The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 207 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ResNexus shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Softstar shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 207 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 207 | 0 |
After analyzing 207 verified reviews, ResNexus users most value its customer satisfaction & support, website design & user experience, continuous feature enhancements, while Softstar users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Softstar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Satisfaction & Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Website Design & User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Feature Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Data Analytics & Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customizable Housekeeping & Maintenance Features
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #12 96 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #24 25 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #24 4 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #12 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #20 43 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #20 22 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #29 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 195 reviews | — |
| Europe | #41 2 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #37 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between ResNexus PMS and Softstar hinges on your hotel's operational needs and strategic priorities. Both products aim to streamline property management, yet they serve different segments and feature sets.
ResNexus offers a comprehensive, highly-rated PMS with extensive integrations, proven support, and a broad feature set tailored to various property types. Softstar, by contrast, is an AI-driven property management platform with a focus on automation and property insights, but it lacks user reviews and detailed feature data.
Are you seeking a deeply integrated PMS with a track record of reliability? Or are you exploring a flexible, AI-powered solution to optimize property performance? Let’s compare these options more precisely.
ResNexus’s strengths lie in its well-established, feature-rich platform, favored for its ease of use, support, and extensive integrations. It has a 4.72/5 rating for ease of use, supported by 186 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its intuitive interface and reliable customer service.
Softstar, by contrast, has no available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or ease of use. Its capabilities revolve around AI-driven analytics and automation, but without user feedback, its real-world effectiveness remains uncertain.
Given the stark difference in user reviews and recent data, ResNexus’s offering appears more validated and trustworthy. Are you willing to risk unreviewed software without proven support? Or do you prefer a solution with a strong track record? The choice hinges on this confidence.
If your hotel needs a proven, comprehensive PMS with extensive integrations and a wide array of features, go with ResNexus. It’s ideal for small to mid-sized properties—like inns, bed & breakfasts, and boutique hotels—that benefit from a user-friendly system and reliable support.
Softstar might appeal if your team seeks AI-powered insights for optimizing property performance and automating routine tasks. However, due to the lack of reviews and detailed feature insights, it’s better suited for tech-savvy operators open to testing emerging solutions.
For hotels prioritizing stability, support, and proven functionalities, ResNexus is the clear choice. For innovative, data-driven management and if you’re willing to accept unverified user experiences, Softstar could be a consideration.
ResNexus’s ease of use is rated at 4.72/5, backed by 186 recent reviews, many praising its intuitive drag-and-drop reservation management, automated communication, and straightforward onboarding process. Users emphasize that their team quickly adapts and finds the system reliable.
Softstar offers no reviews or user ratings, so its usability cannot be assessed directly. Without feedback, it’s impossible to confirm if the platform is user-friendly, especially for staff unfamiliar with AI-based management tools.
Edge: ResNexus.
ResNexus provides over 50 exclusive features, including channel management, revenue tracking, online check-in/out, guest communication, integrated payment processing, and housekeeping modules. These are supported by a centralized user management system and multi-lingual, multi-currency capabilities.
Softstar has no detailed feature list or integrations available publicly, making it impossible to compare feature sets confidently. Its value appears primarily rooted in AI-driven insights and automation, but without explicit feature disclosures, ResNexus’s established suite clearly surpasses it.
Edge: ResNexus.
ResNexus’s customer support scores 4.86/5, with reviewers citing prompt, knowledgeable assistance and responsive onboarding. Recent reviews emphasize the support team’s personal attention and effectiveness, even as some mention staffing fluctuations during holidays.
Softstar has no available reviews or support ratings, leaving its customer service quality unverified. This lack of feedback is a significant concern when evaluating support reliability.
Edge: ResNexus.
ResNexus connects with 17 verified partners, including major OTAs like Booking.com, Airbnb, Expedia, and technology providers like Lightspeed and Canary Technologies. These integrations are central to reducing double bookings and maintaining synchronized inventory.
Softstar has no known integrations or partners documented, limiting its appeal for properties needing a connected, automated system. Its value proposition appears more standalone and less ecosystem-oriented.
Edge: ResNexus.
ResNexus’s reviews reveal a high level of satisfaction, with a 97% likelihood to recommend and a recent NPS score of 9.66/10. Hoteliers, especially in the bed & breakfast segment, praise its simplicity, support, and feature set.
There are no reviews for Softstar, leaving its user ratings and property segment satisfaction unknown. In absence of feedback, ResNexus’s high user rating makes it the more credible choice.
Edge: ResNexus.
ResNexus charges a flat $800 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial period available. It does not have a per-room pricing model, simplifying budgeting but possibly less flexible for small properties.
Softstar’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, making direct comparison impossible. Given the lack of detailed costs or trial options, ResNexus’s transparent pricing provides clearer value assessment.
Not ideal if you prefer highly customizable, niche, or AI-heavy solutions without proven support. Larger hotel chains needing enterprise-level integrations may find ResNexus’s scope limited.
Not ideal if you require proven, supported systems with extensive integrations. Hotels needing standard property management functions and documented user feedback should proceed cautiously.
ResNexus is a well-established PMS with a proven track record, extensive features, and high customer satisfaction backed by recent reviews. Its user-friendly interface and broad integrations make it suitable for properties that need reliability and support.
Softstar, while promising in its AI capabilities, lacks user feedback, detailed features, or documented integrations. It appears better suited for innovative, tech-forward teams willing to experiment with unverified solutions.
If your hotel values stability, proven support, and a feature-rich environment, ResNexus is the clear choice. If your team is focused on cutting-edge, AI-powered insights and can tolerate less proven platforms, Softstar might be worth exploring—but with caution.
This comprehensive comparison aims to guide your decision with clarity and confidence, emphasizing what current users experience and what data supports each option.
According to HTR's product database, ResNexus PMS and Softstar share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Numerous reviews emphasize the high-quality customer support from ResNexus, highlighting prompt and knowledgeable assistance. Despite this, some users... Numerous reviews emphasize the high-quality customer support from ResNexus, highlighting prompt and knowledgeable assistance. Despite this, some users express concerns about staffing turnover and occasional delays in response times, particularly during weekends and holidays.
ResNexus excels in providing aesthetically pleasing and functional website designs, often leading to increased direct bookings. However, users sometim... ResNexus excels in providing aesthetically pleasing and functional website designs, often leading to increased direct bookings. However, users sometimes find the integration with the booking engine and customizing the website layout HTML-intensive. They also request more user-friendly design templates.
Reviewers consistently mention the regular updates and improvements made by ResNexus, ensuring the platform stays ahead in meeting the evolving needs... Reviewers consistently mention the regular updates and improvements made by ResNexus, ensuring the platform stays ahead in meeting the evolving needs of the hospitality industry. Some users, however, feel the frequent updates occasionally introduce glitches or require time to get used to new features.
Where hoteliers push back
ResNexus's housekeeping and maintenance features are seen as robust yet sometimes cumbersome. Users request better integration with front desk operati... ResNexus's housekeeping and maintenance features are seen as robust yet sometimes cumbersome. Users request better integration with front desk operations and more customizable options for housekeeping and maintenance task assignments.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ResNexus PMS and Softstar share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ResNexus PMS offers 17 verified integration partners, while Softstar offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ResNexus PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ResNexus PMS: No. Softstar: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ResNexus has an HT Score of 31 and Softstar has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor