The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Winner Hotel Software shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 160 | 0 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, Preno users most value its user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management, while Winner Hotel Software users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #13 80 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #32 15 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #46 1 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #39 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #14 65 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 53 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #21 17 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #8 26 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #27 7 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #25 13 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #20 3 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #13 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Preno by Preno and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but Preno’s larger user base and recent reviews suggest it is currently more aligned with hoteliers seeking a reliable, feature-rich PMS. While Winner PMS boasts a robust suite of functions, its limited review activity and regional reach make it a less proven option at this time.
Preno excels at providing an intuitive, cloud-based platform that simplifies daily operations across diverse property types. Winner PMS, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive solution with a focus on centralizing workflow but lacks recent, extensive customer feedback to validate its performance. Is your team ready for a mature, well-supported PMS or open to trying a newer, rapidly adopted platform?
Preno and Winner PMS both aim to enhance hotel efficiency, but their approach and maturity differ. Preno has a 4.73/5 overall rating backed by 144 reviews and a recent review count of 1 in the last six months, indicating active, ongoing user engagement. Meanwhile, Winner PMS’s review count and recent feedback are unavailable, and its overall rating is not provided, making it harder to assess current user satisfaction.
Preno’s reviews highlight ease of use, strong customer support, and a broad feature set that addresses operational needs from reservations to guest communication. Winner PMS’s reviews are sparse, and its regional presence is limited mainly to North America and parts of Europe, contrasting with Preno’s global reach across 23 countries.
Are you comfortable selecting a platform with a proven track record and active user feedback? Or are you willing to explore a less established system that might still be refining its features?
If your hotel needs a well-rounded, user-friendly PMS with a proven track record and extensive integrations, Preno is the logical choice. Its features—payment processing, a booking engine, channel management, and guest CRM—are supported by high satisfaction ratings and a large, recent review base, making it ideal for small to medium hotels, boutique properties, and motels.
On the other hand, if your hotel operates on a larger scale or requires advanced centralized functions with a focus on workflow automation, Winner PMS might appeal. However, its lack of recent reviews and regional limitations suggest it’s better suited for hotels already familiar with its interface or in markets where its support is more established.
For most hoteliers prioritizing stability, support, and proven functionality, Preno is the safer choice. If your hotel is looking to experiment with a newer platform that might evolve rapidly, Winner PMS warrants consideration.
Preno’s ease of use is reflected in its 4.78/5 UI rating, supported by reviews that praise its clean, intuitive interface and simple navigation. Its onboarding process, rated 4.68/5, is described by users as straightforward, with responsive support helping to minimize learning curves.
Winner PMS’s interface and onboarding experience are not detailed in recent reviews, and its overall support ratings are unavailable, suggesting less current feedback. Given Preno’s high user ratings and active review activity, it clearly offers a more accessible experience for staff at all technical levels.
Edge: Preno.
Preno offers 30 features exclusive to its platform, including payment processing, a calendar view, custom rates, direct billing, integrated CRM, housekeeping modules, automation tools like night audits, revenue management, and a native booking engine. Its integrations with tools like Xero, SiteMinder, and RevControl further extend its capabilities.
Winner PMS’s feature set is not explicitly detailed, but it focuses on core hotel operations—reservations, check-ins, billing, and housekeeping. Its limited feature disclosure and lack of recent reviews make it difficult to compare directly, but Preno’s broader and more detailed feature list suggests it provides more comprehensive support for daily operations.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s support ratings are outstanding at 4.8/5, with reviews emphasizing fast, friendly, and helpful service. Users appreciate the proactive communication and the support team’s responsiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
In contrast, Winner PMS’s support ratings are not publicly detailed or recent, leaving uncertainty about its service quality. Given the high support satisfaction with Preno, it remains the more dependable choice for hotels prioritizing responsive assistance.
Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including Xero, Bookboost, RevControl, GuestTraction, Zingle, TrustYou, STAAH, SiteMinder, and Revinate. These integrations facilitate smooth accounting, distribution, guest engagement, and reputation management.
Winner PMS’s only listed verified partner is Mews, with no other integrations specified. This limited ecosystem suggests Preno’s broader compatibility with third-party tools gives it an edge for hotels seeking flexible, connected management.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s customer ratings are high across the board: 4.73/5 overall, 4.78/5 for ease of use, 4.8/5 for support, and a 9.53/5 NPS score, with 144 reviews. Recent reviews confirm ongoing satisfaction, especially from boutique hotels and motels, which praise its simplicity and support.
Winner PMS’s review activity is not recent or extensive, making it difficult to assess current user sentiment. With clear, positive feedback and more reviews, Preno is clearly favored by hoteliers.
Edge: Preno.
Preno’s pricing is listed at a base of $800, with no freemium or flexible monthly plans, which might be a consideration for smaller hotels. Details for Winner PMS’s pricing are not publicly available, making direct comparison difficult.
Given Preno’s transparent pricing, hotels can evaluate whether its investment aligns with their operational scale. The lack of specific pricing info for Winner PMS suggests it may have bespoke or variable costs.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Preno and Winner PMS both aim to improve hotel operations, but Preno’s more extensive, recent reviews and broader feature set make it the clearer choice for most hoteliers. Preno’s high ratings across satisfaction, ease of use, and support demonstrate its stability and maturity, especially for boutique hotels and motels.
Winner PMS might be suitable for larger properties or hotels already invested in its ecosystem, but the lack of current reviews and regional coverage limits confidence. For hotels seeking a proven, well-supported PMS, Preno currently stands out as the more reliable solution.
If your hotel values a system with active user feedback, extensive integrations, and a straightforward interface, Preno is the recommended platform. For those with specific needs aligned with Winner PMS’s offerings and in regions where it’s supported, it could still be a viable option—but caution is advised given the limited recent data.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Preno and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Preno and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Preno offers 17 verified integration partners, while Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Preno: No. Winner PMS (acquired by Mews): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Preno has an HT Score of 80 and Winner Hotel Software has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor