The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 872 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AeroGuest shines , with exclusive features like Lobby Kiosk.
Canary Technologies shines in ease of use and onboarding — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Digital Acceptance & Payment Capture.
Side-by-side ratings based on 872 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 3 | 869 |
After analyzing 872 verified reviews, AeroGuest users most value its , while Canary Technologies users highlight upselling effectiveness, guest messaging, contactless check-in. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Upselling Effectiveness
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Digital Tipping
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
−
AI Functionality
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Upselling Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #19 0 reviews | #1 79 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #21 1 reviews | #1 584 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #18 1 reviews | #2 129 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #19 1 reviews | #1 60 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #21 1 reviews | #1 406 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #21 1 reviews | #1 325 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #21 1 reviews | #1 397 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #20 0 reviews | #1 69 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #21 0 reviews | #1 733 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #19 3 reviews | #6 42 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #4 18 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #12 0 reviews | #5 10 reviews |
Choosing the right upselling software can significantly impact your hotel's revenue and guest experience. AeroGuest and Canary Upsells both aim to boost ancillary sales and streamline operations, but they differ in scale, features, and market presence.
AeroGuest focuses on automating the guest journey with features like mobile check-in and room upgrades, while Canary emphasizes comprehensive contactless check-in, digital payment, and AI-driven guest messaging. Both solve the challenge of increasing revenue without adding staff workload, but their approaches and maturity levels vary.
Are you looking for a platform with a proven global reach and high user ratings? Or do you prefer a solution with more extensive integrations and a broader feature set? This comparison will help you decide.
AeroGuest and Canary Upsells both aim to increase hotel revenue through guest engagement, but they approach it differently. AeroGuest offers a mobile-first upselling platform with features like pre-arrival upgrades, self-service check-in/out, and device-agnostic solutions. Its core strength lies in automating the guest journey with targeted offers, but its recent review count is only 3, with no reviews in the last six months.
Conversely, Canary Upsells is a highly-rated platform boasting 794 recent reviews, a 4.8/5 overall rating, and a 96% likelihood to recommend. It excels in contactless check-in, digital payment, and AI-driven guest messaging, making it a more mature product with a broader feature set.
Given the disparity in review recency and volume, Canary's reputation and recent user feedback make it the more reliable choice. Do you prioritize a trusted, well-established solution, or are you exploring newer options with innovative features?
If your hotel primarily needs a mobile upselling solution to facilitate contactless check-in, room upgrades, and pre-arrival upsells, AeroGuest is a suitable option. It suits hotels that emphasize mobile engagement and automation but may have limited integration options and a smaller user base to rely on.
If you require a comprehensive contactless management system with advanced AI messaging, digital payments, fraud prevention, and extensive PMS integrations, Canary Technologies is the clear winner. Its larger market presence, diverse features, and high user satisfaction make it ideal for hotels seeking a full guest management platform.
For boutique hotels, luxury properties, or hotels aiming to expand digital services quickly, Canary's broader functionality and proven track record make it the safer, more scalable choice.
AeroGuest scores 4.33/5 for onboarding and ease of use, with some reviews mentioning limited in-app customization and the need for future updates. Its interface is designed to be mobile-friendly and simple for staff to adopt, but its small review count suggests limited feedback on long-term usability.
Canary, rated at 4.85/5 for ease of use, benefits from a well-designed, intuitive platform praised for quick setup and minimal learning curve. Its reviews highlight fast onboarding, straightforward guest messaging, and seamless PMS integration.
Edge: Canary Technologies.
AeroGuest offers 10 unique features, including PMS integration, PCI compliance, self-service check-in/out, device agnosticism, and ID verification. These features support a streamlined, contactless guest journey with automation capabilities.
Canary provides six features but includes advanced digital acceptance, gift vouchers, automated task routing, dynamic upgrade pricing, and offer templates. It also offers robust fraud prevention and digital tipping, making it a more versatile platform.
While AeroGuest offers a broader set of core features, Canary’s specialized tools for upselling, payment, and security give it an edge in overall functionality.
Edge: AeroGuest (by a small margin).
AeroGuest’s support scores 4.67/5 based on limited reviews, with feedback indicating a responsive team but few recent references. Its small user base makes comprehensive support harder to assess.
Canary, with a 4.71/5 rating and 794 reviews, is widely praised for strong responsiveness and effective onboarding. Many users comment on proactive support, fast issue resolution, and ongoing platform improvements.
Given the volume of recent reviews, Canary’s support reputation is clearer and more positive, making it the better choice for ongoing assistance.
Edge: Canary Technologies.
AeroGuest offers 26 verified integrations, including prominent systems like Opera, D-Edge, and Booking Factory. Its integrations cover key property management, distribution, and access control systems but are fewer than Canary's.
Canary boasts 54 verified integrations, including shared partners like Mews, Infor, and SiteMinder, plus additional integrations such as WebRezPro, InnRoad, and OpenHotel. Its broader integration ecosystem supports more seamless hotel operations.
Edge: Canary Technologies.
Canary has a significantly higher review count, with 794 recent reviews and a 4.8/5 overall rating, reflecting broad user satisfaction. Hotels of various sizes and segments, including luxury, boutique, and branded hotels, consistently praise its reliability and features.
AeroGuest, with only 3 reviews and a 0/5 rating, lacks sufficient feedback to gauge property satisfaction. The limited reviews and recent data suggest it is less trusted at this time.
Overall, hoteliers rate Canary higher by a wide margin.
Edge: Canary Technologies.
AeroGuest’s pricing details are not publicly available, and it does not offer a freemium or trial model, making direct comparison difficult.
Canary charges a base fee of $300 per month, with no mention of implementation fees or trial options. Its predictable pricing makes budgeting easier for hotels looking for a proven solution.
If cost is a primary concern, Canary’s transparent pricing provides more clarity.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive PMS integration, AI messaging, or advanced security features.
Not ideal if you prefer a smaller, more specialized upselling tool or have minimal digital engagement needs.
In essence, AeroGuest is a good choice for hotels focused on mobile check-in, room upgrades, and automation with a simple interface. It’s best suited for properties that want to start with basic upselling features and do not need extensive integrations.
Canary, however, offers a broader suite of features, including secure digital payments, AI messaging, fraud prevention, and a vast network of integrations. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and industry recognition make it the safer, more dependable option for hotels aiming for a full-scale contactless guest experience and revenue growth.
If your hotel needs a proven, scalable platform with extensive support and features, go with Canary Technologies. If you’re looking for a lighter, mobile-focused upselling tool, AeroGuest may suffice, but be aware of its limited recent reviews and market presence.
Upselling Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
According to HTR's product database, AeroGuest Upselling and Canary Upsells share 8 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Fulfillment Task Routing | ||
| Device Agnostic | ||
| Digital Acceptance & Payment Capture | ||
| Dynamic Upgrade Pricing | ||
| Easy Room Selection | ||
| Gift Vouchers & Prepaid Experiences | ||
| Offer Templates Library | ||
| PCI Compliant | ||
| PMS Integration | ||
| Pre-arrival Upselling & Upgrades | ||
| Self Service Checkin | ||
| Type 2 SOC 2 Certified (Data Security) |
Showing top differences. 4 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"In short, we’ve been able to improve the guest experience, eliminate fraud, and drive incremental revenue from upsells."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Anytime a software works well and makes my life easier, I like it and Canary has done exactly that. I absolutely recommend the platform to all other hotel operators."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many reviews mention that Canary's upselling features have been instrumental in increasing revenue through room upgrades, early check-in, and other ad... Many reviews mention that Canary's upselling features have been instrumental in increasing revenue through room upgrades, early check-in, and other add-ons. The automated system assists in capturing additional revenue by pushing relevant offers to guests at optimal times during their stay.
Reviewers appreciate Canary's guest messaging feature for improving communication efficiency. It enables hotels to address guest inquiries quickly, re... Reviewers appreciate Canary's guest messaging feature for improving communication efficiency. It enables hotels to address guest inquiries quickly, reducing the burden on front desk staff and enhancing guest satisfaction. The integration of AI for automated responses has been beneficial but requires careful tuning to avoid generic interactions.
Canary's contactless check-in feature has been highlighted for improving the check-in experience, making it faster and more convenient for both guests... Canary's contactless check-in feature has been highlighted for improving the check-in experience, making it faster and more convenient for both guests and staff. This functionality is especially appreciated during high-volume periods, allowing smoother operations and enhancing guest arrivals.
Where hoteliers push back
Customization is frequently mentioned as an area for improvement. Users desire more flexibility in customizing automated messages, upselling templates... Customization is frequently mentioned as an area for improvement. Users desire more flexibility in customizing automated messages, upselling templates, and guest communication to better align with their brand and enhance guest personalization.
Several reviews emphasize the smooth integration between Canary and the hotel's PMS, which facilitates real-time data synchronization and reduces manu... Several reviews emphasize the smooth integration between Canary and the hotel's PMS, which facilitates real-time data synchronization and reduces manual errors. However, some users note challenges with initial setup and suggest improvements for deeper system integration.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. AeroGuest Upselling and Canary Upsells share many core Upselling Software features, but each has unique capabilities. AeroGuest Upselling offers 26 verified integration partners, while Canary Upsells offers 54. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Canary Upsells leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
AeroGuest Upselling: No. Canary Upsells: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Upselling Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AeroGuest has an HT Score of 0 and Canary Technologies has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor