The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Winner Hotel Software se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de Winner Hotel Software mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can define your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and overall profitability. HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) both aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in user feedback, feature depth, and global reach. For hoteliers weighing their options, understanding how each performs in real-world settings is critical—so which one truly meets your hotel’s needs?
HotelTime PMS and Winner PMS are designed to automate and unify hotel operations, from reservations to billing. HotelTime’s strength lies in its comprehensive feature set, extensive regional presence, and high user ratings, whereas Winner PMS offers a simpler, more intuitive interface with fewer reported issues. In terms of recent reviews, HotelTime’s 27 reviews in the last six months reinforce its active user base and current relevance, compared to Winner PMS’s lack of recent feedback.
Both systems handle core functions like reservations, check-ins, housekeeping, and billing, but HotelTime stands out with over 50 unique features—including integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audit, and multi-currency support. Winner PMS’s limited features suggest it may be better suited to properties seeking simplicity over extensive customization. Are you looking for a feature-rich platform or a straightforward solution?
If your hotel needs a scalable, full-service PMS capable of managing complex operations—such as group bookings, spa services, and multi-property management—HotelTime is the clear choice. Its customer base spans luxury resorts, city center hotels, and boutique properties, demonstrating versatility and depth. Conversely, if your property is smaller or prioritizes ease of use without a heavy feature set, Winner PMS’s intuitive interface and strong onboarding support might be advantageous.
HotelTime’s robust integration options and regional presence in Europe, Middle East, and Asia Pacific make it ideal for hotels seeking extensive customization and international reach. Winner PMS’s simplicity and focus on core functions suit boutique hotels or properties with straightforward operational requirements. Which features matter most for your property’s growth?
HotelTime PMS boasts a high ease-of-use rating at 4.66 out of 5, with positive reviews highlighting its user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and helpful support team. Users describe HotelTime as intuitive once familiar, with many appreciating its mobile app and real-time reporting. However, some mention the initial learning curve due to the system’s extensive modules.
Winner PMS lacks detailed ease-of-use ratings and recent reviews, but industry feedback emphasizes its simplicity and quick training process, especially appreciated by smaller teams. Its interface is described as straightforward, reducing the time needed to get staff up to speed. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers over 50 exclusive features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, custom rates, automation tools, and an extensive set of modules like housekeeping, group management, and digital registration. Its features support complex revenue management and multi-channel distribution, making it suitable for large or multi-faceted properties.
Winner PMS’s features are less detailed in available data, focusing on core reservation and housekeeping functions without the extensive add-ons. HotelTime’s feature count and versatility give it a clear advantage. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support rating of 4.73 out of 5 is reinforced by recent reviews praising its responsive, knowledgeable team and comprehensive onboarding process. Customers frequently mention fast responses, helpful training, and ongoing assistance, essential for complex setups.
Winner PMS’s support details are limited, but the lack of recent reviews and detailed feedback makes it difficult to assess. Based on current data, HotelTime’s support is more actively rated and reviewed, providing greater confidence. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 58 verified integrations, including third-party partners like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, offering extensive compatibility with booking engines, analytics, and revenue tools. Its integrations cover a broad range of hotel operations, enabling flexible tech stacks.
Winner PMS has a single verified partner—Mews—limiting its integration scope significantly. For properties aiming to connect multiple systems effortlessly, HotelTime’s broad partner network is a decisive advantage. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83/5 and NPS score of 9.26/10 are based on 433 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability, feature richness, and excellent support. Properties across various segments, especially resorts and city hotels, consistently praise its performance.
Winner PMS lacks recent reviews and publicly available star ratings, making it difficult to gauge user satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of HotelTime’s reviews, hoteliers rate it significantly higher. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime charges a flat monthly fee of $600 without a trial or freemium option, offering transparency for established budgets. Pricing for Winner PMS is not publicly available, which may suggest customized or variable costs.
Without official pricing details for Winner PMS, HotelTime’s straightforward fee structure offers predictability and value for money. The lack of transparent pricing for Winner PMS might be a barrier for some hotels planning budgets. Edge: HotelTime.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, needs only basic reservation functions, or prefers a minimalistic, easy-to-use platform.
Not ideal if your hotel needs sophisticated modules, multi-property management, or advanced automation.
HotelTime PMS stands out with its extensive feature set, regional presence, and high user ratings, making it suitable for larger, complex properties aiming for automation and operational control. Its active community of over 650 users worldwide and recent reviews affirm its relevance and ongoing support, especially in Europe and Asia Pacific.
Winner PMS offers an easier, more straightforward user experience, ideal for small hotels or boutique properties prioritizing quick setup and simple operations. Its lesser integration options and limited recent feedback make it less suitable for properties with complex needs or regional expansion ambitions.
In conclusion, if your hotel demands a feature-rich, highly integrated, and well-supported PMS, HotelTime is the clear choice. If simplicity and ease of adoption are your priorities, and your operations are straightforward, Winner PMS could meet your needs—though it lacks the depth and recent validation of HotelTime.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) en propose 1. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 91 et Winner Hotel Software a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits