The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 28 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Travelclick shines .
Vertical Booking shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Call center functionality and Geotargeted pricing module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 28 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 28 |
After analyzing 28 verified reviews, Travelclick users most value its , while Vertical Booking users highlight customer service, channel management, seamless integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Travelclick |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate Shopping
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
User-Friendly
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking Engine
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Travelclick |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 11 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 5 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #10 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Travelclick |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #8 13 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #8 11 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #8 5 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #9 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Travelclick |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #4 17 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #8 6 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #6 1 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #4 4 reviews |
Choosing between Travelclick CRS and Vertical Booking hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational maturity, and geographic presence. Travelclick CRS, once a dominant player in hotel reservations, now suffers from a near-zero rating, indicating it’s largely out of the market and unsupported. Conversely, Vertical Booking boasts a strong reputation, with a 4.61-star rating from 27 recent reviews, signaling active development, customer satisfaction, and ongoing support.
Both products aim to streamline reservations and distribution, but their current market engagement and feature sets diverge significantly. Travelclick’s near-total absence of recent reviews and a 0/5 overall rating make it a risky choice, especially for hotels seeking reliable, modern systems. Will your hotel risk choosing an unsupported product, or will Vertical Booking’s proven track record serve your needs better?
Travelclick CRS was once a staple in the hotel reservation landscape but now is effectively obsolete, with no recent reviews or active support evident. Its zero-star rating and no updates in the last six months suggest it no longer maintains a modern, functional platform.
Vertical Booking, however, is actively used and reviewed, with a high overall rating of 4.61/5 based on 27 recent reviews. Hotels appreciate its features, ease of use, and dedicated support, making it a dependable choice for hotels looking to improve booking efficiencies and revenue management.
Your decision should reflect whether you need a current, supported platform—Vertical Booking—or are willing to risk operational issues with Travelclick’s outdated system.
Travelclick’s user experience ratings are nonexistent, and with no recent reviews or active user feedback, it’s reasonable to assume that usability is outdated or unsupported. Hotels that used Travelclick describe it as no longer fitting modern expectations.
Vertical Booking, with a 4.41/5 ease of use rating based on 27 recent reviews, is regarded as user-friendly by many users. Users praise its intuitive interface, straightforward management, and quick onboarding, which help staff adopt the system faster.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Travelclick offers no unique features listed today, reflecting its lack of active development or recent updates. In contrast, Vertical Booking provides eight distinct features including call center functionality, geotargeted pricing, support for weekly and monthly rates, dynamic pricing, availability management, cancellation policies, booking rules, and TMC management.
Vertical Booking’s features directly support revenue growth, rate management, and operational control, surpassing what Travelclick can currently deliver. For hotel teams seeking advanced, up-to-date booking and rate management tools, Vertical Booking clearly leads.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Travelclick offers no recent support ratings or testimonials, indicating it likely lacks active support resources. Hotels that previously used Travelclick report no recent engagement, raising concerns about ongoing support and issue resolution.
Vertical Booking, with a 4.5/5 customer support rating from recent reviews, maintains a reputation for quick, helpful responses. Hotels describe support as responsive and attentive, critical for smooth operations and resolving technical issues swiftly.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Travelclick has only one verified integration, with no active partner updates, suggesting limited current compatibility. Its sole integration, Yanolja Cloud Solution, is niche and does not reflect broad connectivity.
Vertical Booking, by contrast, boasts 69 verified partners, including industry-standard PMS and booking channels like Priority Software, WebRezPro, and RateBoard GmbH. Its extensive integration network simplifies management across multiple systems and channels, saving time and reducing errors.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Travelclick’s ratings are nonexistent, and no recent reviews or hotel segment data are available, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Its complete lack of recent activity indicates it’s not a preferred or supported choice now.
Vertical Booking, with 27 recent reviews, earns a 4.61/5 overall score. Hotels across various segments, including luxury, boutique, and resorts, praise its functionality, support, and ease of use. Recent reviews indicate strong satisfaction levels.
Edge: Vertical Booking.
Travelclick does not publicly list pricing, reflecting its outdated status and likely discontinued support. The absence of pricing information suggests it’s no longer a viable option.
Vertical Booking also does not share explicit pricing, but its value is reflected in its features and recent reviews praising its ROI and affordability. Its cost model appears competitive, especially given its active support and broad feature set.
Not ideal if:
Travelclick is not recommended for most hotels today.
Not ideal if:
Vertical Booking is suitable for hotels that want flexibility and ongoing support.
The core difference is that Vertical Booking is an actively supported, feature-rich system with a strong reputation, while Travelclick has become obsolete with no recent activity or reviews.
If your hotel values modern features, reliable support, and ongoing development, Vertical Booking is the clear choice. Travelclick should be avoided unless you are operating in a region or scenario where it still functions and your hotel’s operational needs are minimal.
For hotels aiming to maximize revenue, streamline operations, and future-proof their reservation platform, Vertical Booking offers measurable advantages. Travelclick is no longer a viable option for most modern hotels.
This comparison reflects current data—Vertical Booking’s active reviews, features, and support make it the safer, smarter investment for your hotel today.
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Travelclick |
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Travelclick CRS and Vertical Booking (CRS) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Travelclick |
|
|---|---|---|
| Availability Management | ||
| Call center functionality | ||
| Cancellation Policies | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Geotargeted pricing module | ||
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates |
What hoteliers love
While many users praise Vertical Booking's customer service for its responsiveness and effectiveness in resolving issues, some reviews indicate a need... While many users praise Vertical Booking's customer service for its responsiveness and effectiveness in resolving issues, some reviews indicate a need for improvement in terms of speed and consistency, particularly for the US market.
The channel management functionality of Vertical Booking received positive feedback for its ease of use and efficiency in handling multiple distributi... The channel management functionality of Vertical Booking received positive feedback for its ease of use and efficiency in handling multiple distribution channels. Users note that it streamlines the process and helps maintain up-to-date rates and availability across all connected channels.
Many users appreciate that Vertical Booking integrates seamlessly with other systems, allowing for smooth synchronization of rates, inventory, and res... Many users appreciate that Vertical Booking integrates seamlessly with other systems, allowing for smooth synchronization of rates, inventory, and reservations. This integration improves efficiency and saves time, especially for managing multiple platforms from a single interface.
Where hoteliers push back
Vertical Booking is frequently described as user-friendly and intuitive, making it easier for hotel staff to manage bookings and rates without extensi... Vertical Booking is frequently described as user-friendly and intuitive, making it easier for hotel staff to manage bookings and rates without extensive training. Despite this, a few users mention that certain features could be more intuitive and simplified.
The booking engine is generally appreciated for its functionality, but several reviews suggest that its interface could be more customizable and moder... The booking engine is generally appreciated for its functionality, but several reviews suggest that its interface could be more customizable and modernized. Users specifically mention the need for better user experiences on mobile devices and more flexibility in setting up discounts and promotions.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Travelclick CRS and Vertical Booking (CRS) share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Travelclick CRS offers 1 verified integration partners, while Vertical Booking (CRS) offers 69. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Vertical Booking (CRS) leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Travelclick CRS: No. Vertical Booking (CRS): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Travelclick has an HT Score of 0 and Vertical Booking has 29. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property