The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 172 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Exely shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Post-stay emails.
rajakamar shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 172 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 172 | 0 |
After analyzing 172 verified reviews, Exely users most value its support and responsiveness, booking engine effectiveness, direct booking enhancement, while rajakamar users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support and Responsiveness
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine Effectiveness
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct Booking Enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Manager Synchronization
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and Advanced Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Guest Experience Concerns
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #15 34 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #11 64 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #22 5 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #8 6 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 35 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #15 28 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #16 17 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #16 9 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| North America | #24 2 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #25 11 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #4 79 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 17 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is critical for your hotel’s success, especially as direct bookings become increasingly vital. Both Exely Booking Engine and rajakamar aim to improve your booking process, but they diverge significantly in features, reputation, and market presence. With Exely’s extensive reviews and recent user feedback, it’s clear which product currently offers more value and reliability for hoteliers.
Are you looking for a proven, well-supported booking engine with a broad feature set? Or do you prefer a less established system with minimal reviews? Let’s examine how they stack up.
Exely Booking Engine stands out as the more established and reviewed product, boasting 144 reviews, a high rating of 92.67 on the HT Score, and a 98% likelihood to recommend. Its recent reviews show consistent praise for ease of use, support, and features, making it a trusted choice for hoteliers aiming to boost direct bookings.
In contrast, rajakamar has no reviews, ratings, or recent user feedback available. Its market presence appears minimal, and the platform’s capabilities and customer satisfaction are unverified. So, if you value active user insights and a proven track record, Exely is the clear leader.
Will you prioritize a platform with verified user success or one with untested potential?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, reliable booking engine with proven customer support, go with Exely. It’s suited for independent hotels, boutique properties, and larger chains seeking a feature-rich system with extensive integrations, regional coverage, and ongoing user validation.
If your hotel is comfortable experimenting with a less documented system and doesn’t prioritize proven support or features, you might consider rajakamar. However, the absence of reviews or case studies makes it difficult to assess its suitability or performance.
Ultimately, for most hoteliers, Exely offers a safer, more data-backed choice.
Exely scores 4.91 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its user-friendly dashboard and smooth management of rates, availability, and reservations. The onboarding process is rated at 4.84 out of 5, and customer support is similarly high at 4.96, indicating strong post-sale assistance.
rajakamar provides no ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge its usability. Its lack of documented user experience suggests it may not match Exely’s ease of adoption.
Edge: Exely Booking Engine.
Exely offers 29 distinct features, including mobile responsiveness, multi-room bookings, multi-lingual interfaces, conversion reports, flexible rates, booking abandonment capture, and integrations with platforms like Booking.com, TripAdvisor, PayPal, and Stripe. These features are designed to enhance guest experience and operational efficiency.
rajakamar has no publicly listed or verified features, leaving its capabilities uncertain. Given Exely’s extensive feature set and proven integrations, it provides a clear advantage.
Edge: Exely Booking Engine.
Exely’s customer support boasts a 4.96/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing prompt responses and helpful, friendly service. Support staff are noted for solving issues quickly, which is vital when implementing a booking engine.
There are no reviews or support ratings available for rajakamar. Its support quality remains unverified, and without user feedback, it’s unlikely to match Exely’s high standards.
Edge: Exely Booking Engine.
Exely integrates with eight verified partners, including major industry players like Hotellab, Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Booking.com. These integrations facilitate smooth operations, channel management, and marketing efforts.
rajakamar has no listed or verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems and platforms. This significantly constrains its flexibility and scalability.
Edge: Exely Booking Engine.
Exely’s reviews, though limited to 144, are recent and overwhelmingly positive, with a 98% recommendation rate. Its users span luxury, boutique, city center, resort, and extended-stay hotels, many of which praise its simplicity, support, and effectiveness.
rajakamar has no reviews, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction or compare hotel segment ratings.
Edge: Exely Booking Engine.
Exely’s pricing starts at $200 per month, with no free tier or trial, representing a straightforward subscription model. Its pricing aligns with its extensive features and support services.
rajakamar does not publicly disclose pricing or trial options, which raises questions about its market positioning and value proposition.
Given the available info, Exely’s transparent pricing offers better clarity.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
The core difference is that Exely is an established, well-reviewed booking engine with a broad feature set, strong support, and proven integrations, making it a dependable choice for most hoteliers. Rajakamar, lacking reviews, features, and market presence, remains an untested option without verified customer satisfaction or support.
If you seek a reliable, extensively supported platform that has demonstrated success across multiple regions and property types, Exely is the clear choice. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and active user base make it a safe investment.
Choose Exely if your priority is proven performance, extensive features, and support. Opt for rajakamar only if you're comfortable with high uncertainty and are prepared to trial a less established system without the reassurance of existing customer feedback.
According to HTR's product database, Exely Booking Engine and rajakamar share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
rajakamar |
|---|---|---|
| Conversion rate reports | ||
| Flexible dates | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Room substitutions |
Showing top differences. 17 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Exely's support is lauded for its rapid response times and solution-oriented approach, contributing to an improved user experience. This is seen as a... Exely's support is lauded for its rapid response times and solution-oriented approach, contributing to an improved user experience. This is seen as a considerable strength of the product.
Exely's booking engine is frequently praised for its user-friendliness, fast operation, and ability to enhance direct bookings significantly, thus con... Exely's booking engine is frequently praised for its user-friendliness, fast operation, and ability to enhance direct bookings significantly, thus contributing to revenue growth. It is deemed to have a powerful positive impact on the guest experience and conversion rates.
The software is commended for increasing direct bookings and lowering reliance on OTAs. This positively impacts hotel revenue by lowering third-party... The software is commended for increasing direct bookings and lowering reliance on OTAs. This positively impacts hotel revenue by lowering third-party fees and providing a return on investment through efficient booking management.
Where hoteliers push back
A recurring critical point among users is the limited customization options available, particularly in reporting and website design. Users seek more f... A recurring critical point among users is the limited customization options available, particularly in reporting and website design. Users seek more flexibility to adapt templates and reports to their needs.
Users would like to see improvements in integration capabilities with other hotel management systems. Current integration limitations are seen as a do... Users would like to see improvements in integration capabilities with other hotel management systems. Current integration limitations are seen as a downside restricting the platform's full potential.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Exely Booking Engine and rajakamar share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Exely Booking Engine offers 8 verified integration partners, while rajakamar offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Exely Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Exely Booking Engine: No. rajakamar: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Exely has an HT Score of 93 and rajakamar has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor