The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 544 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Actabl se distingue en matiere de interface usability & customization — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (5.0/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile access on any device.
Sweeply se distingue en ROI , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Custom Inspection Checklists.
Notes comparees basees sur 544 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
| Avis verifies | 516 | 28 |
Apres analyse de 544 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Actabl apprecient surtout interface usability & customization, optimisation des tâches ménagères, guest communication & experience, tandis que ceux de Sweeply mettent en avant efficiency in operations, customizability and ui, housekeeping management. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Interface Usability & Customization
▾
|
+
Efficiency in Operations
▾
|
|
+
Optimisation des tâches ménagères
▾
|
+
Customizability and UI
▾
|
|
+
Guest Communication & Experience
▾
|
+
Housekeeping Management
▾
|
|
+
Real-time Task Management
▾
|
+
Maintenance et communication
▾
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Guest Communication & Experience
▾
|
−
Reporting Features
▾
|
|
−
Integration with Existing Systems
▾
|
|
|
−
Retards d'accès mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Logiciel de ménage pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 24 avis | #6 13 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 241 avis | #14 13 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #1 119 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #1 92 avis | #10 2 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 232 avis | #12 9 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #1 255 avis | #13 10 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #1 188 avis | #15 6 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 33 avis | #7 13 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #1 417 avis | #20 1 avis |
| Europe ▾ | #6 43 avis | #8 26 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #2 9 avis | #9 1 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #5 8 avis | — |
When choosing housekeeping management software, your team needs a solution that enhances communication, improves efficiency, and integrates smoothly with existing systems. Both ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl and Sweeply Housekeeping aim to streamline your operations, but they approach this goal differently. Actabl’s solution is more comprehensive, with a deeper feature set and a larger user base, while Sweeply offers a straightforward, cost-effective alternative. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both products address core issues like task assignment, real-time updates, and staff communication. However, Actabl’s broader range of features and extensive integrations set it apart, especially for larger or more complex properties. Do you prioritize a feature-rich platform, or do you prefer a simpler, more affordable option?
ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl is designed for hotels that require advanced features, extensive integrations, and multi-property management. Its robust toolset, including modules for lost & found, preventative maintenance, and detailed analytics, caters to larger hotels or chains with complex operations. Conversely, Sweeply Housekeeping emphasizes simplicity, ease of use, and affordability, making it better suited for small to mid-sized hotels or properties seeking quick deployment.
While ALICE boasts a higher overall rating (4.7/5 from 413 reviews and a recent score of 116 reviews), Sweeply’s limited review count (27 reviews) and a lower overall rating (78.7/100 HT Score) make its data less current and less reliable. Do you need a platform with proven stability and a broad feature set, or is a lightweight solution enough?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive platform with extensive features—such as real-time task tracking, multi-property oversight, and advanced reporting—ALICE is the clear choice. Its large user base and high review volume (over 400 reviews, with recent feedback from 116) confirm its reliability and widespread adoption. For hotels that value detailed analytics, multilingual support, and integrations with PMS like Opera or Mews, ALICE delivers.
If your focus is on simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and rapid onboarding, Sweeply is ideal. Its core functionality covers essential housekeeping tasks, and its ease of use (average 4.85/5 rating) makes staff adoption straightforward. However, its limited integrations and feature depth mean it may not support complex operational needs. Are you looking for a full-featured system or a straightforward tool that gets the job done?
ALICE’s user interface is generally rated highly (4.71/5), but some users report interface clutter and occasional lag, especially during peak times. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.54/5, with some clients mentioning initial confusion during implementation. On the other hand, Sweeply scores slightly higher on ease of use (4.85/5) and onboarding (4.67/5), with reviews emphasizing its straightforward, intuitive design and quick staff adoption.
While ALICE’s extensive features can overwhelm new users, Sweeply’s simplicity allows for faster training and less resistance from staff. However, ALICE’s mobile accessibility is praised for real-time updates, which enhances operational flow. Edge: Sweeply.
ALICE offers 20 exclusive features, including real-time task tracking, a virtual logbook, preventative maintenance, and an open API, supporting larger hotels’ complex needs. Its comprehensive suite covers many operational areas beyond housekeeping, making it suitable for properties requiring detailed oversight and automation. Sweeply has only one unique feature: custom inspection checklists, with 13 features in total, mainly focusing on task assignment and basic communication.
If your hotel demands advanced analytics, multi-property management, and automation, ALICE’s feature set will serve you better. For straightforward housekeeping management without the need for extensive customization, Sweeply’s minimal but effective feature list may suffice. Which level of functionality aligns with your operational complexity?
ALICE’s support rating is 4.48/5, with users praising their responsiveness and helpfulness, though some mention long response times (up to two days). Clients note that ALICE’s onboarding can be improved, but overall, support is considered reliable for resolving issues. Conversely, Sweeply scores slightly higher at 4.7/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, helpful support and quick issue resolution, especially during initial setup.
Given the higher recent review count and support rating, ALICE’s support feels more proven at scale. However, Sweeply’s smaller team offers a more personalized experience. Edge: Sweeply.
ALICE boasts 100 verified integrations, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Cloudbeds, with 4 shared partners with Sweeply. These integrations support a wide range of operational needs, from property management to point-of-sale. Sweeply, with 11 verified partners, focuses mainly on integrations with Apaleo, Guesty, and Beds24, but fewer options mean less flexibility for complex systems.
If your property relies on multiple third-party integrations, ALICE’s extensive partner network offers more options and flexibility. For properties with simpler setup needs, Sweeply’s limited but targeted integrations might be enough. Which integration ecosystem do you need?
ALICE’s high review count (413 reviews) and recent feedback (116 reviews in the last 6 months) provide a more current picture of user satisfaction. Its overall rating of 4.7/5 underscores strong approval across hotel types, especially resorts and branded hotels. Sweeply’s 27 reviews, all from the last six months, give a snapshot of satisfaction but lack the breadth to be conclusive.
Larger properties and chains tend to rate ALICE higher, valuing its depth and robust support. Smaller hotels or independent properties appreciate Sweeply’s simplicity and affordability. Given the data recency and volume, ALICE’s reputation is more solidified. Edge: ALICE.
ALICE’s base price is $900 per month, with no free tier or trial information available. Its pricing reflects its extensive features and integrations, making it a substantial investment for larger hotels. Sweeply charges a lower base price of $200 per month, with no mention of additional fees, making it an attractive option for smaller hotels or properties on a tight budget.
While ALICE’s price might be justified for hotels with complex needs, smaller hotels will find Sweeply’s affordability appealing. Are your operational requirements or budget constraints the priority?
Hotels that benefit from ALICE’s extensive functionalities include:
Not ideal if:
If your hotel’s scale demands comprehensive operational oversight, ALICE will be a good fit.
Sweeply is suitable for:
Not ideal if:
If your hotel values straightforward operations and swift setup, Sweeply is the right choice.
ALICE offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, proven support, and a large user base. It’s best suited for larger hotels or chains with complex needs and the resources to manage implementation. Its high review count and recent feedback reinforce its reliability for demanding environments.
Sweeply provides a streamlined, easy-to-use housekeeping solution at a lower price point, ideal for small to mid-sized hotels. Its simplicity and quick onboarding enable rapid deployment, but it lacks the depth of features and integrations that larger properties may require.
Choose ALICE if your hotel needs advanced automation, detailed insights, and multi-property management. Opt for Sweeply if you seek a cost-effective, straightforward tool to improve daily housekeeping operations.
In summary, your decision hinges on your property’s size, operational complexity, and budget. Both products can improve housekeeping workflows, but the better fit depends on your specific needs and growth plans.
La tarification des Logiciel de ménage est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl et Sweeply Housekeeping partagent 13 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Inspection | ||
| Journal de bord virtuel | ||
| Listes de contrôle d'inspection personnalisées | ||
| Module de maintenance préventive | ||
| Module perdu & trouvé | ||
| Suivi des tâches en temps réel | ||
| Traduction dans l'application |
Affichage des principales differences. 9 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 2 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Sweeply is a game changer, Everyone is connected in one system now."
"We do recommend ALICE to other hotels since it is a way to facilitate work with perfection. ALICE makes our work easier and more efficient in regard to following up and keeping tr..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
The app is generally user-friendly, but reports of cluttered interfaces and limited customization options suggest room for improvement in streamlining... The app is generally user-friendly, but reports of cluttered interfaces and limited customization options suggest room for improvement in streamlining the user experience, particularly for new or less tech-savvy employees.
L'outil d'ALICE pour la gestion des tâches ménagères est salué pour son système d'attribution des tâches et de suivi de leur statut, mais certains uti... L'outil d'ALICE pour la gestion des tâches ménagères est salué pour son système d'attribution des tâches et de suivi de leur statut, mais certains utilisateurs soulignent la nécessité d'améliorer les fonctionnalités du module et la communication interdépartementale.
ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operati... ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operational transparency. However, SMS feature handling is critiqued for its lack of customization.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operati... ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operational transparency. However, SMS feature handling is critiqued for its lack of customization.
The integration capability of ALICE with other systems, such as Opera, is frequently mentioned. Users appreciate smooth data consistency which aids in... The integration capability of ALICE with other systems, such as Opera, is frequently mentioned. Users appreciate smooth data consistency which aids in operational flow, though some face challenges with older system compatibility.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Users praise Sweeply for transforming daily operations by reducing errors, improving communication, and offering consistency across locations. The too... Users praise Sweeply for transforming daily operations by reducing errors, improving communication, and offering consistency across locations. The tool helps streamline team tasks, prioritizes operations, and overall increases productivity, leading to better guest experiences.
While users find the UI intuitive and easy to use, many reviews suggest enhancements in visual customizations. Critics desire more flexibility in alte... While users find the UI intuitive and easy to use, many reviews suggest enhancements in visual customizations. Critics desire more flexibility in altering colors, themes, and reporting dashboards to better align the tool with brand aesthetics and operational needs.
Reviews highlight how Sweeply effectively manages housekeeping tasks, consolidates schedules, and assigns daily activities, resulting in meticulous ro... Reviews highlight how Sweeply effectively manages housekeeping tasks, consolidates schedules, and assigns daily activities, resulting in meticulous room management and cleanliness. This organization translates to noticeable improvements in guest experiences.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Many reviews point out that Sweeply's reporting features are basic and could benefit from additional analytics and filtering options. Users express a... Many reviews point out that Sweeply's reporting features are basic and could benefit from additional analytics and filtering options. Users express a need for more detailed and customizable reporting tools to gain better insights into performance metrics over time.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl et Sweeply Housekeeping partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Housekeeping Software de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl propose 100 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Sweeply Housekeeping en propose 11. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Sweeply Housekeeping est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.9/5 contre 4.7/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl : Non. Sweeply Housekeeping : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Housekeeping Software proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Actabl a un HT Score de 99 et Sweeply a 78. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits