score of 80 and CMSol has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor