The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Bokun se distingue .
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Bokun apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
| Bokun |
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Selecting a property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Bokun by Bokun and Mews PMS by Mews both aim to streamline operations but serve markedly different needs and hotel types. Which one aligns better with your specific requirements?
Bokun primarily targets tour operators, activity providers, and travel agencies, focusing on bookings and experience management. Mews, on the other hand, serves a broad spectrum of hotels—from boutique and mid-sized properties to large chains—offering comprehensive hotel management features. Are you more in need of a booking engine or a full-scale PMS?
Bokun is designed for managing tours, activities, and experience-based bookings, making it ideal for operators in the travel and recreation sectors. Mews offers an all-in-one cloud-based PMS that handles reservations, front desk operations, housekeeping, billing, and more, suited for hotels seeking operational automation.
While Bokun excels at product customization, inventory management, and integrations with travel channels, Mews provides extensive property management tools, over 1,000 integrations, and features like revenue management and guest CRM. Both solve distinct problems—so which core challenge is your hotel facing? Managing guest bookings or operational workflows?
If your hotel needs a robust system to handle day-to-day operations, revenue management, and guest engagement, go with Mews. It’s particularly suited for boutique hotels, chains, and properties looking for scalable, centralized management—evidenced by its 4.62/5 rating from 758 reviews, most recent reviews being only 6 months old.
If your hotel is a tour operator, activity provider, or experiences-focused business that requires booking customization, inventory control, and multi-channel distribution, Bokun could fit your needs. However, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, Bokun’s standing is weak—your team might be better served exploring other options.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use based on user reviews, with high marks for its modern, intuitive interface and smooth onboarding process. Hotels praise Mews’ mobile apps and automation features that reduce manual work, making staff adoption straightforward.
Bokun’s user experience is less clear, with no recent reviews to gauge its ease of use. Its interface is reportedly less refined, and support on implementation is described as lacking. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated channel management, and automated task management. It also offers tools for housekeeping, payments, and real-time reporting—features that streamline hotel operations.
Bokun provides no documented features beyond its core booking and inventory management for tours and activities. It does not offer comprehensive PMS features like billing, guest profiles, or automated workflows. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Users appreciate the instant support via 24/7 live chat and support portals, which helps maintain operational continuity.
Bokun’s support quality is unverified, with no recent reviews to assess. Given its weak overall rating, support likely lags behind Mews’s standards. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, POS systems, revenue tools, and more, creating a flexible tech environment. Bokun, however, has zero verified integration partners, limiting its connectivity options.
The extensive ecosystem of Mews allows hotels to customize and expand their tech stack easily—vital for modern operations. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s review count (758 reviews, 98 in the last 6 months) and high rating (4.62/5) clearly demonstrate superior market confidence. Hotels across segments—from boutique to large chains—consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Bokun has no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, suggesting it is not trusted or actively used by hotelliers today. For a reliable, proven PMS, Mews wins decisively. Edge: Mews.
Bokun’s pricing is not publicly available, but it is generally considered more affordable or even free for certain experience management features. Mews charges a base fee of $900/month, with no implementation or setup costs, making its pricing predictable and transparent.
Given the complexity of hotel operations, investing in a scalable PMS like Mews often yields better ROI despite higher upfront costs, especially considering its extensive capabilities.
Not ideal if you need comprehensive property management, billing, or guest engagement tools.
Not ideal if your primary focus is on experience-based activities rather than accommodations.
The core difference lies in scope. Mews offers a complete PMS tailored for hotel operations, while Bokun specializes in activity and experience bookings, mainly for tour operators.
If your hotel needs a full management system with automation, integrations, and guest management, Mews is the clear choice. Choose Bokun if your focus is solely on experience bookings and activities without the need for comprehensive hotel management features.
For hotels seeking reliability, scalability, and proven user satisfaction, Mews’s higher recent review count and ratings make it the stronger option. Bokun remains niche and underreviewed, making it less suitable for property management at this time.
In conclusion, if you want a trusted, well-supported platform ready to grow with your hotel, Mews is the recommended choice. For experience-based operators with minimal property management needs, Bokun might suffice, but better options are emerging.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
| Bokun |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Bokun et Mews PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Bokun et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Bokun propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 336. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Bokun : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Bokun a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits