The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 53 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Reporting Dashboard and Guest profiles.
FelhőMatrac shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 53 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 53 | 0 |
After analyzing 53 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its integration and usability, innovation and updates, analytics and reporting, while FelhőMatrac users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Integration and Usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Innovation and Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue and Pricing Strategy
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customer Support
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #8 7 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 10 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #4 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 18 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 17 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 16 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #6 5 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #5 13 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #5 12 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #4 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #3 4 reviews | — |
Choosing between Amadeus iHotelier® CRS and FelhőMatrac hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline reservations and distribution, but their approaches and maturity levels differ sharply. While FelhőMatrac appears to be an unestablished product with limited reviews, Amadeus dominates with a robust track record, extensive features, and widespread regional presence. Given the disparity in review data, Amadeus's more recent and numerous reviews make it the more reliable option for hotels seeking proven performance.
Amadeus offers a comprehensive Central Reservations System that automates distribution across multiple channels, helps manage inventory, and boosts revenue. FelhőMatrac, on the other hand, provides a basic reservation platform with no available reviews or detailed feature set, making it hard to assess its capabilities or reliability.
Amadeus's platform is designed for hotels of all sizes, from boutique properties to large chains, integrating with GDS, OTA channels, and PMS systems. FelhőMatrac’s lack of verified integrations and regional presence suggests its scope and scale are still limited, an important consideration if your hotel requires broad distribution or advanced analytics.
Given the more extensive review base and recent feedback, Amadeus clearly shows a track record of satisfying hotels, whereas FelhőMatrac's unverified claims leave its effectiveness uncertain. Which features matter most to your team — proven reliability or emerging options?
If your hotel needs a proven, full-featured CRS with extensive integrations and a global presence, go with Amadeus. It’s ideal for mid-sized to large hotels seeking a centralized system capable of managing reservations, rates, and distribution channels efficiently.
If, however, your hotel operates in a small or niche market and is looking for a basic reservation platform with minimal complexity, FelhőMatrac might appeal — but only if you can verify its performance and support. Since FelhőMatrac has no reviews or documented features, caution is advised.
For hoteliers prioritizing a trusted platform with solid customer feedback, Amadeus offers a clear advantage. Those seeking an uncomplicated tool with minimal investment should scrutinize FelhőMatrac further before deciding.
Amadeus’s platform scores highly for ease of use, with a 4.43/5 user rating, and many reviews praising its intuitive interface after initial training. Onboarding is rated 4.1/5, though some users note a learning curve initially, especially given the platform’s complexity.
FelhőMatrac has no available review scores or user feedback, leaving its usability and onboarding process unverified. Without user insights, it’s impossible to determine whether it’s as friendly or straightforward as Amadeus.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers 18 exclusive features including booking engine, channel management, reporting dashboards, metasearch connectivity, RMS and PMS integrations, geotargeted pricing, dynamic pricing, guest profiles, and more. These capabilities enable comprehensive management of reservations, distribution, and revenue strategies.
FelhőMatrac does not list any specific features or integrations, making it difficult to evaluate its functionality. Its lack of distinct features compared to Amadeus suggests it’s a more basic platform at this stage.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support team is rated 4.15/5, with reviews describing them as helpful, responsive, and attentive. Many users appreciate the detailed onboarding and ongoing assistance, though some mention room for improvement in responsiveness and training clarity.
FelhőMatrac has no available reviews or ratings regarding support, support quality, or onboarding experiences. Its lack of feedback makes it impossible to assess whether it can meet your team’s customer service expectations.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integration partners, including major hotel PMS and distribution platforms like Opera, Priority Software, and RevControl. Its broad ecosystem supports extensive connectivity, helping streamline operations and distribution.
FelhőMatrac has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel management systems or distribution channels. If your hotel relies on multiple systems working together, this is a significant consideration.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 4.57/5 comes from 52 reviews, with recent feedback indicating consistent satisfaction and an 87% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments — from independent to branded — frequently praise its reliability and feature set.
FelhőMatrac has no reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Without recent or any reviews, the confidence in its performance remains unverified.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus does not publish specific pricing details; their model is typically custom quoted based on hotel size and needs. It does not offer a freemium or trial option, indicating an enterprise-level investment.
FelhőMatrac’s pricing is also not publicly available, and with no reviews or detailed info, assessing its value requires direct contact. It’s likely a lower-cost or emerging product, but without clear data, comparisons are limited.
Not ideal if you’re a small boutique hotel or a property with minimal distribution needs, as the platform’s complexity may be overwhelming.
Not recommended if your hotel depends heavily on channel management, GDS, or advanced revenue management tools, given the lack of verified features and reviews.
Amadeus’s iHotelier CRS offers a well-established, feature-rich platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide. Its extensive integrations, proven support, and recent review data make it the safer choice for hotels seeking reliability and scalability.
FelhőMatrac appears to be a nascent product with no available reviews or documented features. While it might serve small hotels with minimal needs, its unverified status and limited market presence suggest it’s not yet ready for hotels requiring proven systems and broad distribution capabilities.
If your hotel values proven performance, comprehensive features, and support, Amadeus is the clear choice. Conversely, if you’re exploring basic reservation tools and have very limited distribution needs, FelhőMatrac warrants further investigation, but proceed cautiously.
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) and FelhőMatrac share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
FelhőMatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Booking engine | ||
| Call center functionality | ||
| Channel management & OTA distribution | ||
| Content management | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| Reporting Dashboard |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
TravelClick is praised for seamless integration with various channels, GDS, and PMS systems such as Opera. However, concerns are noted regarding the c... TravelClick is praised for seamless integration with various channels, GDS, and PMS systems such as Opera. However, concerns are noted regarding the complicated OTA Sync implementation and the need for the platform to become more user-friendly. Several reviews highlight the long integration times and a few usability challenges that need improvement.
There are mixed reviews regarding the innovation and continuous updates to the platform. Some users appreciate the frequent enhancements and new featu... There are mixed reviews regarding the innovation and continuous updates to the platform. Some users appreciate the frequent enhancements and new features, while others feel that certain aspects, like iHotelier CRS, need more significant updates to remain contemporary and intuitive.
The analytics and reporting tools within TravelClick are highly valued by hoteliers for their ability to track performance and make informed decisions... The analytics and reporting tools within TravelClick are highly valued by hoteliers for their ability to track performance and make informed decisions. Users highlight the detailed business intelligence reports and market intelligence capabilities as critical components for strategy development.
Where hoteliers push back
The customer support of TravelClick is generally appreciated for being helpful, professional, and efficient. Several reviews note the responsiveness a... The customer support of TravelClick is generally appreciated for being helpful, professional, and efficient. Several reviews note the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, though there are mentions of delayed replies and insufficient training. The need for local support in various regions and more training options is also highlighted.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) and FelhőMatrac share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) offers 104 verified integration partners, while FelhőMatrac offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS) leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Central Reservations System (CRS): No. FelhőMatrac: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 79 and FelhőMatrac has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor