The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 56 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Aven Hospitality shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Reporting Dashboard.
Xn protel Systems shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 56 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 56 | 0 |
After analyzing 56 verified reviews, Aven Hospitality users most value its ease of use and user experience, connectivity and distribution reach, innovation and technology updates, while Xn protel Systems users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Connectivity and Distribution Reach
▾
|
|
|
+
Innovation and Technology Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine Performance
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customer Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
−
Technical Issues and Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #11 3 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #6 26 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #2 15 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #2 6 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 20 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #3 34 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #3 20 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 34 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #6 8 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 6 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #2 4 reviews | — |
Choosing the right reservation system is crucial for your hotel’s revenue, efficiency, and guest experience. Both SynXis Central Reservation System by Aven Hospitality and XMS Enterprise CRS aim to streamline booking management and distribution. While XMS Enterprise CRS claims to offer centralization for reservations, it lacks publicly available reviews or recent data, making it difficult to assess its real-world performance. Conversely, SynXis boasts a strong reputation, with over 50 recent reviews and an 80.5/100 HT Score, demonstrating its proven track record.
Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a product with a solid user base and recent feedback or whether the features and integration capabilities of XMS meet your needs without current user validation. Do you want a solution with proven stability and support, or are you open to exploring a less-reviewed, potentially customizable option?
SynXis is designed for hotels seeking a reliable, well-supported reservation system that excels in connectivity, ease of use, and multi-property management. It integrates with over 80 verified partners, supports extensive reporting, and is highly praised for its stability and user-friendly interface. The platform's core strength lies in its connectivity to OTAs, channel managers, and PMS systems, making it ideal for larger hotels or multi-property chains aiming for streamlined distribution.
XMS Enterprise CRS, on the other hand, markets itself as a centrally focused reservation platform with automated analytics and rate optimization. Yet, it offers no recent reviews or user ratings, which raises questions about its current operational stability and support. Without recent feedback, it’s difficult to confirm whether XMS can deliver on its promises or match SynXis in reliability.
Are you comfortable choosing a product with a proven track record, or are you willing to experiment with a lesser-known system lacking recent user validation?
If your hotel needs a proven, user-friendly reservation platform with extensive integrations, go with SynXis. Its strong review base, especially from hotels in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, indicates high satisfaction among independent, branded, and resort properties. Its extensive feature set, including channel management, booking engine, and guest profiles, makes it suitable for hotels looking to optimize distribution and revenue.
However, if your hotel relies heavily on a centralized reservation approach with advanced analytics and predictive pricing, and if you’re confident in implementing solutions with limited external validation, XMS might appeal. It claims to streamline bookings and inventory management but lacks recent reviews to confirm performance and support quality.
Given the data, SynXis’s established reputation and recent positive feedback make it the safer choice for most hoteliers.
SynXis receives a high ease-of-use rating of 4.38/5 from users, reflecting an intuitive interface and manageable onboarding process. Reviewers praise how straightforward it is to manage rates, reservations, and multi-property inventories, with some noting it reduces operational complexity.
XMS, however, has no publicly available user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess ease of use or onboarding quality. Without modern user feedback, it’s uncertain whether XMS offers a comparable, user-friendly experience.
Edge: SynXis.
SynXis offers a comprehensive suite with 16 unique features, including RMS connectivity, PMS integration, call center functions, geotargeted pricing, dynamic pricing, content management, and a booking engine. These features enable a full reservation and distribution management system tailored for multi-property hotels.
XMS does not publicly list specific features or provide comparable functionality. Its core focus appears to be on centralizing reservations and analytics, but without detailed feature disclosures, it’s unclear whether it offers the depth of SynXis’s capabilities.
Edge: SynXis.
SynXis scores a support rating of 4.07/5, with many users highlighting responsive account managers and proactive assistance. Clients appreciate the reliability and problem-solving capabilities, though some reviews mention delays and issues with system updates.
XMS has no recent reviews or support ratings available, leaving its customer service quality uncertain. With no feedback, you cannot confidently assess the support quality or responsiveness of XMS.
Edge: SynXis.
SynXis boasts 80 verified partners, including major OTAs, channel managers, and PMS systems, with 10 shared integrations that also connect with XMS. Its extensive integration network ensures connectivity across most platforms you might need.
XMS lists only 26 verified partners, with no publicly detailed integration list. The lack of recent reviews or data makes it difficult to confirm whether XMS’s integration ecosystem is as robust or comprehensive as SynXis’s.
Edge: SynXis.
SynXis’s overall rating of 4.2/5, based on 50 recent reviews, reflects strong satisfaction among a diverse hotel segment mix, including independent, branded, and resort hotels. The platform’s recent reviews highlight ease of use, connectivity, and support as key strengths.
XMS has no recent reviews or ratings, so it cannot be ranked or compared based on user feedback. Its lack of data suggests it is less proven or less adopted in the market.
Edge: SynXis.
SynXis’s pricing starts at $400 per month, with no mention of implementation fees or trial options. It operates on a straightforward monthly flat fee, making costs predictable for budgeting.
XMS does not publicly disclose price details, which suggests it may offer customized quotes or enterprise-level pricing. Without specific pricing, evaluating value for money is difficult.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, single-property solution or have limited budget for extensive features.
Not ideal if you require proven support, easy onboarding, or detailed feature transparency.
SynXis and XMS serve different priorities, but only SynXis has a proven track record backed by recent reviews and high satisfaction ratings. Its extensive integrations, user-friendly interface, and reliable support make it a solid choice for most hotels seeking a robust reservation platform.
If your hotel values stability, support, and proven features, SynXis is the clearer option, especially given its 50+ recent reviews and 80 partner integrations. Conversely, if your focus is on advanced analytics or predictive pricing, and you’re comfortable with less external validation, XMS might warrant consideration—though it currently lacks the reputation and review data to justify that risk.
For most hoteliers, SynXis’s recent positive reviews and extensive functionality make it the recommended solution. Its track record ensures you’re choosing a system that will support your hotel’s growth and operational needs now and into the future.
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, SynXis Central Reservation System and XMS Enterprise CRS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Availability Management | ||
| Call center functionality | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Geotargeted pricing module | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
| RMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 4 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Many users highlight SynXis CR's intuitive interface and ease of use for managing rates, reservations, and multiple properties. The seamless navigatio... Many users highlight SynXis CR's intuitive interface and ease of use for managing rates, reservations, and multiple properties. The seamless navigation and efficient design make it simple for hoteliers to perform complex tasks with minimal support. Users particularly appreciate the ability to make updates easily across multiple properties, which saves significant time.
Reviewers consistently praise SynXis for its superior connectivity to multiple OTAs and partners, which improves distribution reach and direct channel... Reviewers consistently praise SynXis for its superior connectivity to multiple OTAs and partners, which improves distribution reach and direct channel conversions. The platform offers high reliability and consistent performance for various distribution channels. The integration with PMS and RMS systems is seamless, allowing hoteliers to maintain data integrity across platforms.
Sabre's commitment to continuous innovation is well-received by users, who appreciate the regular updates and new capabilities being introduced to Syn... Sabre's commitment to continuous innovation is well-received by users, who appreciate the regular updates and new capabilities being introduced to SynXis. These updates reflect the company’s dedication to staying ahead of industry trends and addressing evolving customer needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support has a mixed reception; while some users find the support team helpful and responsive, others report significant delays in problem res... Customer support has a mixed reception; while some users find the support team helpful and responsive, others report significant delays in problem resolution and long wait times. Additionally, transitioning towards self-service support options has presented challenges for users needing quick and effective assistance.
While SynXis is recognized for its robust functionality, users express a need for quicker validation of enhancement requests and increased customizati... While SynXis is recognized for its robust functionality, users express a need for quicker validation of enhancement requests and increased customization options, especially for unique property needs. The delay in implementing new features and the limited scope for customization are recurring themes in the reviews.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. SynXis Central Reservation System and XMS Enterprise CRS share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. SynXis Central Reservation System offers 80 verified integration partners, while XMS Enterprise CRS offers 26. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SynXis Central Reservation System leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
SynXis Central Reservation System: No. XMS Enterprise CRS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Aven Hospitality has an HT Score of 81 and Xn protel Systems has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor