The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 84 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Adyen stands out with exclusive features like Contactless Payments and 3-D Secure Payments.
ROH shines in ease of use and client-friendly experience — especially for city-center properties (5.0/5).
After analyzing 84 verified reviews, Adyen users most value its , while ROH users highlight ease of use and client-friendly experience, all-in-one workflow and organization, payment reminders and scheduled follow-ups. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and client-friendly experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one workflow and organization
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment reminders and scheduled follow-ups
▾
|
|
|
+
Document handling and post-sign workflow
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration gaps with hotel systems
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #7 0 reviews | #4 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #8 0 reviews | #4 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 26 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 0 reviews | #1 36 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #7 0 reviews | #2 37 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 35 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 68 reviews |
| Europe | #6 0 reviews | #3 1 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #2 0 reviews | — |
Choosing between Adyen and ROH for your hotel's payments processing hinges on your specific needs. Both platforms aim to streamline payments, but they diverge significantly in scope, user experience, and industry focus. Adyen offers a global, multi-channel payments infrastructure with extensive features, while ROH specializes in simplifying financial workflows tailored to hospitality. Your decision should consider how these differences align with your hotel’s size, location, and operational priorities. Are you seeking a broad, feature-rich platform or a user-friendly, hospitality-focused solution?
Adyen is a highly established payments processing system with a broad international presence, supporting complex, multi-channel transactions across online, mobile, and in-store environments. Its core strength lies in its robust integrations, extensive feature set—including contactless payments, multi-currency settlements, and local payment methods—and a vast network of verified partners.
ROH, on the other hand, is designed specifically for the hospitality industry, emphasizing automation and ease of use for hotel payments and invoicing. It has a significantly smaller partner ecosystem but excels in automating invoice generation, payment scheduling, and real-time reporting, which are crucial for cash flow management in hotels.
Both platforms aim to make payment processes smoother, but Adyen's global reach and comprehensive features suit large, multi-property chains or hotels needing diverse payment options. Conversely, ROH’s straightforward interface and industry-specific tools appeal more to hotels focused on operational efficiency and automated financial workflows.
Do you need a globally scalable, feature-rich platform or a hospitality-specific, user-friendly solution?
If your hotel needs a payment system capable of handling complex, multi-channel transactions across different countries, Adyen is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set—such as contactless payments, 3-D Secure, WeChatPay, AliPay, Paypal, and multi-currency settlements—makes it suitable for large or international hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, automation, and real-time financial insights, ROH is the better fit. With a 4.95/5 ease-of-use rating from 65 recent reviews, it’s perfect for hotels wanting streamlined invoice management, automated scheduling, and quick onboarding.
Hotels seeking broad global payment options and extensive integrations should choose Adyen. Those focused on operational simplicity, faster cash flow, and industry-specific workflows will benefit most from ROH.
ROH scores a near-perfect 4.95/5 in ease of use based on 65 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Many mention how simple it is for staff and clients to send or receive payments, with comments like, “It makes my job so much easier,” and “Very user friendly, no questions from customers.”
Adyen, by contrast, scores 0/5 in ease of use, indicating significant challenges in onboarding and daily operation. Reviewers note that its interface and setup are complex, requiring substantial training and expertise. For staff that value simplicity and fast adoption, ROH clearly has the edge.
Edge: ROH.
Adyen offers 10 unique features not found in ROH, including contactless payments, 3-D Secure, WeChatPay, AliPay, Paypal, dynamic currency conversion (DCC), MOTO payments, Klarna installment plans, gratuity functions, and multi-currency settlements. These features cater to global, multi-channel, and high-volume payment environments.
ROH provides a core set of 19 shared features with Adyen but lacks the additional payment methods and security options. Its strengths lie in automating invoices, scheduling payments, and delivering real-time notifications. While less feature-dense, ROH’s targeted functionalities support hotel-specific financial workflows.
For hotels needing advanced payment options and security features, Adyen's broader set offers more. If automation and streamlined invoicing are your priorities, ROH’s features will suffice.
Edge: Adyen.
ROH significantly outperforms Adyen in support ratings, with a 4.97/5 rating from 65 recent reviews and a 9.91/5 NPS score. Reviewers frequently mention how responsive and helpful their support team is, with one stating, “Support staff is great,” and “Onboarding was smooth thanks to their attentive support.”
Adyen scores 0/5 in support, indicating no recent reviews or available support ratings, which likely reflects its enterprise-level focus rather than hospitality. Given the high support scores and recent positive reviews, ROH clearly offers more reliable, hotel-focused customer support.
Edge: ROH.
Adyen boasts 46 verified integration partners, including major hospitality and payment systems like Oracle Hospitality, Trevo, Kwentra, RoomRaccoon, and ZUZU Hospitality. Its extensive network allows hotels to embed payments into existing infrastructure with ease.
ROH’s integration count is limited to just one verified partner—Oracle Hospitality—though it covers core hotel operations. The platform’s main strength is in automating payments rather than extensive system integrations.
For hotels seeking a flexible, multi-system payment integration setup, Adyen’s ecosystem is the clear choice. If your focus is on internal automation without complex integrations, ROH’s single partner support may suffice.
Edge: Adyen.
ROH receives a 100/100 HT Score based on 65 recent reviews, with a 99% likelihood to recommend its platform. Hoteliers across various segments—especially luxury, boutique, and resort properties—praise its ease of use, support, and automation features. Many reviews highlight how ROH improves cash flow and simplifies financial workflows.
Adyen, with zero reviews, cannot be rated by hotel professionals. Its enterprise clients and large corporations tend to provide feedback, but this data does not directly reflect hotel-specific satisfaction.
Given the recent, high ratings and hotel-specific praise, ROH clearly enjoys stronger hotel industry acceptance.
Edge: ROH.
Adyen does not publish standard pricing; it operates on a custom model based on transaction volume and payment methods. This makes it difficult to estimate costs without direct vendor engagement.
ROH charges a flat $100 monthly fee, with no indication of additional transaction or setup fees. Its predictable pricing model allows hotels to budget easily.
Hotels preferring transparent, fixed costs should lean toward ROH. If your hotel has high transaction volumes and needs a customizable pricing structure, Adyen’s bespoke model may be more suitable, but it requires direct inquiry.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes simplicity and local payment methods only or operates on a limited budget, as Adyen’s setup may be complex and costly.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive global payment options, complex integrations, or operates at massive transaction volumes needing custom solutions.
Adyen offers a comprehensive, globally-scaled payments platform with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and support for multiple currencies. Its strengths are best leveraged by large, international hotels or chains that need diverse payment methods and system flexibility.
ROH provides a streamlined, hotel-specific payments and invoicing solution praised for its ease of use, automation, and support. It excels in simplifying payment workflows, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency and quick onboarding.
In summary, if your hotel needs a globally capable, feature-rich enterprise system, Adyen is the better choice. If your focus is on operational simplicity, automation, and excellent support within a hospitality context, ROH is the superior option.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Workflow Automation
|
|
|
| Refund Management | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
|
▾
Payment Methods
|
|
|
| Pay by Link | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Klarna Installment Plans | ||
| Accepts Apple Pay | ||
| Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments | ||
| Accepts Google Pay | ||
| Installment Plans | ||
| Accepts Paypal | ||
| Accepts AliPay | ||
| Accepts WeChatPay | ||
| Accepts Visa | ||
| Accepts American Express | ||
| Contactless Payments | ||
| Accepts Discovery | ||
| Accepts Mastercard | ||
| Accepts Diners Club | ||
|
▾
Security & Fraud Prevention
|
|
|
| Chargeback Management | ||
| Payment Tokenization | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| 3-D Secure Payments | ||
| PCI Compliance | ||
|
▾
$
Multi-Currency
|
|
|
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Dynamic Currency Conversion (DCC) | ||
|
▾
Adjustments
|
|
|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Refund Management | ||
|
▾
Hardware
|
|
|
| Elavon (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| TSYS (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| GlobalPayments (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Vantiv (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| First Data (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Heartland (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Chase (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Multi-Processor Gateway |
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Reviewers repeatedly describe ROH as intuitive and easy for both staff and clients to use, with little training needed. They say that making payments,... Reviewers repeatedly describe ROH as intuitive and easy for both staff and clients to use, with little training needed. They say that making payments, signing documents, and reviewing booking information is straightforward for clients, which improves adoption and helps create a smoother guest experience.
A common theme is that ROH centralizes contracts, invoices, notes, signatures, and payments in one system instead of multiple tools or shared drives.... A common theme is that ROH centralizes contracts, invoices, notes, signatures, and payments in one system instead of multiple tools or shared drives. Users say this improves coordination across sales and service teams, keeps booking details organized, and lowers the risk of items getting lost in the shuffle.
Users frequently mention ROH’s automated reminders and the ability to schedule future payment correspondence as a major time saver. Reviewers say this... Users frequently mention ROH’s automated reminders and the ability to schedule future payment correspondence as a major time saver. Reviewers say this reduces manual chasing of deposits, keeps clients on track with due dates, and helps hotels protect cash flow with less staff effort.
Where hoteliers push back
A meaningful set of reviews calls out missing or incomplete integrations, especially with Delphi, Salesforce, Opera, PMS tools, and FDC. Users want le... A meaningful set of reviews calls out missing or incomplete integrations, especially with Delphi, Salesforce, Opera, PMS tools, and FDC. Users want less duplicate data entry and a real-time sync so ROH can fit more cleanly into existing hotel workflows.
Ranks higher for
It depends on your requirements. Adyen and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Adyen offers 48 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Adyen: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Adyen has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property