The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 226 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AeroGuest shines , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Lobby Kiosk.
STAY shines when it comes to guest experience optimization — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 226 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 11 | 215 |
After analyzing 226 verified reviews, AeroGuest users most value its , while STAY users highlight guest experience optimization, mobile and user experience, operational efficiency. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest Experience Optimization
▾
|
|
|
+
Mobile and User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Service
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
CMS and Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #29 0 reviews | #9 10 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #13 8 reviews | #4 83 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #18 2 reviews | #2 89 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #19 1 reviews | #2 24 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 8 reviews | #2 77 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #18 3 reviews | #2 88 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #22 1 reviews | #3 91 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #19 0 reviews | #6 7 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #23 0 reviews | #5 27 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #13 10 reviews | #3 112 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #6 3 reviews |
| Middle East | #9 1 reviews | #7 2 reviews |
Choosing the right hotel guest app can significantly influence your guests' experience and your operational efficiency. AeroGuest Journey by AeroGuest and STAY Guest App both aim to streamline hotel operations and enhance guest satisfaction, but they approach these goals differently. Your choice hinges on the specific needs of your hotel, your budget, and the scale at which you want to operate.
AeroGuest emphasizes deep integration with your property management system (PMS) and offers a broad suite of functionalities that automate check-in, check-out, and guest communication. STAY, meanwhile, provides a highly rated, user-friendly platform trusted by over 1,000 hotels worldwide, with a focus on simplifying guest access to hotel services through a mobile app. Which of these platforms aligns better with your hotel's operational priorities?
Both AeroGuest and STAY target improving guest interaction and operational workflows, but their strengths differ. AeroGuest excels in full PMS integration, offering features like mobile check-in, mobile keys, and contactless payments, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing automation and seamless property management. STAY, with a substantial review base and a focus on guest experience, leans into ease of use and broad service digitization.
AeroGuest boasts a smaller review count (9 reviews) with recent feedback indicating its efficiency in automating payments and check-ins, but limited user data makes it riskier for larger-scale deployment. STAY’s 206 reviews, all recent, reinforce its status as a tested, proven solution. Do you prefer a platform with a proven track record and extensive user feedback or one with promising automation capabilities but limited reviews?
If your hotel needs full PMS integration, mobile check-in, and contactless guest services, AeroGuest is the better fit. Its suite of unique features, including mobile room keys, device-agnostic access, and upselling tools, suits hotels looking to automate and personalize guest stays.
If your hotel seeks a simple, easy-to-implement app that enhances guest satisfaction through service digitization—like real-time updates, restaurant reservations, and request management—STAY is the smarter choice. Its extensive user base and proven results in reducing queues and improving operational efficiency make it ideal for mid to large-sized properties.
Both AeroGuest and STAY receive high ease-of-use ratings—4.78/5 in recent reviews—indicating a straightforward experience for staff and guests. AeroGuest’s onboarding is rated 4.67/5, with reviews praising its intuitive dashboards and seamless integration setup. Guests appreciate the mobile key and re-booking features, noting the system makes check-ins and payments smoother.
STAY’s platform is also lauded for being user-friendly, with a simple CMS and an app that guests find intuitive. Some reviews mention that STAY’s interface enables quick updates and easy management, even for technically less experienced staff. Given identical ease-of-use ratings, edge: AeroGuest for more integrated, automation-focused workflows.
AeroGuest offers a significantly broader feature set, with 30 unique functionalities, including mobile check-in, PMS integration, NFC, contactless ordering, loyalty programs, and room upgrades. These features support a highly automated, contactless guest journey, making AeroGuest suitable for hotels aiming for a fully digital experience.
STAY provides only four exclusive features—chatbot, automated replies, message routing, and a mobile app—focusing more on guest communication and content delivery. Its strength lies in elevating operational communication rather than deep automation. Edge: AeroGuest for its comprehensive feature depth, especially in automation and integration.
AeroGuest’s support score (4.89/5) is slightly higher than STAY’s (4.83/5), with reviews highlighting approachable, innovative teams that assist swiftly. AeroGuest’s small review count (9) limits comprehensive insight, but existing feedback emphasizes personalized support and ongoing product improvements.
STAY’s support is also highly rated, with many users praising its quick response and helpful service. Some reviews note the absence of phone support and regional limitations, but overall, support remains reliable. Edge: AeroGuest, given its marginally higher score and focus on dedicated client engagement.
AeroGuest boasts 26 verified partner integrations, including major PMS providers like Mews, SiteMinder, and Oracle Hospitality, alongside hardware partners like SALTO and dormakaba. It covers a wide array of functionalities from payment systems to door lock controls, supporting extensive automation.
STAY has 20 verified integrations, including popular systems like Hotelkit, Amadeus, and Winhotel, but fewer hardware partners. Shared integrations include SiteMinder and Oracle, but AeroGuest’s broader ecosystem makes it more adaptable for complex property setups. Edge: AeroGuest for its extensive integration network.
Review counts heavily favor STAY, with 206 recent reviews and an overall rating of 3/5, compared to AeroGuest’s 9 reviews and 0/5 rating. Hotels using STAY—from large chains like NH Hotels to resorts like Dreams Natura—praise its ability to improve efficiency, reduce queues, and increase guest satisfaction.
AeroGuest’s limited reviews make it difficult to assess broad satisfaction, but the positive comments focus on its automation and innovation. Given the volume and recency of STAY reviews, edge: STAY.
AeroGuest does not publicly disclose pricing, which may suggest custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. It’s likely a higher-end investment, especially with a broad feature suite and deep PMS integration.
STAY charges a flat $300 monthly fee, with no implementation fees or tiered pricing. Its transparent, predictable pricing makes budgeting straightforward for hotels seeking scalable solutions. Given the lack of detailed AeroGuest pricing, edge: STAY for affordability and transparency.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Core difference: AeroGuest emphasizes automation, deep PMS integration, and a broad feature set, while STAY focuses on simplifying guest-facing services with proven operational benefits.
When to choose AeroGuest: If automation, contactless check-in, and integrations are your top priorities, AeroGuest’s extensive capabilities make it the best choice. Its suite of 30 features supports a highly digital, personalized guest journey suitable for larger, tech-forward hotels.
When to choose STAY: If your goal is to improve operational efficiency quickly, reduce queues, and provide a simple, intuitive guest app, STAY’s proven track record and large user base make it the ideal solution. Its focus on core guest experiences delivers measurable ROI for a range of property types.
Final verdict: AeroGuest’s suite of automation tools makes it the stronger choice if your hotel needs a deeply integrated, feature-rich platform. However, STAY’s extensive, recent reviews and proven success in streamlining hotel operations position it as the more reliable pick for most hoteliers seeking a trusted guest app today.
According to HTR's product database, AeroGuest Journey and STAY Guest App share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot | ||
| Device Agnostic | ||
| Easy Room Selection | ||
| Message Routing | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| PCI Compliant | ||
| PMS Integration | ||
| Pre-arrival Upselling & Upgrades |
Showing top differences. 22 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information... Multiple reviews highlight how STAY dramatically enhances guest experience by providing digital and sustainable ways for guests to access information and services. Features like real-time updates, mobile service ordering, and the ability to make restaurant reservations reduce wait times and provide convenience.
The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and man... The app's user interface and mobile experience are lauded for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Users find it simple to update information and manage content, whether they are hotel staff or guests.
STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front de... STAY aids in improving hotel operational efficiency by allowing quicker handling of guest requests, optimized internal processes, and reduced front desk lines. The tool facilitates sustainable practices by digitizing traditional paper-based services, aiding hotels in their sustainability goals.
Where hoteliers push back
The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more f... The CMS is highlighted for its ease of use and customization capabilities, though users have indicated some areas for improvement, particularly more flexibility in design and functionality.
Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrati... Users appreciate STAY's robust integration capabilities with various internal applications and systems, including PMS and CRM systems. These integrations streamline data management and help provide a seamless experience for both staff and guests.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. AeroGuest Journey and STAY Guest App share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. AeroGuest Journey offers 26 verified integration partners, while STAY Guest App offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. STAY Guest App leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
AeroGuest Journey: No. STAY Guest App: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AeroGuest has an HT Score of 0 and STAY has 47. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor