The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 370 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ACIGRUP shines .
Stayntouch shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 370 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 370 |
After analyzing 370 verified reviews, ACIGRUP users most value its , while Stayntouch users highlight user-friendly interface, integration and onboarding, system performance and reliability. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| ACIGRUP |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Room Management and Housekeeping
▾
|
|
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | ACIGRUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #18 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 29 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 58 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | ACIGRUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #6 220 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #6 180 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 152 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | ACIGRUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #4 262 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 64 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 3 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's operational success and guest satisfaction. Both ACI Hotel by ACIGRUP and Stayntouch aim to address core hotel management challenges, such as reservations, guest profiles, and reporting. However, their approaches and market presence differ significantly—ACIGRUP offers a less documented, AI-driven platform, while Stayntouch is a highly-rated, widely used cloud PMS with extensive features. Do you prioritize a proven, feature-rich platform or a more experimental, AI-enabled solution?
Both ACI Hotel and Stayntouch target hotel operations, but they diverge in market presence and user feedback. ACI Hotel claims to incorporate AI for review analysis and operational insights, but lacks extensive reviews or real-world user feedback, raising questions about its maturity and support. Conversely, Stayntouch boasts over 317 reviews with a 4.56/5 overall rating, and a recent surge in positive feedback, making it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven solutions. Given the limited data on ACI Hotel, can you afford to rely on an untested platform?
If your hotel needs a mature, well-supported cloud PMS with a wide range of features, go with Stayntouch. It is ideal for hotels seeking extensive integrations, mobile check-in, revenue management, and multi-property oversight. If your team is interested in a platform promising AI review analysis and simplified AI insights—despite less proven track records—then ACI Hotel could appeal, but only if you're comfortable with limited user feedback and uncertain support.
Stayntouch scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile-friendly design. Users have described it as easy to learn and operate, with some noting that training is efficient and staff adoption rapid. In contrast, ACI Hotel's UX ratings and onboarding data aren't available, and its lack of recent reviews makes usability assessments impossible. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 49 features, including revenue management, online check-in, guest profiles, and real-time reporting—features vital for modern hotel management. ACI Hotel provides no documented features, suggesting it may lack the depth of functionalities that Stayntouch delivers. The extensive feature set of Stayntouch is especially meaningful for hotels wanting control over operations and revenue. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch's support ratings are high at 4.68/5, with reviewers highlighting its friendly, responsive support and thorough onboarding. Many describe their onboarding as smooth and appreciate the ongoing support, making it easier to implement and maintain the system. In contrast, ACI Hotel's support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, and the lack of recent reviews on ACIGRUP suggests limited support data. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified third-party systems, including notable partners like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and contactless check-in providers. ACI Hotel has no confirmed integrations, which could limit its operational flexibility. For hotels prioritizing a connected ecosystem and automation, Stayntouch's extensive integrations are a significant advantage. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch holds a 4.56/5 overall rating, with recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use, guest service improvements, and staff productivity boosts. It is favored across hotel segments, including boutique and branded hotels, with a rating of 4.93/5 from independent hotels. ACIGRUP's lack of reviews prevents meaningful comparison, but the absence of recent feedback suggests less user confidence. Edge: Stayntouch.
ACIGRUP's pricing details are unavailable, making it hard to assess its value. Stayntouch charges a flat $800 monthly fee, with no additional implementation or per-room charges, offering transparent pricing for budgeting. For clarity and predictable costs, Stayntouch provides more certainty. If budget transparency is crucial, stay with Stayntouch.
The core difference lies in market presence and user validation. Stayntouch is a well-established, trusted platform with extensive features, integrations, and recent positive reviews, making it the safer choice. ACI Hotel offers AI-driven analysis, but its lack of reviews and limited market data mean risks are higher; it might suit experimental or niche properties willing to accept uncertainty.
If your priority is a tested, scalable platform with proven support, go with Stayntouch. It excels in ease of use, features, integrations, and hotel satisfaction—validated by recent, high-quality reviews. Choose ACI Hotel only if your hotel is comfortable risking its limited market validation for the potential of AI insights and innovative features.
In summary, for most hotels evaluating property management solutions today, Stayntouch remains the more dependable, feature-complete, and user-loved option. Only early adopters or highly innovative hotels should consider ACI Hotel, and only if they are prepared for the uncertainties tied to less proven platforms.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| ACIGRUP |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ACI Hotel and Stayntouch share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | ACIGRUP |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 37 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
What hoteliers love
The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements ar... The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements are highlighted as aiding faster task execution and enhancing staff capability, thus improving guest interactions.
Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. T... Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. The guidance provided by these individuals was deemed invaluable, particularly for system transition and setup.
Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns ove... Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns over the speed of addressing complex issues amidst rapid company growth.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack deta... While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack detail or are hard to manipulate, highlighting the need for customizable analytics solutions.
Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functi... Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functionality in room diary visibility and tasks scheduling to address specific management needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ACI Hotel and Stayntouch share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ACI Hotel offers 0 verified integration partners, while Stayntouch offers 187. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Stayntouch leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ACI Hotel: No. Stayntouch: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ACIGRUP has an HT Score of 0 and Stayntouch has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor