The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,364 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eRevMax shines , with exclusive features like A/B testing & optimization and Alternative accommodation recommendations (when no availability).
SiteMinder shines in ease of use — especially for brand properties (4.3/5) , with exclusive features like Performance Reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,364 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 20 | 1,344 |
After analyzing 1,364 verified reviews, eRevMax users most value its , while SiteMinder users highlight channel manager, integration with otas, user-friendly dashboard. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Channel Manager
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with OTAs
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly Dashboard
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Inventory Updates
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine Functionality
▾
|
|
|
−
Responsive Support Team
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #34 4 reviews | #1 470 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #30 10 reviews | #1 527 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #25 2 reviews | #1 96 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #19 2 reviews | #1 50 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #31 11 reviews | #1 564 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #27 11 reviews | #1 411 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #33 3 reviews | #1 230 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #29 3 reviews | #1 174 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #28 1 reviews | #2 157 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #42 0 reviews | #5 266 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #19 4 reviews | #1 418 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #4 10 reviews | #3 13 reviews |
Choosing a booking engine is crucial for your hotel's distribution and revenue strategies. RateTiger Booking Engine by eRevMax and SiteMinder Booking Engine both aim to streamline bookings and maximize occupancy, but they do so with different strengths. Your decision hinges on your property size, regional focus, and specific operational needs.
RateTiger is known for its pace of innovation and specialized features tailored to certain markets, while SiteMinder dominates with its extensive partner network and proven global presence. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
RateTiger and SiteMinder both serve as core tools for online distribution, but they differ significantly in market reach and feature depth. RateTiger offers a straightforward booking engine that emphasizes real-time rate and availability updates, with a focus on ancillary revenue management and multi-language support.
SiteMinder, on the other hand, provides an expansive network of integrations with over 245 verified partners, including PMS systems, OTAs, and metasearch engines. It also offers a more comprehensive suite of features like detailed performance reporting and multi-currency support.
While RateTiger’s interface is praised for its simplicity and responsiveness, SiteMinder’s platform is noted for its scalability and extensive connectivity. If you require broad distribution and a proven global network, SiteMinder is more established; if your hotel benefits from specialized features and ease of operation, RateTiger is worth considering.
Given the vast difference in their market presence and recent user feedback, SiteMinder's larger review base and more recent reviews make it the clearer choice. Are you ready to leverage a platform with proven global reach?
If your hotel is a large property, chain, or operates in multiple regions, SiteMinder’s extensive partner ecosystem and robust global coverage make it the superior choice. Its ability to connect with over 245 verified partners and offer solutions like performance analytics and multi-lingual support caters to complex, multi-property operations.
Conversely, if your hotel is boutique, regional, or seeks a streamlined booking experience with balanced features, RateTiger’s simpler interface and ancillary options might be more suitable. Its core strength lies in effective rate and inventory synchronization, especially for properties prioritizing direct website conversions.
The decision largely depends on your property’s scale and strategic focus. If you need a platform with proven scalability and extensive integrations, SiteMinder’s larger and more recent review base supports its leadership. For niche or regional properties, RateTiger’s targeted approach could suffice.
Edge: SiteMinder.
User reviews consistently rate SiteMinder higher for ease of use, with a 4.6/5 score versus RateTiger’s 4.29/5. SiteMinder’s interface is praised for its intuitive design and quick onboarding, reflected in recent reviews where users mention how easily staff adapt to its workflow.
RateTiger, while also rated favorably at 4.29/5, receives some feedback indicating a slight learning curve, especially when managing complex rates or integrations. Its platform is straightforward but less modern in appearance, which can affect staff adoption.
Given that recent reviews favor SiteMinder’s UI and support, the edge clearly goes to SiteMinder for user experience, especially for hotels seeking quick staff onboarding and minimal training.
Edge: SiteMinder.
RateTiger offers unique features like A/B testing & optimization, room substitutions, and alternative accommodation recommendations, totaling 3 features exclusive to it. It also supports ancillary revenue options such as add-ons for spa or parking services.
SiteMinder outperforms with 19 exclusive features, including performance reporting, rate intelligence, open API, PMS connectivity, multi-currency support, and inventory management. It also offers advanced analytics, bulk updates, and yield rules, making it a more comprehensive solution for larger operations.
While RateTiger’s niche features are valuable, SiteMinder’s broader feature set and scalability make it the better choice for hotels looking for a full-featured platform that can grow with their needs.
Edge: SiteMinder.
RateTiger’s recent reviews highlight its responsive, knowledgeable support team, with a 4.47/5 rating. Users appreciate the dedicated training and prompt problem resolution, often mentioning how support staff go above and beyond.
SiteMinder’s customer support, rated at 4.43/5, is likewise highly praised for its responsiveness and multilingual assistance. However, some recent reviews mention occasional delays during peak times, suggesting room for faster responses.
Considering the larger volume of recent reviews and the slightly higher recent satisfaction scores, RateTiger’s support is marginally favored. Yet, both platforms demonstrate strong customer service.
Edge: RateTiger.
SiteMinder’s overall rating of 4.48/5 is driven by over 1,200 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability, extensive integrations, and ease of managing multiple properties. Hotel segments like independent, boutique, and resort properties frequently rate it highly for operational efficiency.
RateTiger’s modest review count (17 reviews) and lower overall rating (0/5) make it less reliable as an indicator of user satisfaction. The last six months saw no new reviews, limiting confidence in its current performance.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, SiteMinder’s higher ratings reflect a broader, more satisfied user base. It’s the preferred choice for hotels seeking proven performance.
Edge: SiteMinder.
RateTiger’s pricing details are not publicly available, as it typically involves customized quotes based on hotel size and needs. It does not offer a free trial, which might impact smaller hotels or those testing solutions.
SiteMinder charges a flat monthly fee of $500, with no additional implementation costs. Its transparent pricing and absence of hidden fees make it easier for hotels to budget and plan.
If upfront clarity and predictable costs matter, SiteMinder’s straightforward pricing model offers an advantage. RateTiger’s custom quotes make it harder to compare directly but may suit larger properties with specific requirements.
Not ideal if you require broad global distribution, performance analytics, or multi-property scalability, as RateTiger has fewer integrations and a smaller user base.
Not ideal if your hotel is small or regional, and you prefer a simpler, less costly platform with fewer integrations. Its complexity might also be a challenge for very small teams.
In summary, SiteMinder’s extensive network, feature set, and high recent review volume make it the definitive choice for most hotels pursuing growth and operational efficiency. Its broad connectivity and scalability support a wide range of property types and sizes.
RateTiger excels in niche markets, boutique properties, or hotels seeking straightforward rate and availability management with dedicated support. However, its limited reviews and smaller user base reduce confidence in its current performance.
For properties looking for proven reliability, extensive integrations, and global reach, SiteMinder stands out as the clear winner. Meanwhile, RateTiger remains a solid option for targeted, regional, or smaller-scale hotels with specific needs.
Note: This comparison reflects the latest review data and feature analysis. Always consider your hotel’s unique context before selecting a platform.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Merchandising & Packages
|
|
|
| Room substitutions | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Flat, floating and discounted rates | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Customizable add-ons | ||
| Meal plans | ||
| Website Integration | ||
| Social Media Integration/Bookings | ||
|
▾
Upselling & Cross Selling
|
|
|
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Booking abandonment recapture | ||
| Customizable add-ons | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Meal plans | ||
| Alternative accommodation recommendations (when no availability) | ||
| Loyalty program integration | ||
|
▾
Conversion
|
|
|
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Special offers & discounts | ||
| Urgency messaging | ||
| Booking abandonment recapture | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Price comparison widget | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Conversion rate reports | ||
| Facebook conversion tracking | ||
| Customizable exit intent modals | ||
| Form autofill | ||
| Flexible dates | ||
| Rate plan comparisons | ||
| Google Hotel Ads Bookings | ||
| Tripadvisor Bookings | ||
|
▾
Payments
|
|
|
| Multi-currency | ||
| Apple Pay | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| Paypal | ||
| PCI Compliance | ||
| PayU | ||
| Stripe | ||
|
▾
Transactional Emails
|
|
|
| Booking abandonment recapture | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Confirmation emails | ||
|
▾
Group Bookings
|
|
|
| Wedding & corporate booking modules | ||
| Availability block | ||
|
▾
Reporting & Analytics
|
|
|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Conversion rate reports | ||
| Referral Reporting | ||
| Google Analytics tracking | ||
|
▾
Tax & Compliance
|
|
|
| PCI Compliance | ||
| ADA Compliant | ||
| Tariffs | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| GDPR compliant | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| Unlimited Channels (no additional cost) |
We analyzed 10 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As mentioned by Jacqueline, efficiency is key in the daily runnings of a property. The fast-paced nature of hospitality means that when guests have a problem, it needs to be solved..."
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
"The team understood our needs, and tweaked the interface to optimise performance accordingly."
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
"We are a transformative business in the Southeast Asian market, in that guests can easily book stays of a varied length and be confident in the consistency of their experience. Thi..."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
SiteMinder's Channel Manager is valued for keeping OTAs, GDS, and direct bookings in sync with real-time updates, helping increase bookings and reduce... SiteMinder's Channel Manager is valued for keeping OTAs, GDS, and direct bookings in sync with real-time updates, helping increase bookings and reduce manual errors. It's seen as efficient, contributing to overall operational improvements.
SiteMinder excels in connecting with various OTAs, ensuring accurate synchronization of rates and availability, which minimizes overbookings and saves... SiteMinder excels in connecting with various OTAs, ensuring accurate synchronization of rates and availability, which minimizes overbookings and saves time. Reviewers appreciate its ability to integrate smoothly with multiple platforms, streamlining operations significantly.
The platform's interface is known for being clean and intuitive, allowing easy navigation and efficient management, but there are suggestions for enri... The platform's interface is known for being clean and intuitive, allowing easy navigation and efficient management, but there are suggestions for enriching analytics and enhancing data visualization.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine is generally praised for its ease of use and direct booking capabilities but often criticized for lacking customization options and... The booking engine is generally praised for its ease of use and direct booking capabilities but often criticized for lacking customization options and modern design. Users recommend enhancements to match hotel branding and improve competition with OTAs.
The support team's responsiveness and ability to solve queries quickly are highly valued. However, during peak times, responses can be slow, leaving r... The support team's responsiveness and ability to solve queries quickly are highly valued. However, during peak times, responses can be slow, leaving room for improved efficiency in handling support requests.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) and SiteMinder Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax) offers 70 verified integration partners, while SiteMinder Booking Engine offers 247. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SiteMinder Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RateTiger Booking Engine (by eRevMax): No. SiteMinder Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eRevMax has an HT Score of 0 and SiteMinder has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property