The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 96 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AeroGuest shines , with exclusive features like Hotel Website Check-in Portal.
straiv shines when it comes to digital check-in and check-out , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
Side-by-side ratings based on 96 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 13 | 83 |
After analyzing 96 verified reviews, AeroGuest users most value its , while straiv users highlight digital check-in and check-out, guest communication and customization, ease of implementation and use. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Digital check-in and check-out
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest communication and customization
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of implementation and use
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous improvement and updates
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Payment process issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #15 1 reviews | #3 27 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #8 9 reviews | #3 41 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #17 1 reviews | #5 8 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 2 reviews | #5 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #7 10 reviews | #3 28 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 5 reviews | #9 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #19 1 reviews | #3 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #16 0 reviews | #4 18 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #12 0 reviews | #16 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #8 12 reviews | #2 79 reviews |
| Middle East | #8 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between AeroGuest Check-in and straiv hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and priorities. Both platforms aim to streamline contactless check-in, yet they differ significantly in features, scale, and recent reviews. Your decision should reflect whether you value more comprehensive automation and global reach or a user-friendly, well-supported system with a strong regional presence.
While AeroGuest boasts more recent reviews and a higher overall rating, straiv’s extensive partner network and broader feature set make it a serious contender. Which platform aligns best with your hotel’s operational goals and guest expectations?
Both AeroGuest and straiv serve the same core purpose: enabling contactless check-in to reduce friction and enhance safety. AeroGuest’s platform emphasizes full automation, with features like pre-registration, document scanning, and multi-lingual options, aiming to minimize front-desk interactions.
straiv also focuses on contactless solutions, offering online check-in/out, guest messaging, and upselling, but with a broader suite of features like digital concierge and room service. However, AeroGuest’s recent review count (11) and perfect overall ratings suggest it has more consistent recent customer satisfaction.
Do your hotel’s priorities lean toward extensive automation and international reach, or do you prefer a feature-rich, regionally strong platform?
If your hotel needs a platform that offers high-level automation with integrations to over 14 PMS and payment systems, AeroGuest is your best choice. It’s ideal for hotels seeking a seamless guest experience before arrival, with features like custom questions, document scanning, and e-signatures.
On the other hand, if your hotel values a platform that provides a broader feature set—like guest messaging, digital concierge, and room service—straiv suits properties looking for a comprehensive guest journey. Its focus on user-friendly design and strong support makes it a solid pick for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency.
Hotels needing extensive automation and international support: AeroGuest.
Hotels wanting a broader feature range with strong local support: straiv.
AeroGuest’s ease-of-use rating stands at 4.77/5, with reviews praising its straightforward setup and seamless onboarding, especially for staff accustomed to high automation. Users highlight its intuitive interface for guests, with specific praise for personalization features.
straiv’s UI is rated slightly lower at 4.69/5, with reviews noting its simplicity and practicality but mentioning occasional interface sluggishness. Both platforms are praised for quick implementation, yet AeroGuest’s recent reviews suggest it may have a slight edge regarding ease of staff and guest adoption.
Edge: AeroGuest.
AeroGuest offers 11 unique features, including PCI compliance, document scanning, pre-registration info collection, and multi-lingual support, which straiv does not provide. These features facilitate a more automated and secure check-in process.
straiv provides 11 features such as guest messaging, digital concierge, room service ordering, and payment management, which complement but do not overlap extensively with AeroGuest’s offerings. If your hotel needs advanced in-room or guest communication features, straiv’s broader suite may serve better.
Edge: AeroGuest, for its specialized, automation-focused features.
AeroGuest’s support rating is 4.77/5, with reviews describing it as helpful, responsive, and attentive. Users consistently praise AeroGuest’s onboarding process and support team for quick problem resolution.
straiv’s slightly lower support rating of 4.72/5 reflects its strong regional presence and dedicated team, but reviews mention occasional delays. Both platforms excel in support, yet AeroGuest’s recent reviews indicate a slight advantage in responsiveness and customer satisfaction.
Edge: AeroGuest.
straiv boasts 36 verified integrations, surpassing AeroGuest’s 26. Shared partners include major PMS and access control providers like Oracle, SALTO, and dormakaba. straiv’s broader partner network may offer more flexibility and options for various hotel systems.
AeroGuest’s integrations cover key systems but are fewer, focusing on automation and front-desk workflows. If extensive, diverse integrations matter, straiv’s platform delivers more choices.
Edge: straiv.
AeroGuest’s perfect 5/5 overall rating is backed by just 11 reviews, mostly from luxury and boutique hotels. Its recent review activity is minimal, but the high rating suggests strong satisfaction among those who’ve rated it.
straiv’s 4.81/5 rating comes from 81 reviews, with 78 reviews over the last six months, indicating more current feedback. Its users, primarily in regional markets and mid-sized properties, value its usability and feature set.
Edge: straiv, for broader and more recent feedback.
AeroGuest charges a flat $400 monthly fee without a freemium option or trial. There are no implementation fees, but pricing may be less flexible for smaller hotels.
straiv’s pricing is $500 per month, also without a free tier or trial, with no implementation fees. Its slightly higher cost is balanced by its broader feature set and more extensive partner integrations.
Both platforms’ pricing structures are straightforward, but AeroGuest’s lower price may appeal to smaller or budget-conscious properties.
Not ideal if your hotel requires in-room services, guest messaging, or concierge features.
Not ideal if your hotel needs highly automated, multi-lingual check-in or extensive integrations with advanced POS systems.
AeroGuest offers a streamlined, automation-first contactless check-in platform with a strong focus on security and integration. Its high rating and recent reviews underscore its reliability for hotels seeking full pre-arrival automation and operational efficiency.
straiv provides a broader feature set with a focus on guest engagement and regional support. Its extensive partner network and current, positive reviews make it ideal for properties aiming to optimize the entire guest journey with flexible, contactless solutions.
If your hotel values extensive automation, high security, and a global reach, AeroGuest is the better choice. Its high satisfaction rating and recent reviews support this.
For hotels that want a flexible, feature-rich platform with strong local support and broad integrations, straiv is preferable. Its comprehensive approach to contactless service, combined with more current user feedback, makes it the recommended option.
In conclusion, AeroGuest is best for hotels prioritizing automation and security, while straiv excels in providing a versatile, guest-centric experience. Choose based on your operational needs and guest service goals.
According to HTR's product database, AeroGuest Check-in and straiv share 8 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Collect Deposits | ||
| Document & Passport Scanning | ||
| Easy Room Selection | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Local Recommendations | ||
| Marketing Communications Opt-in | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Mobile Checkout | ||
| PCI Compliant | ||
| Pre-regisration info collection | ||
| Room Service Ordering | ||
| Web-app |
Showing top differences. 10 more features differ between these products.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Digital check-in and check-out are praised for significantly reducing waiting times for guests and administrative burdens for staff. Reviews emphasize... Digital check-in and check-out are praised for significantly reducing waiting times for guests and administrative burdens for staff. Reviews emphasize the benefits of contactless processes, especially during the COVID-19 era, providing guests with seamless and flexible arrivals and departures, while ensuring compliance with health safety protocols.
Users appreciate the ability to communicate directly with guests through journey mailing and other customizable modules. This facilitates timely infor... Users appreciate the ability to communicate directly with guests through journey mailing and other customizable modules. This facilitates timely information exchange, promotional offers, and enhances overall guest satisfaction. Reviews laud the flexibility in designing guest interactions based on individual hotel needs.
Straiv receives high marks for the ease with which its system can be implemented, requiring no advanced IT skills. Reviews consistently mention the to... Straiv receives high marks for the ease with which its system can be implemented, requiring no advanced IT skills. Reviews consistently mention the tool's intuitive user interface, making it easy for both staff and guests to interact with the system.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users report issues with the payment processing feature, such as delays and incomplete data transfers. Improvements in integrating multiple payme... Some users report issues with the payment processing feature, such as delays and incomplete data transfers. Improvements in integrating multiple payment gateways are suggested to enhance efficiency and reliability.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. AeroGuest Check-in and straiv share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. AeroGuest Check-in offers 26 verified integration partners, while straiv offers 37. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. AeroGuest Check-in leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
AeroGuest Check-in: No. straiv: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AeroGuest has an HT Score of 0 and straiv has 73. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor