The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 95 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Frontline Performance Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat) and Performance Reporting & Offer Analytics.
Syspay shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 95 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 95 | 0 |
After analyzing 95 verified reviews, Frontline Performance Group users most value its upsell tracking & reporting, ease of use & integration, performance metrics & goal setting, while Syspay users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Upsell Tracking & Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use & Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Performance Metrics & Goal Setting
▾
|
|
|
+
Training & Development
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Manual Data Tracking
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Upselling Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #9 16 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 29 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 19 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #9 19 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 40 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 46 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #13 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 25 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #18 5 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #5 12 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #3 14 reviews | — |
Choosing the right upselling software for your hotel hinges on understanding each product's strengths and how they align with your operational needs. IN-Gauge by Frontline Performance Group and Receptio by Syspay serve the same core purpose—boosting revenue through upselling and guest engagement—but they diverge significantly in features, support, and market presence. Your decision should consider which platform offers the tools, support, and integration capabilities that best fit your hotel's size, segment, and strategic goals.
IN-Gauge is a comprehensive solution with a proven track record, supported by a large number of recent reviews, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers. Receptio, while promising automation capabilities, currently lacks review data and broader market adoption, limiting its credibility for now.
Both IN-Gauge and Receptio aim to increase revenue through upselling and operational automation, but they approach this goal differently. IN-Gauge provides detailed analytics, targeted offer tools, and multi-channel delivery, making it suitable for hotels seeking granular performance insights and advanced upselling features. Receptio emphasizes automation at the front desk, streamlining manual tasks but lacks the extensive feature set of IN-Gauge.
IN-Gauge's strong customer support (rated 4.9/5) and active community of users contribute to its reliability, whereas Receptio's absence of recent reviews or user feedback makes it harder to assess its effectiveness. Do you value a mature, well-supported platform, or are you exploring automation for simple guest interactions?
If your hotel needs robust performance tracking, extensive upsell features, and multi-channel marketing, IN-Gauge is the better fit. Its 92 reviews, with 21 in the last six months, and a 97% likelihood to recommend, showcase a satisfied customer base across global markets. Receptio’s lack of user feedback and limited regional presence make it less compelling for hotels prioritizing proven performance.
For hotels aiming to motivate staff, analyze detailed revenue data, and implement targeted upselling campaigns, IN-Gauge’s suite of 17 exclusive features and integrations make it the clear choice. Receptio might appeal to hotels seeking simple automation, but its unproven track record suggests caution.
IN-Gauge’s user interface is rated 4.76/5, praised for its intuitive design and ease of onboarding, with many users highlighting its straightforward setup and effective training modules. Its onboarding process, rated 4.78/5, features personalized support and comprehensive tutorials that help staff adopt the system quickly.
Receptio offers automation but lacks detailed user experience data, reviews, or ratings. Its minimal information and absence of user feedback make it difficult to evaluate its ease of use. Based on available data, edge: IN-Gauge.
IN-Gauge boasts 17 exclusive features, including room upgrade merchandising, multi-channel delivery (email, SMS, WhatsApp, chat), offer templates, A/B testing, inventory controls, and guest segmentation. These tools empower your team to tailor upsell offers and analyze performance deeply.
Receptio does not publicly specify feature counts or capabilities, focusing primarily on automation and guest review analysis. Its limited feature disclosure and lack of detailed functionality make IN-Gauge the superior choice for feature-rich, targeted upselling. Edge: IN-Gauge.
IN-Gauge’s support team receives a stellar 4.9/5 rating, with reviews praising their responsiveness, personalized guidance, and ongoing help. Customers describe their support as "warm," "helpful," and integral to their success, especially during onboarding and training.
Receptio offers no publicly available reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Without user feedback, the safe choice is IN-Gauge, which clearly leads in customer satisfaction. Edge: IN-Gauge.
IN-Gauge integrates with three verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Shiji Group, and Stayntouch, allowing it to fit into most hotel tech stacks with relative ease. These integrations support seamless data flow, reducing manual work and improving accuracy.
Receptio currently has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel management systems. For hotels relying on multiple systems, IN-Gauge’s established integrations provide a significant advantage. Edge: IN-Gauge.
IN-Gauge's recent reviews demonstrate a high overall rating of 80.12 on the HT R Score, with a 97% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers across varied segments praise its analytics, ease of use, and support, especially for luxury and branded hotels.
Receptio has no available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Given the recent and abundant feedback for IN-Gauge, it is the clearly favored platform among hoteliers. Edge: IN-Gauge.
IN-Gauge is priced at a fixed $400 per month, with no trial or freemium options, offering a transparent, subscription-based model. Receptio’s pricing information is not publicly available, and absence of pricing details suggests it may require custom quotes or may be less transparent.
For hoteliers seeking predictable costs, IN-Gauge’s clear pricing model provides reassurance. Uncertainty around Receptio’s pricing complicates budgeting and planning, favoring IN-Gauge.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Edge: Larger hotels and chains should prioritize IN-Gauge for its feature depth.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Given the limited data and lack of review support, Receptio may only suit very small or experimental properties.
The core difference lies in their maturity and feature scope. IN-Gauge offers a comprehensive, well-supported platform with proven results, while Receptio remains an untested player with limited market presence.
Choose IN-Gauge if your hotel aims to optimize revenue through detailed analytics, multi-channel marketing, and motivated staff. It’s the smarter, more reliable choice backed by a large user base and recent reviews.
Receptio might appeal if you seek simple automation and are operating on a tight budget, but its unproven support and limited features make it less suitable for most hotels. For now, IN-Gauge stands out as the more dependable solution for revenue-driven hoteliers.
Upselling Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) and Receptio share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat) | ||
| Multi-Property/Chain Dashboard | ||
| Offer Experimentation & A/B Testing | ||
| Offer Templates Library | ||
| Room Upgrade Merchandising | ||
| Type 2 SOC 2 Certified (Data Security) |
Showing top differences. 5 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"What I like about FPG's solution are the many facilities, including the mobile app, the detailed figures and the professional communication from the FPG team. The on-site training..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"FPG enabled a standardized upselling process, improved guest satisfaction, increased operational efficiency, user-friendly tool for Ambassadors, strong training and motivation."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The software’s ability to track upsells and report metrics is frequently praised for aiding sales performance. While many find it helpful, a few users... The software’s ability to track upsells and report metrics is frequently praised for aiding sales performance. While many find it helpful, a few users point out the need for enhanced customization options in reporting.
Users commend the software's user-friendly interface, making it easy for staff to navigate and integrate with existing hotel systems. It simplifies pr... Users commend the software's user-friendly interface, making it easy for staff to navigate and integrate with existing hotel systems. It simplifies processes like team goal tracking and upselling, providing direct access through a well-structured platform.
Many reviewers mention the benefit of setting specific team and individual goals. The metrics tracking capability of the software is often cited as a... Many reviewers mention the benefit of setting specific team and individual goals. The metrics tracking capability of the software is often cited as a key factor in driving sales improvements and accountability.
Where hoteliers push back
Despite its comprehensive tracking capabilities, some reviews note occasional lapses in automatic data updates, leading teams to resort to manual trac... Despite its comprehensive tracking capabilities, some reviews note occasional lapses in automatic data updates, leading teams to resort to manual tracking of upsell metrics intermittently.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) and Receptio share many core Upselling Software features, but each has unique capabilities. IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) offers 3 verified integration partners, while Receptio offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group) leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
IN-Gauge (by Frontline Performance Group): No. Receptio: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Upselling Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Frontline Performance Group has an HT Score of 81 and Syspay has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor