The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
PXP shines , with exclusive features like Contactless Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting.
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, PXP users most value its , while ROH users highlight automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 21 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 28 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 61 reviews |
| Europe | — | #3 1 reviews |
When choosing a payments processing system for your hotel, you want a solution that is reliable, easy to use, and offers strong support. PXP by PXP and ROH by ROH both aim to streamline your financial transactions, but they diverge significantly in features, customer feedback, and market presence. PXP has little recent review activity and a zero-star rating, while ROH boasts a high rating based on dozens of recent reviews. Does that make ROH the more trustworthy option for your property?
Both products address payment management, but ROH emphasizes automation, guest payment efficiency, and real-time reporting, whereas PXP touts broad payment type support and multiple currencies. Given the stark difference in customer feedback, how should your team evaluate the true value each platform offers?
PXP aims to provide a unified platform supporting diverse payment methods, including multi-currency settlements, PayPal, and contactless payments. However, its review score of 0 and lack of recent reviews cast doubt on its current reliability and customer satisfaction.
ROH, on the other hand, has a 100/100 HTR Score, a 4.97/5 customer support rating, and 65 reviews, with 10 submitted in the last six months. Hotel staff praise ROH for its ease of use, automation features, and real-time reporting, which help streamline guest payments and improve cash flow.
While PXP offers more features—such as Klarna installment plans and Vantiv processing—its absence of recent validation makes it risky. ROH's proven track record and positive recent feedback make it the safer, more practical choice for hotel operators seeking dependable payment automation.
If your hotel needs a wide array of payment options, especially multi-currency and digital wallets, PXP’s extensive feature list makes it appealing. Its support for PayPal, contactless, and secure 3-D payments could benefit global or tech-forward properties.
However, if your priority is straightforward, reliable payment automation with high user satisfaction, ROH should be your pick. Its strong focus on invoice scheduling, automated processing, and real-time reporting aligns better with daily hotel operations, especially if minimizing manual effort and maximizing cash flow are goals.
For hotels that prefer an established, well-reviewed platform with proven support and recent customer validation, ROH’s high ratings and recent reviews tip the scale. PXP’s broader feature set might be attractive for complex, multi-currency needs, but its unverified current performance makes ROH the more dependable choice today.
ROH’s ease of use is one of its standout features, with a 4.95/5 rating and recent reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward payment workflows. Reviewers consistently mention how staff find it simple to adopt, with minimal training needed, and appreciate the automated invoicing and notification features.
In contrast, PXP’s usability data is nonexistent, and with a zero-star overall rating, confidence in its user experience is very low. Its lack of recent reviews suggests it might not be actively supported or adopted by hotels currently.
Edge: ROH.
PXP offers 11 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, and Klarna installment plans, supporting a broad range of payment types. It also supports advanced security measures like 3-D Secure and accepts PayPal, making it suitable for international and tech-savvy properties.
ROH provides five exclusive features, notably payment splitting and installment plans, along with widespread acceptance of Discover, Mastercard, and Diner’s Club cards. While its feature set is narrower, it covers core automation and scheduling tools that directly improve operational efficiency.
Given the total feature counts—14 shared features—PXP’s broader functionality might appeal to large, complex properties, but ROH’s focused automation features are more proven for daily hotel management. Edge: PXP.
ROH’s customer support is rated at 4.97/5, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Hotel staff highlight the platform’s support team as a significant advantage, especially during initial setup and troubleshooting.
PXP’s support rating is unknown, and its lack of recent reviews indicates it may no longer be actively supported or trusted by users. Without verified support quality, relying on PXP could expose your team to unresolved issues.
Edge: ROH.
PXP integrates with seven verified partners, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality and several others such as Profitroom, Maestro PMS, and Canary Technologies. This broad integration capability helps connect PXP with various PMS, CRM, and booking platforms.
ROH’s single verified integration is with Oracle Hospitality, limiting its immediate ecosystem connectivity. However, its high customer satisfaction suggests that its core features are well-optimized, though expansion could improve.
Edge: PXP.
ROH’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 9.91/10 NPS score and a 100/100 HTR Score. Hoteliers across segments—including luxury, boutique, and resorts—consistently praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
PXP has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction or performance. The lack of recent feedback significantly diminishes confidence in its current effectiveness.
Edge: ROH.
Both products are priced at a $100 base fee, with no mention of additional costs like implementation fees, monthly per-room charges, or freemium plans. Pricing appears straightforward, but the absence of detailed breakdowns leaves room for questions about total cost.
Given similar base prices, the decision hinges on value and support quality rather than price. ROH’s proven performance and extensive recent reviews provide a clearer picture of value for your investment.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ROH excels as a payment automation platform, with a proven track record and high customer satisfaction. Its focus on invoice management, real-time reporting, and user-friendly design makes it suitable for hotels aiming to streamline financial operations.
PXP offers a broader set of payment features, including multi-currency and diverse payment types, but its current lack of recent reviews and support validation renders it a risky choice for most hotels today.
If your hotel values reliable, easy-to-use automation, choose ROH. For properties with complex international payment needs and willingness to explore less proven options, PXP might be worth considering, but only with caution.
According to HTR's product database, PXP and ROH share 14 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Accepts Diners Club | ||
| Accepts Discovery | ||
| Accepts Mastercard | ||
| Accepts Paypal | ||
| Contactless Payments | ||
| Dynamic Currency Conversion (DCC) | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Installment Plans | ||
| Klarna Installment Plans | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Payment Splitting |
Showing top differences. 4 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. PXP and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. PXP offers 7 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
PXP: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. PXP has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor