The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 27 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like On premise and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
SS&C shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 27 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 27 | 0 |
After analyzing 27 verified reviews, Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) users most value its ease of use and intuitive interface, reservation and front desk management, product stability and reliability, while SS&C users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Product Stability and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Detailed and Comprehensive Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Support Quality
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with Third-Party Platforms
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #19 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #72 1 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #51 2 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #67 0 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #48 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #44 0 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #27 1 reviews | — |
As a hotelier, you need a property management system that simplifies daily operations, enhances guest experiences, and scales with your growth. The choice often narrows between systems with proven track records and those still establishing their reputation. Given the available data, Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) offers a more robust and trusted solution, while SS&C’s TimeShareWare lacks recent reviews and industry-specific validation.
Both products aim to streamline reservations, billing, and housekeeping, but how do they truly compare on core hotel management needs? Are you looking for a system with extensive features and proven support, or is cost and simplicity your priority? Let’s examine how each stacks up across these critical areas.
ASI PMS and TimeShareWare serve different segments within the property management landscape, but they both attempt to address the fundamental needs of hotel operations. ASI offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a focus on traditional hotel management, boasting 47 unique features and a solid reputation backed by recent reviews from over 26 users. Its performance metrics highlight ease of use, customer support, and value for money.
TimeShareWare, by contrast, primarily targets timeshare and resort operations, not traditional hotels. It provides a broad suite of tools for shared-ownership resorts but lacks recent user reviews or detailed feature comparisons. Its focus is on managing multi-site timeshare operations rather than daily hotel front desk tasks.
Do you prioritize a proven hotel-specific system with extensive functionalities, or are you managing a timeshare operation that demands specialized resort management tools? The decision hinges on your specific hotel type and operational complexity.
If your hotel needs a scalable, user-friendly system with deep reporting, multi-channel management, and proven support, ASI PMS is the clear choice. Its 26 recent reviews and 77.4 score on HotelTechReport underscore its reliability and strong customer satisfaction, especially in North America and Asia Pacific markets.
TimeShareWare might suit resorts or timeshare operations with specific multi-site management needs, but its lack of recent reviews and limited hotel-centric features make it less suitable for traditional hotels. If your focus is on high guest turnover, real-time rate adjustments, and detailed guest profiles, ASI is the safer bet.
For hotels seeking a stable, well-supported PMS with extensive integrations, go with ASI. If managing vacation clubs or fractional ownership properties is your focus, consider TimeShareWare—but only if you can verify its performance firsthand.
Based on current review data, ASI PMS scores a remarkable 4.88 out of 5 for ease of use, with users highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward workflows. Customers praise its smooth onboarding, with a 4.69 out of 5 rating, and report that staff adoption is quick and simple.
TimeShareWare offers no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability. Its lack of recent user feedback suggests that it may not be as well-optimized for hotel staff needs, or at least that its user experience has not been recently validated.
Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS boasts 47 features, including multi-lingual support, centralized user management, online check-in, digital registration, guest CRM, channel management, revenue management, automated reminders, and mobile apps. These features support full-scale hotel operations and guest engagement.
TimeShareWare offers no publicly listed features or integrations, focusing instead on broad resort management functions. Its feature set remains unverified, and it lacks the depth and hotel-specific tools present in ASI.
Edge: ASI PMS.
Current reviews indicate ASI PMS’s customer support scores 4.73 out of 5, with users citing prompt resolution, professionalism, and helpful onboarding. Support responsiveness is generally praised, making it reliable for daily hotel operations.
TimeShareWare has no recent reviews or support ratings available, leaving its customer service quality uncertain. Without recent user feedback, it’s difficult to gauge whether it can meet hotel expectations for support and issue resolution.
Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI has 18 verified partners, including industry leaders like SiteMinder, Cendyn, Duetto, and RoomPriceGenie, supporting seamless connectivity for distribution, revenue, and CRM. These integrations help streamline operations across multiple platforms.
TimeShareWare offers only one verified integration with Whistle, a limited option for hotel integrations. Its narrower scope may restrict automation and data sharing capabilities for hotels requiring extensive third-party connections.
Edge: ASI PMS.
With 26 recent reviews, ASI PMS’s hotelier ratings are highly favorable, averaging 4.88/5 for ease of use, 4.73/5 for support, and a 97% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of various sizes and segments, primarily in North America and Asia Pacific, find it reliable and user-friendly.
TimeShareWare has no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property type preferences. Its lack of current feedback suggests it’s less proven in the hotel industry.
Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI PMS’s pricing starts at $300 per month, with no additional implementation or hidden fees, offering a transparent, flat-rate model. Pricing details for TimeShareWare are not publicly available, which makes direct comparison difficult.
Given the detailed pricing transparency and positive value ratings, ASI provides better clarity on investment.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or operates with very limited budget—since the system’s comprehensive nature may be more than needed.
Not ideal if your hotel is a standard, independent property or if you need detailed, hotel-specific features and recent user validation.
ASI PMS offers a comprehensive, hotel-centric system backed by extensive recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and a broad range of features. It’s proven in diverse markets, supports integrations, and boasts a user-friendly interface, making it the top choice for most hotels.
TimeShareWare is less validated in the hotel sector, with no recent reviews or detailed features listed. If you operate a timeshare or resort with multi-site needs, it might be suitable, but only after careful evaluation.
For most hoteliers seeking a reliable, feature-rich PMS with proven support, ASI PMS stands out as the clear leader. If your operation revolves around shared ownership or vacation club management, consider TimeShareWare—but verify its performance firsthand before making a decision.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASI PMS and SS&C TimeShareWare share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise |
Showing top differences. 35 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily... Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily operations. It's especially accommodating for those without prior hotel industry experience.
The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and r... The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and room assignment.
The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments w... The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments with high operational demand.
Where hoteliers push back
ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in respons... ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in response times. The professionalism and helpfulness in training are highlighted.
A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory man... A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory management, which could streamline broader business processes.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI PMS and SS&C TimeShareWare share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI PMS offers 18 verified integration partners, while SS&C TimeShareWare offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI PMS: No. SS&C TimeShareWare: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 77 and SS&C has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property