The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Uplisting shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 322 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 322 | 0 |
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, RMS users most value its technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support, while Uplisting users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 147 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #8 102 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #8 14 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #7 8 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #11 100 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #13 57 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 50 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 65 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #11 63 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #23 20 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #12 10 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #8 7 reviews | — |
Choosing between RMS by RMS and Uplisting by Uplisting hinges on your hotel’s operational complexity and growth ambitions. RMS offers a broad suite of features tailored to a variety of property types, including large resorts and RV parks, with a proven track record supported by extensive recent reviews. Uplisting, on the other hand, is more niche-focused on short-term rentals, but its limited review data makes RMS the clearer choice for most hotels seeking a comprehensive property management system.
RMS and Uplisting both aim to streamline hotel management, but RMS’s extensive feature set and wider market presence make it more suited for traditional hotels and larger properties. RMS’s recent reviews, totaling over 290 with recent feedback from 20 users in the last six months, showcase a solid reputation for functionality, support, and ease of use. Uplisting’s absence of ratings and reviews makes it difficult to assess its current performance or customer satisfaction.
RMS excels in integrating complex operations—offering over 74 unique features, including integrated channel management, trust accounting, and a booking engine—while Uplisting’s capabilities seem more tailored for short-term rentals without the same depth. RMS’s recent review scores (4.56/5 overall, 4.28/5 ease of use) reinforce its standing as a trusted hotel management tool, whereas Uplisting’s lack of recent feedback leaves its effectiveness unverified.
Do you need a robust, all-in-one hotel PMS that can handle diverse operational needs with proven support? RMS’s recent reviews and feature depth suggest it’s the more reliable choice.
If your hotel seeks a comprehensive property management system with extensive integrations, reporting, and guest management tools, RMS is the clear choice. Its suite of over 74 features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, revenue management, and multi-lingual support, make it suitable for hotels of all sizes—especially those with complex operational demands.
Uplisting may appeal to operators focused solely on short-term rentals or smaller portfolios, but its lack of review data and feature depth (no unique features listed) make it less suitable for traditional hotel environments. If scalability, support, and proven performance matter to you, RMS will serve your team better.
RMS boasts a 4.28/5 ease of use rating, supported by recent reviews praising its user-friendly interface, straightforward booking chart, and quick onboarding process—often highlighted as the easiest onboarding among similar systems. Support is rated 4.48/5, with many users commenting on helpful, knowledgeable assistance and positive experiences with customer service.
Uplisting’s user-friendliness cannot be assessed given the absence of recent reviews or ratings. Its core focus on simplifying short-term rental management suggests a streamlined interface, but without user feedback, RMS’s demonstrated ease of use clearly edges it out.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s feature set is far more comprehensive, including 74 unique functions such as integrated CRS, online support, payment processing, revenue management, group booking, housekeeping, guest CRM, and multi-currency support—many features tailored for large or multi-property hotels. Uplisting’s features are not detailed, but it appears to focus primarily on basic property management, guest communication, and calendar synchronization, lacking the extensive suite RMS offers.
For properties needing advanced revenue and inventory management, RMS’s deep feature library is unmatched. If your operation demands a full-scale PMS with automation and reporting, RMS is the clear winner.
Edge: RMS.
RMS is rated 4.48/5 for customer support, with recent reviews highlighting fast, helpful assistance. Customers praise its proactive support team and the availability of online resources—many reviewers mention support staff’s patience and technical expertise.
Uplisting’s support ratings and recent customer feedback are unavailable, leaving RMS’s support reputation as the stronger option. Given the importance of reliable support for hotel operations, RMS’s positive recent reviews make it the safer choice.
Edge: RMS.
RMS boasts 112 verified partner integrations, including major OTAs and systems like Criton, Sage, and STR, providing extensive connectivity for complex hotel operations. Uplisting only lists 2 verified partners, with shared integrations including Duve and PriceLabs, indicating limited connectivity.
If seamless integrations with booking channels, POS systems, and revenue tools are vital, RMS’s extensive partner network provides a significant advantage.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s recent reviews reflect a high overall rating of 4.56/5, with a strong likelihood to recommend of 86%. Hotels across segments like resorts and boutique properties praise RMS for its user-friendliness and support, with some reviews noting improved operational efficiency.
Uplisting’s lack of recent reviews makes it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Based on available data, RMS’s proven reputation and recent positive feedback clearly lead.
Edge: RMS.
RMS has a listed base price of $800/month, with no free trial or tiered pricing detailed. Uplisting’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, making direct comparison impossible.
Given RMS’s transparent pricing model, your team can evaluate ROI more effectively. The lack of pricing info for Uplisting leaves its value proposition uncertain for most hoteliers.
RMS and Uplisting target different segments; RMS’s comprehensive suite and recent positive reviews make it suitable for traditional hotels and larger properties. Uplisting’s focus on short-term rentals and lack of recent, verified feedback make it less suitable for larger hotel environments.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich system with proven support, RMS is the obvious choice. For smaller, rental-focused operations, Uplisting could be enough, but its limited review data doesn’t provide confidence for most hoteliers.
RMS’s recent review volume and ratings confirm its standing as a reliable, well-supported hotel management platform. Uplisting’s limited publicly available data suggest it’s not yet a proven option for most traditional hotels.
According to HTR's product database, RMS and Uplisting share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. RMS and Uplisting share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. RMS offers 112 verified integration partners, while Uplisting offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RMS: No. Uplisting: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. RMS has an HT Score of 91 and Uplisting has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor