The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 105 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Sirvoy shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
CMSol shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 105 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 105 | 0 |
After analyzing 105 verified reviews, Sirvoy users most value its customer support, ease of use, reservation management, while CMSol users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface and Design
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Functionality Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Adaptability
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost and Value for Money
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 36 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #48 3 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #46 1 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #27 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #29 21 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #37 7 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #42 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #35 3 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #23 16 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #16 31 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #13 6 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #27 0 reviews | — |
Choosing between Sirvoy by Sirvoy and Visual Hotel by CMSol hinges on your hotel’s needs, budget, and expectations for support. Both platforms aim to streamline operations, but Sirvoy offers a comprehensive, feature-rich system with a proven track record, while CMSol’s offerings are less documented, with no available reviews or features listed. Your decision should focus on whether you prioritize an established system with extensive user feedback or a less proven platform that may lack critical features.
Sirvoy’s extensive user base and recent reviews provide a clearer picture of its capabilities than CMSol, which has zero reviews. This makes Sirvoy the more reliable option for hoteliers looking for proven performance and ongoing support.
Sirvoy is a well-established property management system (PMS) with a solid reputation, boasting a 95 review count and recent feedback from active users. It covers core hotel operations like reservations, channel management, payment processing, and guest communication, all within an intuitive interface. Meanwhile, CMSol is a newer entrant with no reviews or feature disclosures, making it impossible to assess its suitability.
Sirvoy’s reviews highlight its ease of use, excellent customer support, and affordability, which are crucial for small to medium-sized properties. CMSol’s lack of reviews and features leaves hoteliers uncertain about its effectiveness or reliability.
Are you seeking a proven, well-supported PMS with a broad feature set? Or are you willing to explore an untested platform without available feedback? Your choice depends on your appetite for risk and the importance of support and proven functionality.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich PMS with a long track record, go with Sirvoy. Its 95 reviews—over 32 in the last six months—demonstrate consistent positive feedback, especially in ease of use (4.64/5) and customer support (4.85/5). It’s ideal for small to medium-sized properties seeking an affordable, integrated system with channel management, booking engine, and guest communication.
If your hotel is open to testing a new platform without existing reviews or clear feature details, CMSol might be worth exploring. However, without any user feedback or feature disclosures, it’s difficult to justify over Sirvoy, especially given the critical need for reliability in hotel operations.
In summary, unless CMSol releases reviews or features, Sirvoy remains the more strategic choice for hoteliers seeking stability and proven performance.
Sirvoy scores 4.64/5 in ease of use, reflecting its intuitive, user-friendly interface praised by many users. Its onboarding process averages 4.6/5, with support staff providing quick, helpful assistance, as highlighted by reviews stating support is “superb” and “responsive.” Users find the system straightforward, even with minimal prior experience.
CMSol offers no available review data or user feedback on usability, which makes assessing its ease of adoption impossible. The lack of reviews indicates limited real-world testing or user satisfaction insights.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy boasts 43 unique features, including multi-lingual support, multi-currency, direct billing, channel management, booking engine, guest messaging, online check-in/out, integrated payment processing, and advanced reporting tools. These cover most operational needs and are frequently cited as reasons for its popularity.
CMSol provides no details about features or capabilities, making it impossible to compare. Without feature disclosures or user reviews, there’s no basis to evaluate its suitability.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s customer support is highly rated at 4.85/5, with users describing it as “quick,” “helpful,” and “thorough.” Many reviews emphasize support’s responsiveness, with testimonials praising the team for their clear guidance and prompt assistance—especially valuable for small properties or first-time PMS users.
There is no available review data for CMSol. Its lack of feedback suggests uncertain support quality, which is critical for ongoing hotel operations.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy integrates with 21 verified partners, including major channels like Bookboost, SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate. These connections streamline reservations, guest feedback, and revenue management, providing a broad ecosystem for hotel operations.
CMSol has zero verified integrations listed, limiting its appeal for hotels relying on third-party tools to maximize revenue, marketing, or guest satisfaction.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy has a strong overall rating of 83.93 on the HTTR Score, with 95 reviews, 32 of which are recent (last 6 months). Its score and recent positive feedback reflect ongoing satisfaction, especially among small to medium hotels, B&Bs, and hostels.
CMSol has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction or property-specific performance.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s pricing starts at $200/month with no free tier, trial, or mention of discounts. Its straightforward pricing structure makes it easy to budget, especially given its extensive feature set.
CMSol’s pricing details are unavailable, and no trial information exists. This lack of transparency complicates assessing its value proposition.
If cost and known value are priorities, Sirvoy’s transparent pricing provides clarity.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Sirvoy is a battle-tested PMS with a solid reputation, extensive features, and recent positive reviews. Its ease of use, support quality, and broad integrations make it suitable for most small to medium properties.
Visual Hotel, on the other hand, has no reviews or detailed features available, making it a risky choice unless you are willing to experiment without proof of performance. Its AI capabilities might appeal to very tech-forward hotels, but the lack of user feedback is a significant concern.
If your priority is a dependable, well-rounded system with proven support, Sirvoy is the clear choice. CMSol may be worth watching for future updates, but currently, it lacks the credibility needed for critical hotel operations.
According to HTR's product database, Sirvoy and Visual Hotel share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 31 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suite... Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suites or offering package deals are noted as areas that require enhancement.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved fin... Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved financial and invoicing features. There's also feedback on the lack of advanced CRM options and difficulties in integrating upselling features.
Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wis... Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wish for more flexibility in invoice customization and dynamic billing options.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Sirvoy and Visual Hotel share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Sirvoy offers 21 verified integration partners, while Visual Hotel offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Sirvoy leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Sirvoy: No. Visual Hotel: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Sirvoy has an HT Score of 85 and CMSol has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor