Luopan Arcas PMS vs. Mews PMS: Lequel vous convient le mieux ?

Mis a jour le July 12, 2026  ·  887 avis verifies analyses

TLDR

Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :

Luopan se distingue , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme On premise.

Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.

Voir l'analyse complete ci-dessous ↓

Comment Luopan Arcas PMS se compare-t-il a Mews PMS ?

Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.

HTScore
0
100
Probabilite de recommandation
0%
93%
Facilite d'utilisation
0.0/5
4.7/5
Support client
0.0/5
4.3/5
Rapport qualite-prix
0.0/5
4.4/5
Prix de depart Contact sales From $900/mo
Avis verifies 0 887

Quels sont les avantages et inconvenients de Luopan Arcas PMS vs Mews PMS ?

Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Luopan apprecient surtout , tandis que ceux de Mews mettent en avant ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.

Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Avantages
+ Ease of Use
+ Automation and Integrations
+ Customizability and Flexibility
+ Intégration et soutien
Inconvenients
Billing and Invoicing
Rapports et analyses
Multi-Property Management

Luopan vs Mews : Classement par segment hotelier

Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.

Par taille d'hotel

Segment Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Petit (10-24 chambres) #3 329 avis
Moyen (25-74 chambres) #1 397 avis
Grand (75-199 chambres) #3 45 avis
Tres grand (200+ chambres) #3 49 avis

Par type d'etablissement

Segment Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Boutique #1 483 avis
Luxe #5 220 avis
Enseigne / Chaine #2 170 avis
Sejour prolonge #1 130 avis

Par region

Segment Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Amerique du Nord #8 106 avis
Europe #1 660 avis
Asie-Pacifique #10 17 avis
Moyen-Orient #28 8 avis

The Decision

Choosing between Luopan Arcas PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs, size, and growth ambitions. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. While Luopan offers core PMS functionalities, Mews emphasizes automation, integrations, and a user-friendly interface. Are you prioritizing a mature, highly-rated platform with extensive integrations, or a flexible, unified system tailored for multi-property growth?

Is Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS Better for Hotels?

Luopan Arcas PMS, developed by Luopan in Beijing, aims to centralize hotel operations with a comprehensive property management approach. Its core features include reservations, front desk, night audit, and guest profiles, bundled into a single platform designed for medium to large hotels and hotel groups. Conversely, Mews PMS, headquartered in Amsterdam, boasts a broad, cloud-native ecosystem with over 335 verified integrations, serving hotel segments from boutique to large chains globally.

Where Luopan has a limited review presence, with no recent reviews or ratings, Mews benefits from over 759 reviews, with the latest in the past six months, indicating active user engagement. Mews’s recent reviews highlight a 4.62/5 overall rating, with ease of use and support receiving consistently high marks. The core distinction is that Mews has a proven track record of supporting scalability through automation, third-party integrations, and a modern interface, while Luopan’s user feedback remains unavailable or outdated. Would you prefer a platform with a substantial, recent user base or one still establishing its reputation?

Luopan Arcas PMS vs Mews PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a centralized, multi-property management system with core PMS features and a focus on traditional workflows, Luopan could be suitable—though it lacks recent user reviews or ratings to validate performance. For hotels seeking a scalable, highly-integrated system that supports automation, guest engagement, and rapid growth, Mews is the clear choice. Its extensive third-party integrations and positive recent reviews make it more adaptable for modern hospitality demands.

For boutique hotels or properties prioritizing ease and innovation, Mews’s user interface and support network are highly valued, especially with a 4.27/5 customer support rating. Conversely, if you’re a larger hotel group looking for a consolidated, yet less tested platform with core PMS functionalities, Luopan might appeal—though the absence of recent reviews raises questions about ongoing support and evolution.

Is Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS Easier to Use?

Mews excels here, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating, supported by recent reviews praising its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Users frequently mention how fast their teams learn the system, with many noting that Mews is built for simplicity and efficiency. Luopan, on the other hand, offers no recent ratings or reviews, making it difficult to assess its usability or onboarding experience.

Based on available data, Mews’s onboarding scores of 4.39/5 and detailed user praise place it ahead for staff adoption and daily operation. Edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Features: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

Mews outshines with 59 unique features exclusive to its platform, including revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, digital registration, online check-in/out, task management, and mobile apps. These features are designed to support a fully digital, guest-centric experience and operational automation. Luopan offers core PMS functionalities but lacks the extensive feature set and open API capabilities seen in Mews.

Furthermore, Mews’s features cater to modern hospitality needs, including contactless check-in, guest messaging, integrated POS, and sophisticated reporting—details that are absent or unlisted for Luopan. The clear edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

Mews’s support reputation is strong, with a 4.27/5 customer support rating and many recent reviews praising their responsiveness and helpfulness during onboarding and ongoing use. Users mention that support is prompt, with some noting quick bug resolution and proactive communication. Luopan, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on support quality, leaving its support level uncertain.

Given Mews’s active support team and recent positive feedback, the edge goes to Mews.

Which Has More Integrations: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

Mews boasts 335 verified integrations, including over 1,000 in its Marketplace, linking to revenue management, POS, channel managers, ID scanners, marketing, and more. It supports seamless connectivity with a broad ecosystem of third-party tools, enabling flexible customization. Luopan, by contrast, has no verified partners listed, indicating a limited or unverified integration network.

The extensive integrations and API openness give Mews a significant advantage for hotels seeking a versatile, connected tech environment. Edge: Mews.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Luopan Arcas PMS or Mews PMS?

While Luopan has no recent reviews or ratings, Mews’s latest data shows a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 759 reviews, with recent feedback reinforcing its ease of use and support. Mews’s favorable reviews span boutique, independent, and branded properties, often highlighting its simplicity and automation benefits.

Without recent Luopan user data, the explicit rating advantage is clear—Mews’s active user base and high ratings tilt the balance firmly in its favor. Edge: Mews.

How Much Do Luopan Arcas PMS and Mews PMS Cost?

Luopan does not publicly list its pricing or offer trial information, which complicates direct comparison. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no mention of implementation or setup costs, but exact pricing can vary based on hotel size and needs.

In general, Mews’s transparent pricing model allows for clearer budgeting, while Luopan’s lack of published prices suggests a potential for custom quotes, often typical in enterprise solutions. Budget considerations favor Mews, given its straightforward model.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Luopan Arcas PMS?

  • Hotels that prioritize core property management functionalities and have a preference for established, possibly multi-property management.
  • Hotel groups seeking a centralized system designed for medium to large properties with standardized workflows.
  • Teams that prefer a system with a focus on reservations, night audit, and basic guest profiles.
  • Not ideal if: you're looking for a modern, automation-heavy platform or prioritize quick onboarding and integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Mews PMS?

  • Boutique, independent, or chain hotels aiming for a modern, flexible, and scalable platform.
  • Properties that value automation, guest engagement tools, and extensive third-party integrations.
  • Teams seeking fast onboarding, ongoing support, and a platform adaptable to evolving hospitality trends.
  • Not ideal if: your hotel prefers a legacy system with limited integrations or is very small with minimal technical needs.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Core Difference in 2 Sentences

Luopan offers a traditional, core PMS experience with basic functionalities suited to established hotel management but lacks recent validation or broad integrations. Mews provides a modern, cloud-based ecosystem with extensive features, integrations, and a strong recent user review base, emphasizing automation and scalability.

When to Choose Luopan

Opt for Luopan if your hotel requires a straightforward, centralized PMS in a large property or group setting and you prefer a system with a long-standing reputation, even if unverified by recent user feedback. Its core functionalities may suffice for operations focused on reservations, night audit, and basic guest profiles.

When to Choose Mews

Choose Mews if your hotel seeks a flexible, automation-driven platform capable of supporting growth across multiple locations. Its high user ratings, extensive integrations, and modern features make it ideal for properties aiming to elevate guest experiences and streamline operations.

Our Verdict

Mews is the stronger platform, given its active, recent reviews, high overall ratings, and broad feature set. The platform's focus on automation, integrations, and user experience positions it as the better choice for most hotels looking to modernize and scale.

If your hotel values proven engagement and a widely adopted system, Mews is the clear leader. For those needing a simpler, traditional PMS with a focus on core functionalities, Luopan may suffice—though the lack of recent validation suggests caution. Overall, Mews’s proven track record and active user base make it the recommended choice for today’s competitive hospitality landscape.

Combien coutent Luopan Arcas PMS et Mews PMS ?

La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.

Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Starting Price From $900/mo

Comparaison des fonctionnalites : Luopan Arcas PMS vs Mews PMS

Voici les fonctionnalites configurees par chaque fournisseur, organisees par groupe de fonctionnalites — les memes donnees que dans le tableau de bord du fournisseur. Developpez un groupe pour comparer les fonctionnalites cote a cote.

Fonctionnalite Luopan Luopan Mews Mews
Comptabilité et Finance
100%
100%
Facturation directe
Rapports RevPaR et ADR
Multi-devise
Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc)
Audit de nuit automatisé
Marketing et commerce électronique
100%
100%
Communication invité (messagerie SMS)
Marketing par courriel natif
Profils d'invités
CRM invité
Chèques cadeaux
Gestionnaire de canaux
Moteur de réservation
Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc)
Administration et configuration
100%
75%
Gestion centralisée des utilisateurs et des rôles
Multilingue
Basé sur le cloud
Sur place
Gestion de la clientèle
75%
100%
Communication invité (messagerie SMS)
Profils d'invités
Centralized Messaging
Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc)
Réception
75%
92%
Notes et tâches relatives aux appareils mobiles (Voix-à-Texte)
Application mobile
Audit de nuit automatisé
Vue Calendrier
Multilingue
Task Management
Automated reminders
Profils d'invités
Tablet/Kiosk Check-in
Payment Requests
Centralized Messaging
Automated Space Optimization
Gestion des groupes
100%
100%
Fonctionnalité de groupe
Automated Space Optimization
Expérience client
56%
100%
Scanner d'identité et de passeport intégré
Inscription numérique
Guest App
Online Check-in
Online Checkout
Guest Messaging
Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc)
ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill
Lobby Kiosk
Entretien ménager
88%
100%
Module d'entretien ménager
Housekeeping Mobile App
Real-Time Status Updates
Automated Assignments
Real Time Reporting
Shift Planning
Employee Messaging
Online Checkout
Paiements
100%
100%
Terminal de paiement et lecteur de carte intégrés
Facturation directe
Multi-devise
Traitement des paiements
Payment Requests
Gestion des réservations
100%
100%
Rapports RevPaR et ADR
Chèques cadeaux
Gestionnaire de canaux
CRS intégré
Drag-n-Drop Tapechart
Rate Management
Automated Space Optimization
Rules Based Room Assignments
Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc)
La gestion des recettes
100%
100%
Rapports RevPaR et ADR
Tarifs personnalisés
Suivi des revenus annexes
Module de gestion des revenus
Base Pricing
Taxes et conformité
50%
100%
PCI Compliant
GDPR Compliant
SOC2 Complaint
Tax Configuration
Assistance & Formation
0%
100%
Assistance en ligne 24h/24 et 7j/7
nourriture et boissons
100%
100%
Épopée
Spa
100%
0%
Module Spa & Bien-être

Resultats concrets : Luopan vs Mews par objectif commercial

Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.

Augmenter les revenus et reduire les couts
Luopan Luopan

Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.

Mews Episode Tbilisi Petit
+ Zero connection fee costs
+ 11.9% booking engine conversion rate (average for independent hotels is 3.3%)
+ 9% higher ADR for direct bookings compared to OTAs

"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."

Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Co-Founder & CEO, Episode Hotels
Augmenter l'efficacite operationnelle
Luopan Luopan

Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.

Mews Aplend Apartments Moyen
+ Five properties went live in the space of two weeks
+ One week from welcome call to go live date for several resorts
+ 80% faster to train new staff, cutting time from five working days to just one

"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."

Matej Matejka
Matej Matejka
Owner, Aplend Group
Ameliorer l'experience client
Luopan Luopan

Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.

Mews Leven Manchester Petit
+ 33% of guests use online check-in
+ 9% higher ADR for guests who use online check-in
+ Up to an hour saved per day for the front desk team

"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."

Kris Doyle
Kris Doyle
General Manager, Leven Manchester

Luopan vs Mews : Le verdict final

Luopan
Luopan
0.0/5 sur 0 avis

Fonctionnalites uniques

Sur place Module Spa & Bien-être
0.0/5 facilite d'utilisation 0.0/5 support 0 integrations
Voir le profil
Mews
Mews
4.7/5 sur 887 avis

Ce que les hoteliers apprecient

Ease of Use 89% positif

Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.

Automation and Integrations 69% positif

Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.

Customizability and Flexibility 69% positif

Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.

Les points de friction pour les hoteliers

Billing and Invoicing 77% negatif

Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.

Rapports et analyses 60% negatif

Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.

Fonctionnalites uniques

Multilingue Multi-devise CRM invité Profils d'invités Assistance en ligne 24h/24 et 7j/7
4.7/5 facilite d'utilisation 4.3/5 support 335 integrations
Visiter le site web

Ou les notes divergent le plus

Note globale Mews 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
Facilite d'utilisation Mews 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
Support client Mews 4.3 vs 0.0 (+4.3)
Rapport qualite-prix Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
Integration Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)

Questions frequentes sur Luopan Arcas PMS vs Mews PMS

Luopan Arcas PMS peut-il remplacer Mews PMS ?

Cela depend de vos besoins. Luopan Arcas PMS et Mews PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Luopan Arcas PMS propose 0 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Mews PMS en propose 335. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.

Lequel est le mieux adapte aux petits hotels ou hotels independants ?

Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.

Luopan Arcas PMS ou Mews PMS proposent-ils une offre gratuite ?

Luopan Arcas PMS : Non. Mews PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.

Comment HTR evalue-t-il et classe-t-il Luopan Arcas PMS et Mews PMS ?

Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Luopan a un HT Score de 0 et Mews a 100. Voici comment le score est calcule.

Groupe de criteres Ponderation Ce qu'il mesure
Notes et avis clients

A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ?

Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas

Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection.

Ecosysteme partenaire

A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ?

Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations

Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte.

Orientation client

A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ?

Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil

Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques.

Portee, perennite et ressources

Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ?

Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance

Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois.

Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →

Obtenez votre rapport d'analyste IA gratuit

Recommandations personnalisées adaptées à votre propriété

Ghostel icon
Approuvé par
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

Cherchons les informations sur votre hôtel