The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 733 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Actabl shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.7/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile access on any device.
UPRISER shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 733 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 733 | 0 |
After analyzing 733 verified reviews, Actabl users most value its task management and efficiency, guest request management, communication features, while UPRISER users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Task Management and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Request Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Communication Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Service Integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Personalization and Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Speed and Technical Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Access and Functionality
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Concierge Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 35 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 298 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 225 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 134 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 302 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #1 515 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #1 220 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 47 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 589 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 48 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #6 20 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #4 20 reviews | — |
Choosing between ALICE Guest Services by Actabl and Upriser - VEE hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and guest engagement goals. ALICE, with its extensive feature set and large user base, offers a well-rounded platform for managing guest requests and staff coordination. Upriser, being newer and less proven, focuses heavily on AI-driven guest interaction through voice and video. Which platform aligns better with your short-term priorities and long-term vision?
Both ALICE and Upriser aim to elevate guest experiences but do so with different approaches. ALICE is a mature, feature-rich platform that emphasizes task management, communication, and operational integration, making it ideal for hotels seeking a comprehensive concierge solution. Upriser, on the other hand, specializes in AI-powered voice and video interactions, targeted at properties wanting to leverage cutting-edge engagement tech. Do you prioritize managing requests efficiently or deploying advanced AI communication tools?
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable concierge platform with robust integrations, go with ALICE. It’s especially suitable for large hotels, resorts, and properties with complex operations, thanks to its 569 reviews and a 4.54/5 overall rating. For hotels that want to incorporate AI voice and video interactions to create personalized, immersive guest experiences, Upriser’s limited but focused offerings might appeal. However, given its lack of reviews and market presence, ALICE’s track record makes it the clear choice for most hoteliers.
ALICE has a high ease-of-use rating of 4.57/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users note that staff adoption is smooth, supported by positive feedback on its training and support, rated 4.41/5. In contrast, Upriser’s user experience remains unreviewed, and its newness suggests a steeper learning curve. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE features 23 unique functionalities, including a lost & found module, real-time task tracking, multi-property monitoring, and a comprehensive API. It also offers tools for service recovery, case management, and file libraries, making it highly adaptable. Upriser, with no exclusive features listed aside from basic AI voice and video, lacks the depth of ALICE’s toolkit. For feature richness and customization, ALICE clearly leads. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE’s support ratings are solid, with a 4.41/5 score and reviews mentioning prompt, helpful assistance. Hoteliers highlight the support team’s responsiveness and the ease of resolving issues promptly. Upriser’s support data is unavailable, and its limited review base suggests less proven customer service. Given ALICE’s established presence and support reputation, it offers more confidence. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE integrates with over 100 verified partners, including major hospitality systems like Oracle Hospitality, MSI Solutions, and Tripleseat. It also supports a range of modules such as vendor management, package tracking, and open API access. Upriser’s integration count is just one, with no extensive partner list available. For comprehensive connectivity, ALICE is the clear winner. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE’s reviews, with 569 total and recent feedback from 76 reviews, give it a strong 4.54/5 overall score. Hotels across various segments, especially resorts and independent properties, rate it highly—often citing its ease of use, reliability, and robust features. Upriser, with no reviews, cannot be meaningfully compared in ratings. For proven satisfaction, ALICE’s scores speak for themselves. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE’s base price is $1,000 per month, with no free tier or trial information provided. Upriser’s pricing is listed at $600 monthly, also without trial details. While ALICE’s higher fee reflects its extensive capabilities, the lack of trial options makes cost comparisons challenging. Based on features and reviews, ALICE’s investment appears justified for hotels seeking a dependable platform.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ALICE excels as a complete guest services platform that has established itself with a broad feature set, proven reliability, and extensive integrations. Its large review base and recent positive feedback make it the safer and more reliable choice for most hotels seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Upriser, as a newer offering with a focus on AI voice and video, might appeal to highly innovative properties but currently lacks the market presence and reviews to challenge ALICE’s dominance.
If your hotel needs a dependable, feature-rich concierge system, ALICE is the clear winner. Its proven track record and expansive capabilities make it an investment that will support your operations today and scale with your future growth.
Choose ALICE if you want a tested, well-supported platform with a high satisfaction rate. Opt for Upriser only if you are prepared to pioneer new AI guest engagement tools and accept the risks associated with a less established vendor.
Concierge Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ALICE Guest Services by Actabl and Upriser - VEE: (Video Engagement Engine) share 4 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| In app translation | ||
| Inspection | ||
| Lost & found module | ||
| Preventative maintenance module | ||
| Real time task tracking | ||
| Virtual logbook |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We do recommend ALICE to other hotels since it is a way to facilitate work with perfection. ALICE makes our work easier and more efficient in regard to following up and keeping tr..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
ALICE aids in organizing and prioritizing tasks effectively, which users find key to running a productive concierge operation. This feature significan... ALICE aids in organizing and prioritizing tasks effectively, which users find key to running a productive concierge operation. This feature significantly streamlines departmental workflows and maintains accountability, thus enhancing overall service efficiency at the hotel.
Reviewers praised ALICE for its ability to efficiently manage guest requests, ensuring timely fulfillment and reducing miscommunication. It logs reque... Reviewers praised ALICE for its ability to efficiently manage guest requests, ensuring timely fulfillment and reducing miscommunication. It logs requests, assists in routing them to the appropriate departments, and tracks them until completion, boosting both guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
ALICE enhances guest communication through multiple channels like SMS, email, and in-app messaging, offering seamless interaction with guests and betw... ALICE enhances guest communication through multiple channels like SMS, email, and in-app messaging, offering seamless interaction with guests and between departments. Users find the communication feature crucial for real-time updates, contributing to quicker resolution of guest requests and improved guest satisfaction.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate ALICE's personalization capabilities, allowing customization of guest services and interfaces, tailoring to specific needs. Yet, some... Users appreciate ALICE's personalization capabilities, allowing customization of guest services and interfaces, tailoring to specific needs. Yet, some reviews call for further flexibility in customizing reporting tools and more user-friendly dashboards for increased efficiency.
While many find ALICE reliable, some issues arise with speed during peak usage periods and occasional technical glitches. Suggested improvements inclu... While many find ALICE reliable, some issues arise with speed during peak usage periods and occasional technical glitches. Suggested improvements include optimizing speed and performance to ensure reliability, minimizing disruptions during high-traffic operations.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ALICE Guest Services by Actabl and Upriser - VEE: (Video Engagement Engine) share many core Concierge Software features, but each has unique capabilities. ALICE Guest Services by Actabl offers 100 verified integration partners, while Upriser - VEE: (Video Engagement Engine) offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ALICE Guest Services by Actabl leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ALICE Guest Services by Actabl: No. Upriser - VEE: (Video Engagement Engine): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Concierge Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Actabl has an HT Score of 100 and UPRISER has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor