The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Winner Hotel Software shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 34 | 0 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, Shiji Group users most value its ease of use, support team, implementation, while Winner Hotel Software users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #53 2 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #31 17 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #11 13 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #22 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #33 17 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #24 25 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #22 19 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #45 2 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #33 4 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #30 8 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #14 5 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #5 14 reviews | — |
You’re evaluating two property management systems (PMS): Shiji Daylight PMS by Shiji Group and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews). Both aim to streamline hotel operations, centralize guest data, and enhance guest experiences. While Shiji Daylight has a proven track record with more reviews, recent feedback, and a broader feature set, Winner PMS emphasizes ease of use and simplified workflows. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Are you prioritizing comprehensive features, global presence, and detailed reporting? Or is a straightforward, intuitive platform more critical? Let’s compare both products across key considerations.
Shiji Daylight PMS, with a 74.68/100 score from HotelTechReport and 32 reviews, offers a feature-rich, cloud-native solution designed for hotels of all sizes. In contrast, Winner PMS has no recent reviews or scores but is recognized for its straightforward interface and smooth workflow. The core difference lies in their market presence and depth of features: Shiji’s extensive capabilities support complex operations, while Winner emphasizes simplicity.
Both aim to centralize guest data and streamline operations, but Shiji’s broader integration options and more mature platform make it suitable for larger or multi-property hotels. Winner’s minimal feature set and ease of use may appeal to boutique hotels or properties seeking quick deployment. Are you looking for a feature-heavy, scalable system or a leaner, user-friendly alternative?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-packed PMS with global reach, go with Shiji Daylight. It’s ideal for hotel groups of any size, especially those requiring advanced reporting, multi-currency handling, and extensive integrations. Its robust feature set supports complex guest profiles, automation, and multi-property management.
If your hotel prioritizes simplicity, quick onboarding, and straightforward operations, Winner PMS might be better. Its intuitive interface and focus on core functions suit boutique hotels or small chains with limited technical resources. However, consider that Winner’s limited review data suggests less proven scalability and fewer integrations.
Shiji Daylight PMS scores a 4.63/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive interface, helpful training materials, and straightforward task execution. Users highlight that new team members can quickly learn and operate the system, reducing onboarding time. Despite some performance concerns, the overall usability facilitates staff adoption and minimizes training hassles.
Winner PMS’s usability is less documented, with no recent reviews available to evaluate its user experience. Given its reputation for streamlining workflows and simplifying hotel operations, it’s likely designed with ease of use in mind. However, without recent data, certainty is limited.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS boasts 98 unique features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and a sophisticated booking engine. It supports digital registration, guest messaging, task management, and extensive reporting, covering the full scope of hotel operations.
Winner PMS, with no specified features, is positioned as a straightforward system largely focused on core reservations, check-ins, billing, and housekeeping. Its simplicity might lack advanced features like automated space optimization or detailed guest profiles.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji receives a 4.53/5 support rating, with reviews praising its helpful, responsive support team and comprehensive onboarding. Many users mention that their support experience significantly eased deployment and troubleshooting.
Winner PMS’s support reputation remains unreviewed, with no recent testimonials to assess responsiveness or quality. Given Shiji’s consistent positive feedback, it currently holds the advantage in customer support.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS integrates with 64 verified partners, including industry leaders like SiteMinder, IDeaS, Duetto, Amadeus, and Oaky. These integrations enable seamless connectivity with CRS, revenue management, distribution, and EPoS systems, supporting complex multi-system workflows.
Winner PMS has only one verified partner—Mews—limiting its integration scope. This restricts its ability to connect with other hotel technology solutions, which could impact larger or more complex operations.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS’s 32 reviews reflect a 90% likelihood to recommend, with consistent praise for user-friendliness, feature depth, and support. Hoteliers from diverse segments—luxury hotels, city center, and branded properties—rate it highly, especially valuing its scalability and reporting.
Without recent reviews for Winner PMS, it’s impossible to gauge user sentiment. The lack of data suggests that Shiji Daylight PMS is the more trusted choice among hoteliers today.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS costs $1,200 per month with no trial or implementation fees, offering a predictable, subscription-based pricing model. Specific pricing details for Winner PMS are unavailable, but as a SaaS solution, it likely follows a similar subscription structure, possibly with custom quotes based on hotel size.
Given the detailed pricing info for Shiji, hotels can budget confidently; Winner’s lack of transparent pricing warrants direct inquiry.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with simple routines, and minimal IT resources.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced automation, integrations, or detailed analytics.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich solution with proven scalability, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction. Its strong global presence and ongoing positive reviews make it suitable for hotels aiming to upgrade their operations and guest experience.
Winner PMS provides a streamlined, easy-to-use platform for smaller hotels or those new to PMS solutions, focusing on core functionalities and fast onboarding. However, limited recent data and integrations suggest it’s less suited for larger or complex hotel portfolios.
Choose Shiji if you require depth, scale, and proven reliability. Opt for Winner if you prioritize simplicity, quick setup, and minimal complexity.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Shiji Daylight PMS and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Shiji Daylight PMS and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Shiji Daylight PMS offers 65 verified integration partners, while Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Winner PMS (acquired by Mews): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Shiji Group has an HT Score of 75 and Winner Hotel Software has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property