The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 323 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
RMS shines in customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
WavePM shines in ease of use and ROI .
Side-by-side ratings based on 323 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 322 | 1 |
After analyzing 323 verified reviews, RMS users most value its technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support, while WavePM users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
WavePM |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
WavePM |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 147 reviews | #61 1 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #8 102 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #8 14 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #7 8 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
WavePM |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #11 100 reviews | #66 1 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #13 57 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 50 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 65 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
WavePM |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #11 63 reviews | #61 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #23 20 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #12 10 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #8 7 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can profoundly impact your hotel's efficiency and guest satisfaction. RMS by RMS and WavePM by WavePM both aim to streamline operations but serve very different segments and needs. RMS offers a comprehensive, industry-proven platform with extensive features and a broad global presence, while WavePM emphasizes AI-driven automation and modern design, albeit with limited market reach. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific operational priorities—are you seeking a proven, feature-rich solution, or a cutting-edge platform with innovative tools?
While RMS boasts a rich feature set supported by nearly 300 reviews and recent feedback from over 20 users, WavePM’s singular review and minimal user base make its claims less substantiated. RMS’s 4.56-star rating reflects consistent satisfaction across multiple hotel segments, particularly in independent and boutique hotels. In contrast, WavePM’s zero ratings and a single review limit confidence in its capabilities. Do you prefer a mature platform with proven reliability or a newer, AI-focused system with untested market traction?
RMS by RMS and WavePM by WavePM both aim to improve hotel operations, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. RMS provides a complete suite of property management tools, from bookings and channel management to guest profiles and revenue reporting, tailored for hotels needing detailed control and scalability. WavePM, while claiming to leverage AI for automation and insights, remains largely untested in real hotel environments, with only one recent review and no detailed user feedback.
The core divergence lies in RMS’s focus on operational depth and proven reliability versus WavePM’s emphasis on modern AI features and flexibility. RMS’s extensive set of 74 unique features, including integrated CRS, trust accounting, and multi-lingual support, caters to hotels with complex needs and larger portfolios. Conversely, WavePM’s strengths are less clear, with all reviews highlighting its architecture without specific feature references, suggesting a focus on architecture over practical deployment.
Are you prioritizing proven feature depth and global support, or are you willing to experiment with an untested platform promising future AI-powered automation?
If your hotel needs a mature, fully integrated PMS with solid support, RMS is the clear choice. Its extensive features—including online bookings, revenue management, integrated POS, and multi-currency support—are designed for properties of all sizes, especially those seeking scalability and operational control. RMS’s proven track record, with over 7,000 users worldwide and detailed case studies demonstrating growth and efficiency, makes it suitable for hotels looking for reliability and comprehensive management.
WavePM, on the other hand, suits teams that want to explore AI-driven property management, particularly if your hotel is smaller or more tech-savvy. Its architecture promises flexibility and future growth, but the lack of reviews and limited regional presence (only in one country) mean you’re betting on potential rather than proven results. It may appeal if your hotel is open to adopting newer technology and prioritizes custom automation over extensive existing features.
In summary, choose RMS if operational robustness and proven performance matter most. Opt for WavePM if you’re a tech-forward hotel willing to risk untested software to access innovative AI tools.
RMS scores a solid 4.28 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviewers praising its user-friendly booking chart and intuitive interface. The onboarding process is rated at 4.12, reflecting a generally smooth setup, though some users note a learning curve in mastering its extensive features. Support staff are praised for their helpfulness, yet some mention delays due to time zones, hinting at room for support process improvements.
WavePM claims a perfect 5/5 rating for ease of use, emphasizing its modern, architectural build designed for simplicity. However, with only one review and no detailed user feedback, it’s difficult to verify how easily new users can learn or adopt the platform. The limited reviews make RMS the safer choice for hotels that require proven, well-documented usability.
Edge: RMS.
RMS offers an impressive 74 unique features not found in WavePM, including integrated channel management, trust accounting, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, and automated night audits. Its features cover nearly every operational need for hotels, from guest profiles to multi-lingual support and digital registration, providing a full-stack solution.
WavePM, by contrast, highlights its architecture and AI capabilities rather than specific features. The platform promises flexibility and modernization but offers no detailed feature list or unique tools beyond its AI-driven automation and tenant management focus. Given RMS’s extensive feature set and proven integrations, it clearly leads in offering comprehensive operational tools.
Edge: RMS.
RMS scores 4.48 out of 5 for customer support, with reviews praising its proactive, knowledgeable team and quick responses. Customers appreciate the ease of reaching support and the helpfulness of staff like Makiko and Tara, though some mention support delays due to time zone differences, indicating potential for service improvements.
WavePM has a support rating of 4/5, with reviews describing its architecture and system design but lacking detailed feedback on customer support quality. With only one review and no direct mentions of support, RMS’s established global support network and extensive review history give it a clear advantage.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s 4.56/5 rating, backed by 293 reviews—20 of which are recent—indicates a high level of satisfaction across various hotel segments, especially independent and boutique properties. Hoteliers value its reliability, feature depth, and support, with comments highlighting its role in boosting operational efficiency and guest experience.
WavePM offers no publicly available ratings or reviews, with only a single review and no recent data. Its untested status and lack of hotel feedback mean it cannot meaningfully compete in terms of user satisfaction.
Edge: RMS.
RMS is priced at a $800 monthly base fee, with no free trial, freemium, or tiered pricing plans. Its straightforward pricing model makes budgeting predictable, but the high entry cost may be a barrier for smaller hotels.
WavePM’s pricing details are not publicly available, and it offers no trial or demo information. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to compare value directly, but the absence of published costs suggests it may be targeted at larger or enterprise clients willing to negotiate bespoke arrangements.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
RMS by RMS is a mature, well-supported PMS with a comprehensive feature set that has been tested and trusted worldwide. Its extensive integrations, proven performance, and detailed reviews make it a dependable choice for hotels seeking operational control and scalability.
WavePM by WavePM offers a modern, architecture-focused platform promising AI-driven automation. However, with limited reviews and a nascent market presence, it remains a less certain choice, best suited for hotels eager to experiment with emerging technology.
Choose RMS if you value proven reliability, extensive features, and global support. Opt for WavePM if your hotel is comfortable with untested software and eager to explore AI-enabled management tools.
According to HTR's product database, RMS and WavePM share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
WavePM |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. RMS and WavePM share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. RMS offers 112 verified integration partners, while WavePM offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. WavePM leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RMS: No. WavePM: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. RMS has an HT Score of 91 and WavePM has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor