The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Roombler se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Roombler mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Roombler hinges on your hotel's size, complexity, and operational needs. Both aim to streamline property management, but HotelTime offers extensive features suited for larger or more complex establishments, while Roombler caters specifically to small accommodations with a mobile-first approach. How do these differences align with your hotel’s current operations and growth plans?
HotelTime is a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS with a broad feature set, designed for properties of all sizes, including resorts and groups. Roombler, by contrast, is a lightweight app tailored for small lodgings and individual owners who prioritize simplicity and mobility. Do you need a full-scale platform or a straightforward app for managing a handful of rooms?
HotelTime PMS is built to serve larger hotels, resorts, and multi-property groups, boasting over 650 clients across 20+ countries. It integrates a wide range of modules, from revenue management to spa and POS, supporting complex operations and multi-department workflows. Roombler, however, is aimed at small-scale accommodation providers, offering essential booking and guest management through a mobile app, with no apparent extensive feature set or integrations.
HotelTime’s recent reviews highlight its high overall rating of 4.83/5, with 433 reviews, 27 of which are in the last six months, emphasizing ongoing satisfaction. Conversely, Roombler has no recent reviews or user feedback, making HotelTime’s positive reputation more current and reliable.
Are you seeking a robust PMS with proven, diverse functionality or a simple app that helps manage a handful of rooms from your phone?
If your hotel needs a full-featured platform that handles reservations, billing, housekeeping, revenue management, and integrations with third-party systems, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its extensive module count (over 50 unique features) and global presence make it suitable for medium to large properties seeking operational efficiency and detailed data insights.
If your property is small, perhaps a boutique or vacation rental, and you prefer managing your business from your iPhone or iPad without complex setup, then Roombler aligns better with your needs. Its focus on simplicity and mobility allows owners to oversee bookings and guest stays on the go, without the burden of managing a large system.
In summary, HotelTime suits properties aiming for comprehensive control, while Roombler appeals to small operators seeking quick, mobile management.
HotelTime scores a strong 4.66/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users mention that once familiar, staff can navigate the system efficiently, although initial setup can be complex due to its extensive modules.
Roombler has no publicly available ease-of-use ratings or recent reviews, but its app-based approach suggests a focus on simplicity. However, the lack of recent user feedback makes it hard to assess how smoothly new users can adopt the platform.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers over 50 exclusive features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, digital registration, automated night audit, revenue management, and multi-currency support. Its modules extend to spa management, group bookings, online check-in, and integrated ID scanning, catering to diverse operational requirements.
Roombler provides basic booking, stay management, and guest communication functionalities but lacks the extensive feature set found in HotelTime. It does not advertise more advanced modules like revenue management or integrations with third-party systems.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support scores a 4.73/5, with reviews commending its responsiveness, knowledgeable staff, and thorough onboarding. Users often mention that support staff are quick to help resolve issues and assist with system customization, critical for larger hotels with complex setups.
Roombler has no recent reviews or publicly available support ratings, making it difficult to assess its customer service quality. Given its small team size and limited user base, it likely offers basic support, but with less proven responsiveness.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified partners, including Profitroom, Bookboost, STR, and Net Affinity, enabling seamless connection with booking engines, revenue tools, and channel managers. This extensive ecosystem allows properties to build a versatile, interconnected tech stack.
Roombler has no publicly listed integrations or verified partners, suggesting a more closed, standalone platform. This limits its ability to connect with other hotel systems or third-party services.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s recent reviews and high overall scores (4.83/5) indicate strong satisfaction among a diverse range of properties, from boutique hotels to resorts. Larger hotels and chains appreciate its scalability and extensive functionality, with comments highlighting its role in automation and operational improvements.
Roombler lacks recent reviews and user feedback, making it impossible to gauge current hotel satisfaction or performance. Its niche focus on small operators suggests it may be valued by individual owners, but data is insufficient to compare.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no indication of trial periods or additional implementation fees. Its cost reflects its extensive feature set and enterprise-level capabilities.
Roombler’s pricing is not publicly available, but as an app designed for small operators, it likely offers a lower or flexible fee structure. However, the absence of detailed pricing and features limits direct comparison.
Not ideal if your property is small, with minimal staff or simple operations, and you prefer managing via mobile or basic tools.
Not ideal if your hotel is larger, has multiple departments, or needs detailed reporting and automation.
HotelTime PMS is a comprehensive platform suited for hotels of all sizes, especially those seeking detailed control, extensive features, and broad integrations. Its high review count, recent feedback, and global presence make it a proven choice for established properties aiming to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences.
Roombler is a simple, mobile-first app designed for small accommodation providers wanting quick, flexible management from their phones. With limited features and no recent reviews, it’s ideal for individual owners or very small hotels with basic needs.
For properties looking for a full-featured, scalable PMS, HotelTime clearly leads. If your setup is minimal and you prioritize mobility, Roombler may be sufficient, but HotelTime’s proven performance and recent positive feedback make it the safer, more robust choice.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Roombler
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Roombler partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Roombler
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Roombler
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Roombler
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Roombler partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Roombler en propose 0. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Roombler : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et Roombler a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits