The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 62 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acomos shines , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Counter shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 62 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 5 | 57 |
After analyzing 62 verified reviews, Acomos users most value its , while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #46 5 reviews | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #56 2 reviews | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | #60 1 reviews | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #55 1 reviews | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #47 1 reviews | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #33 5 reviews | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing between Acomos and Counter essentially hinges on what your hotel needs most: comprehensive management features or streamlined simplicity for hostels. Acomos offers a broad set of tools designed to cater to larger or more complex properties, whereas Counter emphasizes ease of use, automation, and affordability for hostels. Both systems aim to simplify operations, but they diverge significantly in scope, usability, and target market.
While Acomos has a larger global presence, more features, and more extensive integrations, Counter boasts a higher overall user rating, more recent reviews, and a faster-growing customer base. Which of these strengths aligns better with your hotel's current priorities?
Acomos and Counter both serve as property management systems but cater to different hotel types and operational sizes. Acomos attempts to address the needs of diverse property segments, including airport/conference hotels, boutique inns, and larger independent hotels, offering tools like revenue management, guest CRM, and integrated payment solutions. Counter, on the other hand, is tailored specifically for hostels, focusing on ease of use, automation, and mobile management, making it ideal for small, fast-paced properties.
The data shows Acomos has only 5 reviews, with no recent activity, and a low 3.1/5 overall rating, indicating limited current customer feedback or ongoing development. Conversely, Counter has 54 reviews, all recent, with a high 4.73/5 rating, demonstrating active user engagement and satisfaction. Given the more recent reviews and higher ratings, Counter’s current user experience appears more reliable.
Hoteliers need to evaluate whether they require a full-featured PMS with advanced modules or a straightforward platform that minimizes training and maximizes automation. Are you looking for a system that scales with your property or one optimized for quick adoption and daily efficiency?
If your hotel manages a hostel, boutique inn, or small independent property, Counter is the better choice. Its streamlined interface, mobile accessibility, automated functions, and positive recent reviews make it ideal for properties prioritizing guest experience and operational simplicity. Many users highlight Counter’s ease of use, quick onboarding, and responsive support, which is critical for fast-paced or resource-constrained teams.
If your hotel is larger, needs revenue management, guest CRM, or integrated EPoS, Acomos may be more suitable despite its limited recent feedback. Acomos's extensive feature set—covering more specialized needs—appeals to properties with complex operations or those looking to centralize management across multiple departments.
For properties focused on speed, ease, and guest experience, Counter is the safer pick. For hotels with more complex operational requirements and the resources to implement a broader system, Acomos could provide long-term value.
Counter scores significantly higher for ease of use, with a 4.6/5 rating, compared to Acomos’s 3.5/5. User reviews consistently praise Counter’s intuitive, mobile-friendly interface, and quick onboarding, with many mentioning how new staff can learn the system rapidly. Support responsiveness is also a key strength, with users citing fast and friendly assistance.
Acomos’s lower onboarding score of 2.63/5 reflects its more complex interface, which may require more time and training to adopt. Its older reviews mention a learning curve, and recent feedback indicates limited customer support activity.
Edge: Counter.
Acomos offers 16 shared features with Counter, but also includes 9 unique modules such as revenue management, guest CRM, EPoS, gift vouchers, and native email marketing—features not present in Counter. It also integrates with fewer platforms (two verified partners) but provides more specialized tools for large or multi-department hotels.
Counter provides 16 shared features and 3 exclusive features, notably a mobile app, multi-lingual support, and centralized user management. Its automation capabilities—contactless check-in, automatic payments—are prominent advantages, especially for hostels or small hotels.
Given the feature count, Acomos's additional modules may be overkill for smaller properties, while Counter’s automation and mobile features directly enhance operational efficiency in fast-paced hostel environments.
Edge: Acomos, for its broader, more in-depth feature set.
Counter’s customer support scores a near-perfect 4.96/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses from Evelyn and Max. Many users appreciate the responsiveness, especially in urgent situations, and the ongoing improvements driven by customer feedback.
Acomos’s support score of 3.3/5 indicates a more inconsistent experience. Recent reviews criticize limited responsiveness and slow issue resolution, which could hamper daily operations. The older reviews suggest the support was better previously but has declined recently.
Edge: Counter.
Counter surpasses Acomos with 7 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Stripe, Goki, Cloudbeds, and WuBook, along with the shared partner SiteMinder. Its broader integration ecosystem facilitates connecting with industry-standard tools, simplifying operations.
Acomos only integrates with two verified partners, one of which is SiteMinder, limiting connectivity options. For a hotel seeking extensive platform integration, Counter’s network offers more flexibility.
Edge: Counter.
Recent reviews reveal Counter’s higher sentiment, with a 4.75/5 rating from 52 reviews, mainly from hostel properties. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Acomos’s reviews are limited, with an overall rating of 3.1/5 based on 5 reviews, only some of which are recent or positive. Its older reviews indicate satisfaction among long-term users but no recent activity to reflect current performance.
Therefore, Counter’s higher and more recent ratings demonstrate greater customer satisfaction today.
Edge: Counter.
Pricing details for Acomos are not publicly available, but it does not offer a freemium plan or transparent monthly rates, suggesting a custom or enterprise-level pricing model. Acomos’s implementation and ongoing support costs are likely covered within a higher-tier plan, suitable for larger hotels.
Counter is also free to start with, with no implementation or monthly fees disclosed. Its pricing model appears straightforward, making it accessible for small hostels and independent hotels without large budgets.
For strict budget considerations, Counter’s transparency and free entry point offer a clear advantage; for larger operations, Acomos’s custom pricing may reflect its broader feature set.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, needs quick setup, or prioritizes affordability over specialized features.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive revenue management, CRM, or multi-department capabilities.
Acomos is a broad, feature-rich property management system tailored for larger or more complex hotels. Its strength lies in its extensive modules and integrations, but its limited recent customer feedback and support concerns suggest it may not match current market expectations.
Counter excels in simplicity, automation, and rapid support, making it a compelling choice for hostels and small hotels that prioritize operational ease and guest experience. Its high recent ratings and active user community indicate a system that adapts quickly to user needs.
If your hotel values a comprehensive platform capable of scaling with your operations, Acomos remains a viable choice—though its limited recent activity warrants caution. For quick deployment, ease of use, and ongoing support, Counter is the more reliable option today.
In conclusion, if your priority is a flexible, user-friendly PMS with active support and recent positive feedback, Counter is the clear winner. If you operate a larger or more complex property and need an in-depth management system, Acomos could meet your long-term needs, provided you’re prepared for a potentially steeper learning curve.
Note: All observations are based on the latest reviews and available data. Hotel managers should consider their specific operational needs and budget before making a decision.
According to HTR's product database, Acomos and Counter share 16 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Acomos and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Acomos offers 2 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Counter leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 3.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Acomos: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acomos has an HT Score of 0 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor