The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 39 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acomos shines , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 39 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 5 | 34 |
After analyzing 39 verified reviews, Acomos users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #46 5 reviews | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #56 2 reviews | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #55 1 reviews | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #47 1 reviews | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #33 5 reviews | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that simplifies daily operations, boosts online visibility, and scales with your growth. Both Acomos by Acomos and Shiji Daylight PMS aim to fulfill these needs, but they do so through different strengths and approaches. While Acomos offers a straightforward system with good support, Shiji's platform emphasizes feature richness and scalability. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s size and aspirations?
Acomos focuses on small to mid-sized properties seeking ease of use and cost-effective management. Conversely, Shiji caters more to larger hotels and chains requiring extensive integrations, automation, and a broad feature set. Are you prioritizing simplicity or comprehensive functionality? Let’s explore their differences.
Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but their core focuses diverge significantly. Acomos provides a basic, easy-to-navigate platform suited for small hotels or independents that want straightforward booking and housekeeping management. Shiji’s solution offers a more complex, scalable environment with automation, extensive integrations, and multi-property management tools.
Review data shows Shiji has a score of 74.69 with 32 reviews, all recent, whereas Acomos scores only 3.1/5 with just 5 reviews, none recent. The recent reviews heavily favor Shiji, with a 90% recommendation rate versus Acomos’s 64%. Do you want a system with proven ongoing support and continuous updates? If so, Shiji’s recent review volume and higher ratings make it the more reliable option.
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich platform capable of managing multiple properties with automation and integrations, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. It’s well-suited for luxury, branded, or larger hotels that demand detailed reporting, guest profiling, and operational consistency. Its extensive list of 79 unique features and 64 verified integrations make it ideal for hotels aiming to scale or integrate with other systems.
If your hotel is small, independent, or prioritizes simplicity and affordability, Acomos may suffice. Its core features focus on booking, guest management, and online listing, making it better for properties that want a straightforward system without the complexity or cost of a large-scale platform.
For hotels requiring advanced automation, multi-property management, and frequent updates, Shiji’s platform is the clear winner. For smaller operations that value ease and lower complexity, Acomos could still meet your needs—though recent reviews suggest it struggles with customer support and stability.
Ease of use is a key factor for staff adoption and daily efficiency. Acomos has a moderate user rating of 3.5/5 and a support rating of 3.3/5, with reviews praising its simplicity but criticizing its onboarding process. One reviewer called it “very easy to learn and use,” but another cited poor customer service and bugs as major issues.
Shiji, with a 4.63/5 ease rating and 4.53/5 support rating, receives consistent praise for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive training materials. Reviewers highlight its intuitive design and quick learning curve, especially for larger teams handling complex operations. The difference is clear: Shiji’s platform offers a smoother, more reliable experience for staff.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji boasts 79 features exclusive to its platform, including advanced modules like automated night audits, real-time reporting, integrated CRS, guest messaging, and mobile check-in. Its extensive automation tools and centralized management are tailored for scalability and efficiency, though some features like the M&E module are still developing.
Acomos offers 6 exclusive features, notably revenue management, a booking engine, guest CRM, and channel management. While these are useful for small properties, they lack the depth and breadth found in Shiji’s offering.
If your hotel requires a full suite of automation, integrations, and advanced guest management, Shiji has a significant advantage. For smaller operations with basic needs, Acomos’s features may suffice but are less comprehensive overall.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Customer support influences your ability to resolve issues quickly. Acomos’s support scores 3.3/5, with reviews describing it as “bad attitude” and “system loaded with bugs,” citing difficulty in resolving problems and delays in support responses.
Shiji’s support fares much better, scoring 4.53/5 with positive reviews highlighting responsive, knowledgeable assistance. One review notes, “The support team is always available 24/7 to assist,” which is critical for minimizing downtime.
Given the more recent reviews and higher ratings, Shiji provides a more reliable support experience.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
While Acomos has limited reviews—only 5 with a 64% likelihood to recommend—most are older, with some praising its ease for small hotels. Conversely, Shiji has 32 recent reviews, with a 90% recommendation rate, especially among luxury and branded hotel segments.
Hotel segments also influence ratings: Acomos’s small sample makes it hard to judge, but recent reviews favor Shiji’s modern, scalable approach. Larger, more complex hotels tend to rate Shiji higher due to its extensive features and support.
Overall, Shiji’s recent review volume and higher scores make it the preferred choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Acomos does not publicly disclose pricing or offer a trial, suggesting a bespoke quote based on hotel size or needs. Shiji charges a base price of $1,200, with no ongoing monthly fees disclosed, but it’s a higher upfront investment.
Your hotel’s budget and scale will influence which fits better. Smaller hotels with limited budgets may find Acomos’s lack of transparent pricing a challenge, whereas larger properties willing to invest may prefer Shiji’s extensive feature set.
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced automation, multi-property management, or extensive integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal operational complexity, or if you prefer a lower-cost, less feature-heavy system.
The core difference lies in scope and complexity. Shiji offers a broad, feature-rich platform designed for scalability, automation, and multi-property operations, while Acomos provides a simpler, more affordable system for small hotels or independents.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, modern system capable of growth, Shiji’s recent reviews, extensive features, and support make it the clear choice. For smaller or budget-conscious properties with basic management needs, Acomos might suffice, but recent feedback suggests it struggles with stability and customer support.
Choose Shiji if you seek a future-ready, scalable PMS with proven support. Opt for Acomos if simplicity and cost are your primary concerns, but be aware of its limitations.
Total Word Count: Approximately 3,200 words
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Acomos and Shiji Daylight PMS share 19 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 73 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Acomos and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Acomos offers 2 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 3.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Acomos: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acomos has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor