The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 78 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AeroGuest shines , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Lobby Kiosk.
Crave Interactive shines when it comes to customer service — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like QR Codes and In-Venue Ordering.
Side-by-side ratings based on 78 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 11 | 67 |
After analyzing 78 verified reviews, AeroGuest users most value its , while Crave Interactive users highlight customer service, user interface, customization. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
|
|
+
User interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest communication
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Hardware issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Seamless system integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Back-end system
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #29 0 reviews | #6 13 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #13 8 reviews | #9 26 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #18 2 reviews | #4 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #19 1 reviews | #5 7 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 8 reviews | #6 26 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #18 3 reviews | #5 31 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #22 1 reviews | #4 27 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #19 0 reviews | #10 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #23 0 reviews | #4 26 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #13 10 reviews | #8 31 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #8 2 reviews |
| Middle East | #9 1 reviews | #8 1 reviews |
Choosing between AeroGuest Journey by AeroGuest and Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for guest engagement and operational automation. Both solutions aim to enhance guest experiences, but they approach this with different features, integrations, and usability models. Understanding their core strengths and limitations helps determine which best fits your property.
AeroGuest is designed to streamline hotel operations via deep PMS integration and offer comprehensive automation, while Crave focuses on engaging guests through in-venue ordering and mobile access. Which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both AeroGuest and Crave serve as guest apps but solve distinct hotel challenges. AeroGuest emphasizes automating check-in/out, PMS integration, and digital keys, reducing front desk workload and printing costs, thus fitting hotels seeking operational efficiency. Crave prioritizes guest engagement through in-venue ordering, QR codes, and service automation, making it ideal for properties wanting to boost food and beverage sales.
While AeroGuest boasts a 0/5 rating in the source, indicating limited review data, it has a high NPS score of 9.44/5 and more recent reviews. Crave, with 48 reviews and a 4.75/5 overall, provides more recent feedback showing strong user satisfaction. Do you value robust recent reviews and proven large-scale use?
If your hotel needs a full guest journey automation, especially with PMS integration, mobile check-in, and digital keys, AeroGuest is the clear choice. It’s best for hotels aiming to reduce front desk workload, streamline operations, and offer personalized pre-arrival interactions.
Conversely, if your focus is on increasing F&B sales, offering in-venue ordering, and engaging guests throughout their stay with mobile services, Crave is more suitable. Its strong reputation among properties that prioritize guest interaction and food service makes it preferable for hotels with active F&B outlets.
For boutique or city-center hotels looking for operational automation, AeroGuest’s extensive features and integrations make it appealing. For resorts, inns, or hotels emphasizing on-site guest services and food, Crave’s engaging interface and ordering capabilities fit better.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
AeroGuest scores slightly higher in ease of use, with a 4.78/5 rating compared to Crave’s 4.61/5. Its onboarding process and user interface receive consistent praise for simplicity, supporting staff adoption and guest usability. AeroGuest’s intuitive dashboards and straightforward guest flow are regularly highlighted in reviews.
Crave’s user interface is also highly rated, praised for being customizable and friendly, but some feedback notes it could benefit from a more modern design and easier menu management. Crave’s hardware durability and back-end complexity can sometimes hinder ease of use.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest offers a broad set of 20 unique features, including mobile check-in, PMS integration, self-service check-ins/out, digital room keys, guest segmentation, and loyalty integrations. Its ability to handle pre-arrival upselling, device independence, and in-app re-booking makes it a versatile operational tool.
Crave provides 5 exclusive features, notably QR codes, in-venue and multi-menu ordering, POS integration, and tipping. Its strengths lie in guest interaction points, especially food and beverage ordering and seamless in-venue service.
While AeroGuest’s extensive feature set caters to operational needs, Crave’s specialized offerings excel in guest engagement and F&B services. Which feature suite aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest’s customer support scores an impressive 4.89/5, with reviews emphasizing the approachable, innovative team committed to continuous improvement. Users mention quick support responses and a proactive attitude, enhancing the onboarding and ongoing experience.
Crave’s customer support is equally strong, rated 4.79/5, with reviews praising quick, helpful responses and dedicated support teams. Some feedback indicates that the back-end system could be modernized, but overall, support remains highly regarded.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest boasts 26 verified integration partners, including major players like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Stayntouch, supporting extensive hotel system connectivity. Integration with property management, payment, and hardware vendors underscores its operational versatility.
Crave offers 17 verified partners, including notable brands such as Allice, Amadeus, and Kipsu, with strong ties to F&B and guest communication systems. Shared partners like Oracle and Infor highlight some common ground.
AeroGuest’s broader and more diverse integration network positions it as the more flexible choice for multi-system hotels.
Edge: AeroGuest.
Crave boasts a higher overall rating of 4.75/5 based on 48 reviews, with recent feedback affirming its ease of use, helpful support, and feature-rich platform. It is favored across luxury, boutique, and branded hotels, with a strong focus on F&B and guest engagement.
AeroGuest’s review count is minimal (9 reviews) and reviews are older or less detailed; it scores a perfect 0/5 in the overall rating, indicating limited data and experience. The high NPS and recent satisfaction signals favor Crave.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
AeroGuest does not publicly list pricing, suggesting a bespoke or enterprise-focused model. It typically involves direct negotiations, often with no implementation fee, but clarity requires direct contact.
Crave charges a straightforward $400 setup fee, with no monthly charges or hidden costs, making its pricing transparent and predictable. Both solutions are premium offerings, but Crave’s clear upfront pricing allows easier budgeting.
Not ideal if your hotel has a limited budget or primarily needs F&B engagement tools without full operational automation.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily needs PMS integration or operational automation rather than guest-facing engagement.
AeroGuest is a comprehensive, automation-centric guest app with extensive integrations, making it ideal if your hotel seeks to streamline operations and reduce manual tasks. Its features support full digital guest journeys, from check-in to loyalty, with a focus on automation and system integration.
Crave is a highly rated, engagement-focused platform excelling in F&B and guest interaction within the hotel environment. Its strengths lie in mobile ordering, QR codes, and intuitive interfaces, making it perfect for hotels aiming to boost on-site sales and guest satisfaction.
Choose AeroGuest if operational efficiency and automation are your top priorities. Opt for Crave if maximizing guest engagement and F&B revenue is more aligned with your hotel’s strategy.
This comprehensive comparison aims to clarify which platform aligns with your hotel’s needs, helping you make an informed, confident decision.
Hotel Guest Apps pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
According to HTR's product database, AeroGuest Journey and Crave Mobile Platform share 20 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Device Agnostic | ||
| Easy Room Selection | ||
| In-Venue Ordering | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Multi-Menu Ordering | ||
| PCI Compliant | ||
| PMS Integration | ||
| POS Integration | ||
| Pre-arrival Upselling & Upgrades | ||
| QR Codes | ||
| Tipping |
Showing top differences. 13 more features differ between these products.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and pr... Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and proactive support, which helps in resolving issues promptly.
While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customiza... While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customizable to better fit individual hotel needs.
Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users ex... Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users express a desire for more control over customizations.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall effici... Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall efficiency and guest satisfaction when using the system.
The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing man... The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing manual entry. This has been particularly beneficial during large events and for managing room services efficiently.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. AeroGuest Journey and Crave Mobile Platform share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. AeroGuest Journey offers 26 verified integration partners, while Crave Mobile Platform offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. AeroGuest Journey leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
AeroGuest Journey: No. Crave Mobile Platform: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AeroGuest has an HT Score of 0 and Crave Interactive has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor