The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
SS&C shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 322 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 322 | 0 |
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, RMS users most value its technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support, while SS&C users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 147 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #8 102 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #8 14 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #7 8 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #11 100 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #13 57 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 50 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 65 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #11 63 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #23 20 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #12 10 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #8 7 reviews | — |
When choosing a property management system, your hotel needs a solution that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and provides reliable support. RMS by RMS stands out as the more established and reviewed product, with a broad feature set tailored to diverse property types. Conversely, TimeShareWare by SS&C focuses heavily on shared-ownership resorts and timeshare operations but lacks recent user feedback. Which platform best aligns with your hotel’s specific needs?
RMS is designed to serve a wide range of hotel types, from boutique hotels to motels, offering a comprehensive suite of features out-of-the-box. It integrates reservation management, channel management, guest profiles, and revenue tools, making it suitable for properties aiming to streamline operations and maximize revenue. TimeShareWare, on the other hand, is specialized for timeshare and resort operators, offering tailored modules for sales, owner services, and multi-site management. If your hotel focuses on traditional lodging, RMS’s broader applicability makes it the superior choice.
RMS boasts a high customer satisfaction rate, with a 4.56/5 overall rating based on 293 reviews, including 20 recent ones, reflecting current user experiences. TimeShareWare’s lack of recent reviews and lower market presence suggest it is less tested in contemporary hotel environments. Do your hotel’s operational needs align more with RMS’s extensive, adaptable features or TimeShareWare’s niche focus?
If your hotel needs a flexible, full-featured PMS that can handle multiple property types and scale with growth, RMS is the clear choice. Its rich feature set includes integrated CRS, online support, payment processing, booking engine, guest CRM, and detailed reporting—features that over 70 countries rely on. TimeShareWare is better suited for resort operators managing vacation clubs or fractional properties, with features focused on owner management and timeshare sales. For traditional hotels or multi-use properties, RMS provides a more comprehensive and proven platform.
Given RMS’s extensive international presence and proven scalability, it’s ideal for hotels looking to optimize daily operations while maintaining guest satisfaction. TimeShareWare’s specialization might limit its utility outside resort and timeshare contexts. Therefore, your choice hinges on your property’s operational complexity and growth plans.
RMS scores a 4.28/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its user-friendly interface and straightforward booking charts. Onboarding is rated 4.12/5, and recent reviews mention quick, smooth implementation, with Victoria Curley from Roomzzz describing onboarding as “the easiest I’ve had.” Customers also highlight proactive support, with many praising RMS’s knowledgeable team.
TimeShareWare’s ease of use and onboarding ratings aren’t available, making it difficult to assess its user-friendliness. Given RMS’s high scores and recent positive reviews, it is the more dependable choice for staff adoption. Edge: RMS.
RMS offers 74 unique features, including integrated CRS, online payments, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, group booking, and automated night audit. Its extensive feature set supports complex operations, revenue optimization, and guest engagement, making it a versatile platform.
TimeShareWare, by comparison, does not list a specific number of features but is tailored for timeshare and resort management, focusing on owner relations, multi-site management, and sales modules. It lacks the broad functionality RMS provides for traditional hotels. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s customer support receives a 4.48/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing its prompt, helpful, and friendly service. Users appreciate the proactive support team and the availability of resources, which helps maximize system utility.
TimeShareWare has no recent reviews or publicly available support ratings, making it hard to evaluate support quality. RMS’s proven track record and recent positive feedback give it the edge in customer service. Edge: RMS.
RMS boasts 112 verified partners, including major OTAs and system integrations like Whistle, Criton, RMS, Sage, and others. Its extensive partner network enables seamless connectivity with revenue, marketing, and operational tools.
TimeShareWare has only one verified partner, limiting its integration capabilities. For hotels seeking a flexible, interconnected ecosystem, RMS’s broad array of integrations makes it the clear choice. Edge: RMS.
RMS enjoys a 4.56/5 overall rating, with recent reviews from diverse property types including boutique hotels, motels, and resorts. Its users, especially in independent and boutique segments, frequently praise its ease of use, feature depth, and support.
There are no recent reviews or ratings available for TimeShareWare, indicating a lack of current user feedback or widespread hotel adoption. Given RMS’s high and recent review scores, hotelier preference clearly favors RMS. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s pricing begins at $800 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees, making it a transparent and predictable investment. Pricing for TimeShareWare is not publicly disclosed, which is common for enterprise solutions but can be a barrier for smaller hotels.
Given RMS’s clear pricing model and value ratings, your team can assess ROI with confidence. The lack of available pricing for TimeShareWare suggests it may be more suited for larger, resort-focused operations with specific needs.
Not ideal if your hotel operates solely as a timeshare resort or vacation club, as RMS doesn’t specialize in that niche.
Not ideal if your hotel is a traditional lodging property seeking broad property management features outside the timeshare or resort domain.
RMS and TimeShareWare serve distinct market segments. RMS is a versatile, full-featured PMS suitable for a wide range of property types, especially those aiming for growth and operational efficiency. TimeShareWare excels in niche resort and timeshare environments, providing specialized tools for owner relations and multi-site management.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable platform with proven support and extensive integrations, RMS is the smarter choice. For resorts and timeshare operations that require owner-focused modules, TimeShareWare might be appropriate, but its limited recent reviews make it a less confident option for most hoteliers.
RMS’s extensive review base, recent performance data, and broad feature set position it as the recommended choice for hotels seeking a trusted, comprehensive property management system. The lack of recent user feedback for TimeShareWare signals caution unless your operation specifically matches its niche.
Note: The detailed review data and feature specifics support RMS as the clearer choice, especially given its recent review activity and high user ratings.
According to HTR's product database, RMS and TimeShareWare share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. RMS and TimeShareWare share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. RMS offers 112 verified integration partners, while TimeShareWare offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RMS: No. TimeShareWare: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. RMS has an HT Score of 90 and SS&C has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor