The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Passepartout se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Passepartout mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. HOTELTIME PMS by HOTELTIME and Passepartout both aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in scope, features, and market presence. HOTELTIME offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform used across various hotel sizes and regions, while Passepartout appears more tailored to property managers with a focus on property-specific insights. Which platform aligns better with your hotel's needs?
HOTELTIME PMS is a fully cloud-based solution trusted by over 650 properties across 20+ countries, with a high HTR Score of 91.17 and 4.83/5 overall rating, supported by 433 recent reviews. It offers more than 50 exclusive features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, automation, and revenue management tools. Passepartout, with an overall rating of 0 and no recent reviews, lacks publicly available feature depth or market presence data, making it difficult to assess its suitability for hotel operations.
Both systems aim to improve operational workflows, but HOTELTIME’s extensive feature set directly addresses reservations, billing, housekeeping, and revenue management, essential for larger or multi-property hotels. Passepartout’s focus seems to be more on property-specific insights and tenant management, which may not cover the breadth of hotel operations. Are you seeking a proven, all-in-one PMS with broad integrations and global support?
If your hotel requires a robust, scalable platform with advanced automation, integrated POS, guest profiles, and multi-channel management, HOTELTIME is the clear choice. Its proven track record across diverse property types—luxury, resorts, city hotels—makes it ideal for hotels aiming for efficiency and guest experience enhancement.
Conversely, if your focus is on managing a single property or portfolio with a need for tenant or property-specific insights, and you prioritize AI-driven analytics over comprehensive hotel operations, Passepartout might appeal. However, the lack of detailed reviews or market footprint suggests HOTELTIME’s extensive adoption and proven capabilities make it the better all-around solution for hotels.
HOTELTIME’s interface receives a 4.66/5 ease-of-use rating, with many users praising its intuitive design and quick onboarding. Multiple reviews highlight that staff find the system straightforward after initial training, although some mention that the broad feature set can be complex initially.
Passepartout, with no available user ratings or reviews, offers no publicly verified comparison of usability. The absence of recent user feedback or case studies makes it risky to assume simplicity. Given HOTELTIME’s high review count and recent positive comments, edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME boasts over 50 exclusive features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audit, booking engine, channel manager, and revenue management modules. It also provides modules for spa and wellness, online check-in, mobile apps, and multi-currency support, making it a comprehensive hotel management solution.
Passepartout’s feature list is unavailable, and no unique functionalities are documented. Its AI-powered summaries and tenant management tools focus more on property-specific insights rather than the full suite of hotel operations. Edge: HOTELTIME for its extensive, hotel-specific feature set.
HOTELTIME’s support team maintains a 4.73/5 rating, with reviews praising their responsiveness, helpfulness, and detailed onboarding. Hoteliers report that support staff go beyond troubleshooting, assisting with customization and integration challenges.
Passepartout offers no publicly available customer support ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. Given HOTELTIME’s consistent positive feedback, edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME integrates with 58 verified partners, including Profitroom, Bookboost, STR, and Umi Digital, enabling seamless connectivity with booking engines, revenue tools, and third-party systems. This extensive partner network facilitates a flexible, interconnected hotel tech stack.
Passepartout has zero verified integrations publicly listed, limiting its compatibility scope. For hotels seeking broad, tested integration options, HOTELTIME’s ecosystem provides a significant advantage. Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME benefits from 27 recent reviews over the past 6 months, with a 93% likelihood of recommendation and high satisfaction among diverse hotel segments. Its users range from luxury to resorts, with property ratings averaging 4.82/5, and 4.9/5 for branded hotels.
Passepartout lacks recent reviews or rating data, making it impossible to assess peer satisfaction or property-specific ratings. Based on the available data, HOTELTIME’s high review count and recent positive feedback make it the preferred choice. Edge: HOTELTIME.
HOTELTIME charges a base price of $600 per month without a trial or freemium model. Pricing details for Passepartout are unavailable, suggesting it might be customized or less transparent.
Given HOTELTIME’s transparent pricing and established value proposition, it offers predictable costs aligned with its extensive features. Passepartout’s pricing remains unclear, making HOTELTIME the safer investment choice for budget planning.
Given the lack of recent reviews and detailed feature data, Passepartout is best suited for specialized property management rather than full hotel operations.
HotelTime PMS stands out as the more established, feature-rich, and widely adopted PMS solution tailored for hotels of all sizes. Its extensive integrations, high user ratings, and recent reviews confirm its strong market presence and reliability. It provides a comprehensive toolset that improves operational efficiency, supports automation, and enhances guest experience, making it suitable for most hotel types.
Passepartout offers some AI-powered insights for property management but falls short in publicly available features, reviews, and integrations. Its narrower focus on property-specific analytics may appeal to landlords or managers but does not match HOTELTIME’s breadth for hotel operations.
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable PMS with extensive features and support, HOTELTIME is the clear choice. Passepartout might serve niche property management needs but lacks the proven hotel-specific capabilities and market presence of HOTELTIME.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Passepartout | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Passepartout partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Passepartout partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Passepartout en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Passepartout : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et Passepartout a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits