The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 42 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Akia shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Friendly and Guest History.
Facil shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 42 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 42 | 0 |
After analyzing 42 verified reviews, Akia users most value its guest messaging, team communication and task management, contactless check-in, while Facil users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Facil |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Team communication and task management
▾
|
|
|
+
Contactless check-in
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer feedback and reputation management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Automated responses
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and data synchronization
▾
|
|
|
−
Guidebooks and digital tools
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Facil |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 17 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 18 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #19 0 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #16 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Facil |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 17 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 7 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 10 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #7 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Facil |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 41 reviews | — |
Choosing between Akia Contactless Check-In and Facil by Facil hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for guest communication and operational automation. Akia excels in streamlining contactless check-in and guest messaging, while Facil appears to offer review analysis and actionable insights but lacks recent user feedback. How do these differences impact your hotel’s daily operations and guest experience?
If your goal is to implement a highly-rated contactless check-in solution with strong support and recent reviews, Akia is the clear choice. Facil might appeal if you prioritize review analysis and data-driven recommendations, but its lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it less reliable at this moment.
Akia, with its 38 reviews and a recent surge in feedback over the last six months, has a high overall rating of 4.95/5 and a 97% likelihood to recommend. Facil, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its current user satisfaction.
Akia is designed specifically for contactless check-in, guest messaging, and automating guest communications, making it ideal for hotels seeking to modernize their arrival process. Facil’s AI review summaries and recommendation features suggest a focus on reputation management and operational insights, but without recent reviews, its effectiveness remains uncertain.
Do you need a contactless check-in system with proven user satisfaction, or are you seeking a review analysis tool for ongoing reputation management?
If your hotel needs a proven, easy-to-deploy contactless check-in platform that boosts guest satisfaction and reduces staff workload, go with Akia. Its strong reviews, high customer satisfaction scores, and features like self-service check-in, messaging, and PMS integration make it suitable for a wide range of hotel types, especially boutique properties and independent hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes understanding guest feedback and generating operational improvements through AI-driven review analysis, Facil might be tempting. However, with no recent reviews or ratings, it’s hard to justify choosing Facil over Akia unless you already know its capabilities and trust its performance.
In summary, for contactless check-in and guest communication, Akia is the more reliable choice. Facil’s value lies in review insights, but the absence of recent user data makes it less trustworthy today.
Akia scores 4.82/5 for ease of use, reflecting its user-friendly interface, straightforward onboarding, and positive staff adoption. Reviewers praise Akia’s intuitive design, quick setup, and helpful customer support, with comments like “Getting ahold of a representative has been, by far, the easiest and best customer service we have ever experienced.”
Facil lacks any recent reviews or ratings, so assessing its usability is impossible. Given the absence of user feedback, it’s uncertain how easy Facil is to deploy and adopt.
Edge: Akia.
Akia offers 35 unique features, including contactless check-in, digital waivers, guest messaging, photo sharing, chatbot booking, WhatsApp and Facebook integrations, PMS connectivity, document scanning, door lock integration, and multi-lingual support. These functionalities cater directly to streamlining guest arrivals and communication.
Facil does not list any specific features or functionalities, focusing instead on review summarization and AI recommendations. Its lack of feature transparency makes it difficult to compare directly.
Edge: Akia.
Akia’s support scores 4.86/5, with reviewers describing their customer service as “extremely knowledgeable” and “the easiest support experience I’ve had.” The support team’s responsiveness and onboarding assistance have been praised consistently in recent reviews.
Facil has no recent reviews or support ratings available, leaving its customer support quality unverified. Without user feedback, it’s risky to assume Facil provides comparable support.
Edge: Akia.
Akia boasts 32 verified partner integrations, including major PMS systems like WebRezPro, InnRoad, Stayntouch, and property access solutions like FLEXIPASS. Its ability to connect with various systems facilitates smoother operations and reduces manual data entry.
Facil shows no verified integrations, indicating a likely lack of direct system connectivity, which could hinder operational fluidity.
Edge: Akia.
Akia, with its 38 reviews, has a 4.95/5 overall rating and a 97% likelihood of recommendation, especially among boutique and independent hotels. Recent reviews highlight improvements in reputation management, guest communication, and operational efficiency.
Facil has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or how it performs across different hotel segments.
Edge: Akia.
Both Akia and Facil do not publicly list their pricing models, implying custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. However, Akia does not offer a freemium or trial version, indicating it’s likely a paid enterprise solution.
Facil similarly provides no detailed pricing information, and the lack of recent reviews or user feedback suggests a need for direct outreach to understand costs.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on credit card transactions at check-in, as Akia currently lacks secure card capture features.
Not ideal if your priority is contactless check-in or guest communication automation, especially given the lack of recent user feedback and feature details.
Akia stands out as the contactless check-in platform with a strong user base, recent positive reviews, and a high satisfaction score. Its extensive features and integrations support smooth, contactless arrivals, making it suitable for diverse hotel types, particularly boutique and independent properties.
Facil, with no recent reviews and limited publicly available data, remains an uncertain choice. Its focus on review insights could be valuable if proven, but without current user feedback, it’s not a dependable option for most hoteliers today.
If your hotel needs a reliable, highly-rated contactless check-in solution, Akia’s proven track record makes it the clear winner. Conversely, if you are exploring review management tools and are comfortable with less proven platforms, Facil might merit further investigation.
According to HTR's product database, Akia Contactless Check-In and Facil share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Facil |
|---|---|---|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot Booking Agent | ||
| Desktop App (non-web based) | ||
| Mobile Friendly | ||
| Photo Sharing | ||
| Whatsapp Integration |
Showing top differences. 23 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Automation emphasizes the guests experience at their fingertips. Akia closes the gap of missed opportunities by acting as a liaison to our guest satisfaction efforts. We have been..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The messaging system is prized for facilitating real-time communication with guests, enhancing service quality. It helps staff manage guest requests a... The messaging system is prized for facilitating real-time communication with guests, enhancing service quality. It helps staff manage guest requests and issues promptly, which positively impacts guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
Internal team communication and task management features are highlighted as significant benefits. These tools help hotel staff coordinate efficiently,... Internal team communication and task management features are highlighted as significant benefits. These tools help hotel staff coordinate efficiently, track tasks, and manage guest needs more effectively. Users believe improvements could be made in the clarity and usability of these systems.
Reviewers consistently appreciate Akia's contactless check-in feature, stating it makes the check-in process seamless and efficient. This feature redu... Reviewers consistently appreciate Akia's contactless check-in feature, stating it makes the check-in process seamless and efficient. This feature reduces physical interactions, streamlines the guest arrival experience, and ensures compliance with health guidelines, especially valued during the pandemic.
Where hoteliers push back
Many users highlight the benefit of Akia's automated responses which save time and effort. However, several reviews mention that these automated respo... Many users highlight the benefit of Akia's automated responses which save time and effort. However, several reviews mention that these automated responses can sometimes be inaccurate or mistimed, causing confusion for guests and requiring manual intervention from staff.
Users appreciate Akia's integration capabilities with PMS and other systems but desire improvements such as seamless credit card transaction integrati... Users appreciate Akia's integration capabilities with PMS and other systems but desire improvements such as seamless credit card transaction integration and better synchronization features to eliminate duplicated efforts and manual data entry.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Akia Contactless Check-In and Facil share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Akia Contactless Check-In offers 32 verified integration partners, while Facil offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Akia Contactless Check-In leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Akia Contactless Check-In: No. Facil: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Akia has an HT Score of 63 and Facil has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor