The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Luopan se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise.
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avis verifies | 0 | 887 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Luopan apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 329 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | — | #1 397 avis |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | — | #3 45 avis |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | — | #3 49 avis |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | — | #5 220 avis |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | — | #2 170 avis |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | — | #1 130 avis |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | — | #8 106 avis |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 avis |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | — | #10 17 avis |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | — | #28 8 avis |
Choosing between Luopan Arcas PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs, size, and growth ambitions. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. While Luopan offers core PMS functionalities, Mews emphasizes automation, integrations, and a user-friendly interface. Are you prioritizing a mature, highly-rated platform with extensive integrations, or a flexible, unified system tailored for multi-property growth?
Luopan Arcas PMS, developed by Luopan in Beijing, aims to centralize hotel operations with a comprehensive property management approach. Its core features include reservations, front desk, night audit, and guest profiles, bundled into a single platform designed for medium to large hotels and hotel groups. Conversely, Mews PMS, headquartered in Amsterdam, boasts a broad, cloud-native ecosystem with over 335 verified integrations, serving hotel segments from boutique to large chains globally.
Where Luopan has a limited review presence, with no recent reviews or ratings, Mews benefits from over 759 reviews, with the latest in the past six months, indicating active user engagement. Mews’s recent reviews highlight a 4.62/5 overall rating, with ease of use and support receiving consistently high marks. The core distinction is that Mews has a proven track record of supporting scalability through automation, third-party integrations, and a modern interface, while Luopan’s user feedback remains unavailable or outdated. Would you prefer a platform with a substantial, recent user base or one still establishing its reputation?
If your hotel needs a centralized, multi-property management system with core PMS features and a focus on traditional workflows, Luopan could be suitable—though it lacks recent user reviews or ratings to validate performance. For hotels seeking a scalable, highly-integrated system that supports automation, guest engagement, and rapid growth, Mews is the clear choice. Its extensive third-party integrations and positive recent reviews make it more adaptable for modern hospitality demands.
For boutique hotels or properties prioritizing ease and innovation, Mews’s user interface and support network are highly valued, especially with a 4.27/5 customer support rating. Conversely, if you’re a larger hotel group looking for a consolidated, yet less tested platform with core PMS functionalities, Luopan might appeal—though the absence of recent reviews raises questions about ongoing support and evolution.
Mews excels here, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating, supported by recent reviews praising its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Users frequently mention how fast their teams learn the system, with many noting that Mews is built for simplicity and efficiency. Luopan, on the other hand, offers no recent ratings or reviews, making it difficult to assess its usability or onboarding experience.
Based on available data, Mews’s onboarding scores of 4.39/5 and detailed user praise place it ahead for staff adoption and daily operation. Edge: Mews.
Mews outshines with 59 unique features exclusive to its platform, including revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, digital registration, online check-in/out, task management, and mobile apps. These features are designed to support a fully digital, guest-centric experience and operational automation. Luopan offers core PMS functionalities but lacks the extensive feature set and open API capabilities seen in Mews.
Furthermore, Mews’s features cater to modern hospitality needs, including contactless check-in, guest messaging, integrated POS, and sophisticated reporting—details that are absent or unlisted for Luopan. The clear edge: Mews.
Mews’s support reputation is strong, with a 4.27/5 customer support rating and many recent reviews praising their responsiveness and helpfulness during onboarding and ongoing use. Users mention that support is prompt, with some noting quick bug resolution and proactive communication. Luopan, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on support quality, leaving its support level uncertain.
Given Mews’s active support team and recent positive feedback, the edge goes to Mews.
Mews boasts 335 verified integrations, including over 1,000 in its Marketplace, linking to revenue management, POS, channel managers, ID scanners, marketing, and more. It supports seamless connectivity with a broad ecosystem of third-party tools, enabling flexible customization. Luopan, by contrast, has no verified partners listed, indicating a limited or unverified integration network.
The extensive integrations and API openness give Mews a significant advantage for hotels seeking a versatile, connected tech environment. Edge: Mews.
While Luopan has no recent reviews or ratings, Mews’s latest data shows a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 759 reviews, with recent feedback reinforcing its ease of use and support. Mews’s favorable reviews span boutique, independent, and branded properties, often highlighting its simplicity and automation benefits.
Without recent Luopan user data, the explicit rating advantage is clear—Mews’s active user base and high ratings tilt the balance firmly in its favor. Edge: Mews.
Luopan does not publicly list its pricing or offer trial information, which complicates direct comparison. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no mention of implementation or setup costs, but exact pricing can vary based on hotel size and needs.
In general, Mews’s transparent pricing model allows for clearer budgeting, while Luopan’s lack of published prices suggests a potential for custom quotes, often typical in enterprise solutions. Budget considerations favor Mews, given its straightforward model.
Luopan offers a traditional, core PMS experience with basic functionalities suited to established hotel management but lacks recent validation or broad integrations. Mews provides a modern, cloud-based ecosystem with extensive features, integrations, and a strong recent user review base, emphasizing automation and scalability.
Opt for Luopan if your hotel requires a straightforward, centralized PMS in a large property or group setting and you prefer a system with a long-standing reputation, even if unverified by recent user feedback. Its core functionalities may suffice for operations focused on reservations, night audit, and basic guest profiles.
Choose Mews if your hotel seeks a flexible, automation-driven platform capable of supporting growth across multiple locations. Its high user ratings, extensive integrations, and modern features make it ideal for properties aiming to elevate guest experiences and streamline operations.
Mews is the stronger platform, given its active, recent reviews, high overall ratings, and broad feature set. The platform's focus on automation, integrations, and user experience positions it as the better choice for most hotels looking to modernize and scale.
If your hotel values proven engagement and a widely adopted system, Mews is the clear leader. For those needing a simpler, traditional PMS with a focus on core functionalities, Luopan may suffice—though the lack of recent validation suggests caution. Overall, Mews’s proven track record and active user base make it the recommended choice for today’s competitive hospitality landscape.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
Voici les fonctionnalites configurees par chaque fournisseur, organisees par groupe de fonctionnalites — les memes donnees que dans le tableau de bord du fournisseur. Developpez un groupe pour comparer les fonctionnalites cote a cote.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Comptabilité et Finance
|
|
|
| Facturation directe | ||
| Rapports RevPaR et ADR | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
|
▾
Marketing et commerce électronique
|
|
|
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Marketing par courriel natif | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Chèques cadeaux | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration et configuration
|
|
|
| Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Basé sur le cloud | ||
| Sur place | ||
|
▾
Gestion de la clientèle
|
|
|
| Communication invité (messagerie SMS) | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Réception
|
|
|
| Notes et tâches relatives aux appareils mobiles (Voix-à-Texte) | ||
| Application mobile | ||
| Audit de nuit automatisé | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Profils d'invités | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Gestion des groupes
|
|
|
| Fonctionnalité de groupe | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Expérience client
|
|
|
| Scanner d'identité et de passeport intégré | ||
| Inscription numérique | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Entretien ménager
|
|
|
| Module d'entretien ménager | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Paiements
|
|
|
| Terminal de paiement et lecteur de carte intégrés | ||
| Facturation directe | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Gestion des réservations
|
|
|
| Rapports RevPaR et ADR | ||
| Chèques cadeaux | ||
| Gestionnaire de canaux | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
La gestion des recettes
|
|
|
| Rapports RevPaR et ADR | ||
| Tarifs personnalisés | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes et conformité
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Assistance & Formation
|
|
|
| Assistance en ligne 24h/24 et 7j/7 | ||
|
▾
nourriture et boissons
|
|
|
| Épopée | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Module Spa & Bien-être |
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Luopan Arcas PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Luopan Arcas PMS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Luopan Arcas PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Luopan a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété