The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 164 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines , with exclusive features like On premise.
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Ancillary revenue tracking and Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 164 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 4 | 160 |
After analyzing 164 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #56 1 reviews | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #47 1 reviews | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #26 2 reviews | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #26 0 reviews | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #50 1 reviews | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #42 2 reviews | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #34 3 reviews | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #51 0 reviews | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #37 1 reviews | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #38 2 reviews | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #41 0 reviews | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Amadeus Property Management and Preno aim to streamline your workflows, but they serve very different hotel segments and feature sets. Amadeus, with a long industry history and extensive distribution capabilities, is often favored by larger or more complex properties, while Preno's cloud-native approach and high customer ratings make it appealing for small to mid-sized hotels. Which suits your needs better?
Amadeus offers a broad suite of features with distribution integrations and multi-language/multi-currency support, but its user reviews are limited, and recent feedback is scarce. Preno, on the other hand, benefits from a large, recent review base, high user satisfaction, and a focus on simplicity and connectivity. Are you ready to explore the differences in detail?
Both products aim to manage reservations, guest data, and operational tasks, but they do so with different emphases. Amadeus provides a traditional, on-premise system with multi-lingual and multi-currency features appropriate for international or chain hotels, yet recent reviews are absent, and its overall user rating is low at 2.5/5. Conversely, Preno, with a 4.73/5 rating from 144 reviews, is cloud-based, easy to use, and highly rated for support and value.
Amadeus’s last reviews are over six years old, with a notably negative recent review citing service issues and ongoing problems. Preno’s latest reviews, all within the last six months, consistently praise its simplicity, customer support, and continuous upgrades. Given the strong recent review volume and high ratings, Preno’s reputation currently holds more weight. Are you comfortable with an older, less-reviewed system, or do you prefer the active, recent validation of Preno?
Your choice depends heavily on your hotel’s size, complexity, and regional needs. If your hotel is a boutique, B&B, or small chain seeking an intuitive, cloud-based system with excellent support, Preno is the clear choice. It offers features like a booking engine, native email marketing, real-time status updates, and an EPoS system, all highly praised by users.
If your hotel is larger, requires multi-lingual or multi-currency support, or relies heavily on distribution channels, Amadeus may seem appealing. However, its limited recent reviews and lower overall ratings suggest it may not meet modern hotel demands as effectively as Preno. For most hoteliers evaluating current performance and support, Preno is the recommended option.
Ease of use can make or break your staff adoption of a PMS. Amadeus scores a 3.5/5 for ease of use, with users citing its interface as manageable but noting older, less modern design elements. Its onboarding process appears adequate but not outstanding, and some users report ongoing difficulties with service responsiveness.
Preno excels with a 4.78/5 ease of use rating, with reviews highlighting its intuitive navigation, straightforward setup, and helpful support team. Multiple users describe onboarding as smooth and emphasize how quickly staff adapt to Preno’s simple, clean interface. Edge: Preno.
Amadeus offers 18 features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and on-premise deployment, catering to specific international and chain hotel needs. Its distribution integrations are extensive, with 104 verified partners, making it suitable for hotels that rely heavily on advanced distribution channels.
Preno boasts 30 features, including ancillary revenue tracking, real-time reporting, a booking engine, native email marketing, and a mobile app—features critical for small to medium hotels focused on operational agility. It also integrates with Xero and channel managers like SiteMinder, making daily management smoother.
While Amadeus has certain unique capabilities, the sheer number of features in Preno, especially its mobile app and automation tools, give it a noticeable advantage in user-perceived value. Edge: Preno.
Customer support quality can impact your daily operations significantly. Amadeus’s support ratings average at 3.63/5, with reviews citing delays and inconsistent service, particularly in remote regions like the Netherlands. A negative review describes six years of unresolved issues and poor support experience.
Preno’s customer support averages 4.8/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, friendly, and effective assistance. Customers consistently mention how Preno’s team is proactive, responsive, and helpful, making onboarding and ongoing use much easier. Edge: Preno.
Amadeus offers a robust network of 104 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment systems, and analytics tools. Its extensive integrations support complex, multi-channel distribution strategies, which are essential for larger or international hotels.
Preno has 17 verified partners, with key integrations including Xero, SiteMinder, and TrustYou. Its focus on core hotel management functions combined with essential integrations suits small to mid-sized hotels seeking reliable, straightforward connectivity.
Given the larger ecosystem supporting Amadeus, it has an edge for properties needing deep and broad integrations. Edge: Amadeus.
Review data shows Preno with a 4.73/5 rating based on 144 reviews, while Amadeus scores only 2.5/5 from 4 reviews. Recent reviews overwhelmingly favor Preno’s ease of use, support, and feature set, with 95% likelihood to recommend and a 9.53/10 NPS score.
Amadeus’s reviews are sparse and include negative feedback about service and ongoing issues, with the best review still only rated 4.5/5. For current user satisfaction, Preno clearly leads.
Edge: Preno.
Amadeus does not publish pricing information publicly, which suggests it operates on a customized quote basis, often making it more expensive and suitable for larger hotels or chains. Preno’s straightforward pricing is $800 per month, with no setup or implementation fees, making it transparent and accessible for smaller properties.
If budget transparency and predictable costs are important, Preno’s model provides better clarity. Amadeus likely costs more but offers customized, enterprise-level solutions.
Hotels that will benefit most from Amadeus include:
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or prioritizes ease of use and quick setup.
Preno is ideal for:
Not ideal if you require multi-lingual, multi-currency capabilities, or complex distribution integrations.
At its core, Amadeus offers a traditional, feature-rich system designed for larger, complex hotels with international demands. Its extensive integrations and multi-language/multi-currency support cater to global properties but come with limited recent reviews, making its current performance less certain.
Preno, with its high user ratings, recent positive reviews, and mobile-friendly features, is better suited for small to mid-sized hotels aiming for simplicity, excellent support, and cost transparency. Its feature set is comprehensive for its target segment, but it may lack some advanced distribution options.
If your hotel values ease of use, support, and recent validation, Preno is the recommended choice. For larger, international operations with complex needs, Amadeus may be appropriate but requires careful consideration given the limited latest feedback. Overall, Preno’s current user satisfaction makes it the stronger recommendation for most hoteliers today.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus Property Management and Preno share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus Property Management and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus Property Management offers 104 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 3.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus Property Management: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor