The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 56 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
SHR Group shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Reporting Dashboard and Guest profiles.
Xn protel Systems shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 56 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 56 | 0 |
After analyzing 56 verified reviews, SHR Group users most value its personalized customer success support, user-friendly interface, integration with third-party systems, while Xn protel Systems users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Personalized Customer Success Support
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
AI-Driven Booking Engine
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Extensive Reporting Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Cloud-Based System
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 9 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 28 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 11 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #5 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 34 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 25 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 18 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #7 4 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #3 34 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 18 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #7 1 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #6 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) by SHR Group and XMS Enterprise CRS by Xn protel Systems hinges on your hotel's specific needs. Both products aim to streamline reservation management and improve distribution efficiency. However, SHR CRS is a widely adopted and highly rated solution with a robust feature set and recent positive reviews, making it the clear leader for hoteliers seeking proven performance.
If your hotel is considering a comprehensive platform with extensive integrations and a strong global presence, SHR CRS is likely your best fit. Conversely, XMS Enterprise CRS offers a centralized reservation approach but lacks recent reviews or detailed performance data, which weakens its case.
Are you ready to see which solution aligns better with your operational priorities?
Both SHR CRS and XMS CRS are designed to centralize booking and distribution, but their market presence and review data tell a different story. SHR CRS has a 4.77/5 overall rating based on 49 recent reviews, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, whereas XMS CRS has no ratings or reviews available.
SHR Group’s solution is used globally across multiple regions, with a focus on high-rated hotel segments like independent, boutique, and casino properties. XMS, however, provides limited publicly available data, making it harder to gauge its suitability.
If your hotel values a product backed by extensive user feedback and proven results, SHR CRS is the superior choice. Would you prefer a solution with a track record of customer satisfaction or one with scarce publicly available performance data?
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and smooth operations. SHR CRS scores a 4.61/5 for onboarding and a 4.61/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation. Reviewers note that SHR’s system is “pretty easy to use” and “more user-friendly than competitors like iHotelier,” despite some feedback about menu navigation needing improvement.
XMS CRS, however, offers no publicly available ratings or user reviews, making it impossible to assess its user interface or onboarding experience. Without recent feedback, it's difficult to determine if it matches SHR’s ease of use.
Edge: SHR Central Reservation System.
SHR CRS boasts 20 distinct features, including guest profiles, booking engine, channel management, metasearch connectivity, multi-property management, and revenue management controls — all designed to optimize your reservation process. These features are exclusive to SHR, giving your team more tools to control distribution, pricing, and customer data.
In contrast, XMS CRS lacks publicly listed features or detailed specifications, making it hard to compare. Its feature set remains unclear, but the absence of detailed features or recent reviews suggests SHR’s offering is more comprehensive.
Edge: SHR Central Reservation System.
Customer support ratings reveal SHR CRS’s strength: with a 4.76/5 score, users praise its “top-notch support” and “prompt response times.” Reviewers highlight SHR’s dedicated, personable service, which significantly eases daily operations.
XMS CRS provides no publicly shared support reviews or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate their support quality. The lack of recent reviews or user feedback diminishes confidence in their support effectiveness.
Edge: SHR Central Reservation System.
SHR CRS integrates with 81 verified partners, including major players like Profitroom, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and IDeaS, offering a broad ecosystem for your hotel. It also connects seamlessly with PMS, RMS, CRM, and payments, ensuring smooth data flow across your tech stack.
XMS CRS has only 26 verified integrations, with some notable partners like SEVENROOMS and Canary Technologies, but fewer overall. The broader network of integrations makes SHR more adaptable to your existing systems.
Edge: SHR Central Reservation System.
SHR CRS’s reviews consistently rate it highly, with an overall 4.77/5 rating from 49 reviews, most within the last six months. Hoteliers like Sundial Resorts highlight “spectacular growth” after implementing SHR, emphasizing its distribution and revenue management capabilities.
XMS CRS has no publicly available reviews, making it impossible to determine how well hoteliers rate it. With no recent feedback, SHR remains the clear frontrunner for user satisfaction.
Edge: SHR Central Reservation System.
Pricing information for both products is not publicly available, which is typical for enterprise solutions. Usually, these systems are customized based on hotel size and needs, so direct inquiries are necessary to determine exact costs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your decision should consider the value of proven performance and support, which SHR offers based on reviews and features.
Hotels that should consider SHR CRS:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that might consider XMS CRS:
Not ideal if:
SHR CRS stands out as the more reliable, well-rated option based on recent reviews, with 49 recent feedback entries and a 4.77/5 score. Its extensive feature set, global presence, and high customer satisfaction make it suitable for most mid to large hotels seeking a comprehensive reservation platform.
XMS CRS, however, provides a centralized booking approach but lacks recent reviews, detailed features, or clear support data. Without proven recent customer feedback, its value remains uncertain.
If you want a tested, well-supported solution with a strong user base, SHR CRS is the clear choice. Choose XMS only if your hotel already uses their ecosystem or if specific features align with your unique needs, and you are comfortable with less available feedback.
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) and XMS Enterprise CRS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking engine | ||
| Call center functionality | ||
| Channel management & OTA distribution | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| Reporting Dashboard |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
SHR's customer success team is often highlighted as outstanding, providing proactive and tailored support. This level of service helps in both everyda... SHR's customer success team is often highlighted as outstanding, providing proactive and tailored support. This level of service helps in both everyday inquiries and major projects, significantly easing the management of hotel operations.
SHR's systems, particularly CRS and CRO, are frequently described as user-friendly and easy to navigate. This ease of use contributes to efficient ope... SHR's systems, particularly CRS and CRO, are frequently described as user-friendly and easy to navigate. This ease of use contributes to efficient operations and quicker onboarding of new users.
The ability to seamlessly integrate with third-party systems like PMS and other hotel management tools is a strong point for SHR. Users find this inte... The ability to seamlessly integrate with third-party systems like PMS and other hotel management tools is a strong point for SHR. Users find this integral for smooth operations and efficient management.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews mention the need for more extensive and user-friendly reporting options within SHR's systems. This includes ad-hoc analysis capabiliti... Several reviews mention the need for more extensive and user-friendly reporting options within SHR's systems. This includes ad-hoc analysis capabilities and more detailed insight into key metrics.
A few users express a desire for a more fully cloud-based experience to minimize downtime during upgrades. This would align SHR with modern technology... A few users express a desire for a more fully cloud-based experience to minimize downtime during upgrades. This would align SHR with modern technology trends and enhance system availability.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) and XMS Enterprise CRS share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) offers 81 verified integration partners, while XMS Enterprise CRS offers 26. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
SHR Central Reservation System (CRS): No. XMS Enterprise CRS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. SHR Group has an HT Score of 49 and Xn protel Systems has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor