The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 370 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acigroup shines .
Stayntouch shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 370 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 370 |
After analyzing 370 verified reviews, Acigroup users most value its , while Stayntouch users highlight user-friendly interface, integration and onboarding, system performance and reliability. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Acigroup |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Room Management and Housekeeping
▾
|
|
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #18 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 29 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 58 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #6 220 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #6 180 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 152 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #4 262 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 64 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 3 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system is critical for your hotel's operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both Acigrup PMS and Stayntouch aim to serve this purpose, but their core functionalities, user experiences, and market presence differ significantly. Acigrup offers a less established, less reviewed platform, while Stayntouch boasts a robust, highly-rated solution with extensive features and integrations. Your decision should hinge on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and future growth plans—are you looking for a proven, easy-to-use system or an all-encompassing platform with extensive third-party support?
Acigrup is a little-known player with zero recent reviews, while Stayntouch benefits from 317 reviews in the last six months, indicating a more active and engaged user base. Given the data, Stayntouch’s higher ratings across all categories make it the clear market leader and more reliable choice for most hotels. Are you prepared to invest in a platform with a proven track record?
Both Acigrup and Stayntouch aim to manage hotel operations, but their market presence and user feedback reveal stark differences. Acigrup's platform, with no recent reviews and an overall rating of 0/5, leaves hoteliers without current user insights or validation of its performance, raising questions about its ongoing development and support. Conversely, Stayntouch’s 4.56/5 overall score, backed by 317 recent reviews, confirms its relevance, stability, and customer satisfaction.
Stayntouch is praised for its ease of use, extensive features, and robust integrations, making it suitable for varied hotel types. Acigrup appears to lack corroborated features, support, or a clear deployment case, which makes it difficult for hoteliers to assess its suitability. Given the recent, detailed reviews, does Acigrup truly meet your operational needs, or are you better served by a platform with proven user satisfaction?
If your hotel requires a well-supported, full-featured PMS with extensive integrations, scalability, and proven user satisfaction, go with Stayntouch. Its high review count and recent ratings confirm that it reliably enhances operational efficiency and guest experience. For smaller or less complex properties that may require only basic system management or are interested in a less-expensive solution, Acigrup might seem tempting, but the lack of recent validation makes it risky.
Hotels in need of multi-property management, contactless check-in, and mobile guest engagement should prioritize Stayntouch. If your team is looking for a system with proven track records, superior user ratings, and a broad partner network, Stayntouch is the safer, smarter choice.
Stayntouch has a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on over 26 recent reviews, with users consistently highlighting its intuitive, mobile-friendly interface and quick onboarding. Customers praise the system for its straightforward navigation, fast staff training, and minimal adoption issues—some describe the platform as “the most user-friendly screens out there” and “easy to learn and work with.”
Acigrup, with a zero score on ease of use and no recent reviews, offers no validated user experience data, making it impossible to assess its interface or onboarding process. Based on current feedback, your team is significantly more likely to adopt and effectively use Stayntouch without extensive training. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 49 distinct features, including revenue management, online check-in, guest profiling, automated night audit, mobile housekeeping, and integrated payment solutions—features that Acigrup does not publicly list or support. These features are critical for streamlining operations, personalizing guest experiences, and increasing revenue potential.
Acigrup’s offering appears limited or undocumented, with no unique features detailed or highlighted in recent reviews. Without specific feature validation, Stayntouch’s extensive, proven functionalities give it a decisive advantage. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s recent reviews consistently mention excellent onboarding and support, with a 4.68/5 customer support rating and comments like “the training team is friendly and thorough” and “support is always available to assist.” The system’s support reputation underscores its commitment to customer success and smooth implementation.
In contrast, Acigrup has no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its customer service quality unverified. Without confirmed support performance, your hotel is safer with Stayntouch, which demonstrates a clear advantage. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified third-party integrations, including popular channel managers, revenue tools, and contactless check-in solutions, facilitating comprehensive hotel management. Shared integrations with Acigrup are nonexistent, and it lacks a verified partner network, limiting its flexibility and future scalability.
For hotels seeking a platform that connects seamlessly with other systems, Stayntouch’s extensive partner ecosystem is a clear benefit. Acigrup’s limited or unknown integration capabilities make it less appealing. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s recent reviews yield a 4.56/5 rating, with high marks from a variety of hotel segments, including boutique, branded, and independent properties. Hotels like the TWA Hotel and Stoney Creek Hospitality report significant operational improvements and ROI, with one hotel noting "real ROI and streamlined operations."
Acigrup, with no recent reviews, offers no current user feedback or ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction. Given the data, Stayntouch is clearly the higher-rated, more trusted platform. Edge: Stayntouch.
Acigrup does not publicly disclose pricing or offer a trial, which complicates cost comparisons. Stayntouch charges $800 per month, with no additional implementation fees, providing transparent, predictable costs.
The lack of pricing transparency for Acigrup makes budgeting difficult, while Stayntouch’s straightforward monthly fee and clear value proposition support better financial planning. If cost clarity influences your decision, Stayntouch’s transparent pricing gives it an edge.
Not ideal if your hotel needs proven reliability, extensive features, multi-property management, or mobile guest services, as Acigrup’s capabilities are unverified and unsupported by recent user reviews.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on an exceptionally tight budget and prefers a basic, no-frills system without extensive integrations or mobile functionalities.
The core difference is that Stayntouch offers a proven, feature-rich, highly-rated platform supported by extensive user feedback, while Acigrup remains largely unvalidated with no recent reviews or detailed features. For hotels looking for reliability, scalability, and advanced capabilities, Stayntouch clearly leads the market.
Choose Stayntouch if you need a flexible, well-supported system that can grow with your hotel’s needs and deliver measurable operational improvements. Its broad integration network and positive user experiences make it the safer investment for most properties.
If your hotel is small, budget-constrained, or only seeking a simple reservation solution, and you are willing to accept the risk of limited support and unverified features, Acigrup might suffice. However, the lack of recent validation makes this a risky choice for long-term success.
In summary, for most hotels aiming to improve efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue, Stayntouch is the recommended platform—its recent reviews, extensive features, and proven support surpass what Acigrup offers today.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Acigroup |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Acigrup PMS and Stayntouch share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 37 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
What hoteliers love
The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements ar... The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements are highlighted as aiding faster task execution and enhancing staff capability, thus improving guest interactions.
Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. T... Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. The guidance provided by these individuals was deemed invaluable, particularly for system transition and setup.
Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns ove... Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns over the speed of addressing complex issues amidst rapid company growth.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack deta... While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack detail or are hard to manipulate, highlighting the need for customizable analytics solutions.
Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functi... Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functionality in room diary visibility and tasks scheduling to address specific management needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Acigrup PMS and Stayntouch share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Acigrup PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Stayntouch offers 187. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Stayntouch leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Acigrup PMS: No. Stayntouch: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acigroup has an HT Score of 0 and Stayntouch has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor